The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageAtmosphere Threatened By Ocean Pollutants

Posted May 15, 2008 by  Bob Ewing in Environment | 11 comments | 177 views
Advertising
A large quantity of nitrogen compounds emitted into the atmosphere by humans through the burning of fossil fuels and the use of nitrogen fertilizers enters the oceans and may lead to the removal of some carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
An international team of experts from 30 countries has concluded that a large quantity of nitrogen compounds that are emitted into the atmosphere by humans through the burning of fossil fuels and the use of nitrogen fertilizers enters the oceans and may lead to the removal of some carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

The team was led by Texas A&M University Distinguished Professor of Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences Robert Duce.

The conclusions of the study are published in the current issue of the journal Science.

Human-caused atmospheric nitrogen compounds are carried by wind and deposited into the ocean, where they act as a fertilizer and lead to increased production of marine plant life.

The increase in plant life causes more carbon dioxide to be drawn from the atmosphere into the ocean. This process results in the removal of about 10 percent of the human-caused carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, thus potentially reducing the climate warming potential.

Some of the nitrogen that is deposited in the ocean is re-processed to form another nitrogen compound called nitrous oxide, which is then released back into the atmosphere from the ocean.

Nitrous oxide is a powerful greenhouse gas itself and is about 300 times more powerful per molecule than carbon dioxide; thus canceling out about two-thirds of the apparent gain from the carbon dioxide removal.

Duce explained. “But of course, the whole system is so complex that we’re still rather unsure about what some of the other impacts might be within the ocean,” he said.

Nitrogen, in most areas of the ocean, is the nutrient that limits the production of plant life. So when all of the nitrogen in an area of the surface ocean is used up, no more plant life forms in that area.

The scientists found that human-caused nitrogen deposits account for up to one-third of the external input of nitrogen into the ocean, and this increase in nitrogen available for the production of plant life causes more plants to form.

Oceanic plant life is produced from marine carbon (bicarbonate) in the ocean, and that amount of bicarbonate is in equilibrium with the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

When more bicarbonate is used up to produce marine plant life, it disrupts the equilibrium, and carbon dioxide is drawn down to the ocean from the atmosphere to restore the balance.

The human-caused nitrogen fertilization of the ocean removes some of the most important greenhouse gas – carbon dioxide – from the atmosphere. However, this gain, however, is offset by the nitrogen compound, nitrous oxide, that also forms in the ocean due to the nitrogen fertilization and is re-emitted into the atmosphere as a powerful greenhouse gas.

“If you don’t consider the impact of human-caused nitrogen when trying to model climate change, you’re missing a possibly significant part of the overall carbon cycle as well as the nitrogen cycle,” Duce said. “So nitrogen deposition is potentially a very important factor in the climate change issue.”

The team’s calculations show that approximately 54 million tons of nitrogen produced from human activities entered the ocean from the atmosphere in the year 2000.

In addition, the scientists found that the current nitrogen emissions are about 10 times what they were in 1860and the amount of nitrogen entering the atmosphere is expected to rise in the coming decades with the increase in demand for energy and fertilizers, and the team estimates that by the year 2030, human-caused nitrogen emissions will have risen to around 62 million tons per year.

“Clearly, there is much that we do not know about the extent and timescale of the impacts of this nitrogen deposition on the oceans and the subsequent feedbacks to the climate system,” Duce said.

“The implications are complex and interactive, and this is a very important issue that policy makers need to address and that scientists trying to model and understand the future of climate and climate change need to take into consideration.”
article:254769:5::0

2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • redhawk Posted May 16, 2008 by  redhawk
    #1
    So where do we put the Al Gore assertions against gasoline and Jet Fuel consuming Buicks and Grummans in this Equasion??
  • avatar Posted May 16, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #2
    @ redhawk
    So where do we put the Al Gore assertions against gasoline and Jet Fuel consuming Buicks and Grummans in this Equasion??

    anywhere you like.
  • redhawk Posted May 16, 2008 by  redhawk
    #3
    @ Bob Ewing
    anywhere you like.

    Tempting!!
  • avatar Posted May 16, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #4
    @ redhawk
    Tempting!!

    ah go ahead have some fun.
  • redhawk Posted May 16, 2008 by  redhawk
    #5
    @ Bob Ewing
    ah go ahead have some fun.

    GOSH darn it Bob you are really starting somethimng which could turn out BAD!
  • avatar Posted May 16, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #6
    @ redhawk
    GOSH darn it Bob you are really starting somethimng which could turn out BAD!

    why?
  • redhawk Posted May 16, 2008 by  redhawk
    #7
    @ Bob Ewing
    why?

    Well you give me a choice of where it can be stuck and not wanting to possibly stick it in the wrong place I defer to you to give me a hint...
  • avatar Posted May 16, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #8
    @ redhawk
    Well you give me a choice of where it can be stuck and not wanting to possibly stick it in the wrong place I defer to you to give me a hint...

    well I'd suggest a well written article with facts and references.
  • redhawk Posted May 16, 2008 by  redhawk
    #9
    @ Bob Ewing
    well I'd suggest a well written article with facts and references.

    Have you any suggestions that migh not create additional controversial issues??
  • avatar Posted May 16, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #10
    @ redhawk
    Have you any suggestions that migh not create additional controversial issues??

    nope, what is wrong with controversy, intelligent disagreement is the cornerstone of democracy.
  • redhawk Posted May 19, 2008 by  redhawk
    #11
    @ Bob Ewing
    well I'd suggest a well written article with facts and references.

    Factual Findings would be Helpful.. Thaeoretical Agendas are abundant and in this time of unproven facts regarding Climatilogical findings I 'd tend to be pragmatical before giving partial credibility to what academia puts out.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty