The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageOp-Ed: Fixing Healthcare in a Free Market

Posted May 16, 2008 by  Michael Billy (TRA) in Health | 4 comments | 343 views
Advertising
The diagnosis is clear: the healthcare system in the United States is in terrible shape. Of the 301 million people living in the country, 47 million, or 16 percent of the population, do not have health insurance.
-- This article is part 1 of a 5-part series --

Out of those 47 million 8.7 million are children. At the same time, health insurance premiums and the cost of prescription drugs are increasing while the quality of care seems to be declining.

Some people will point to these rising costs and say that greedy drug companies cause them. This, however, is far from the truth. The real reason for the rising costs is government intervention into the healthcare market.

The rising cost of pharmaceuticals, for instance, can be traced to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA forces companies to put their drugs through multiple years worth of research and testing. They also charge the companies huge fees to allow the drugs into the marketplace. These fees do not allow for smaller startup companies to compete with the larger, established companies.

The government also makes the healthcare situation worse by passing laws that have good intentions, but fail miserably. One specific example of this can be seen in the 1974 ERISA law. This law grants tax benefits to employers who provide healthcare to their employees. On the surface, this seems like a good idea. Give the employers an incentive and they will cover their employees, but it has had adverse consequences. Since that law was passed, less and less individuals have decided to cover themselves. So now, instead of catering to the individual, health insurance companies cater to the needs of big businesses. Thus, as wealthy corporations have pumped more money into the healthcare system the prices have artificially risen out of the range of most individuals.

It seems clear that the current level of government intervention into the U.S. healthcare market is not working for the average healthcare consumer. There is no doubt that a major change in the system needs to occur in order to solve the crisis. Some people will claim that more government intervention, via Universal Healthcare or Socialized Medicine, will be the cure. The United States is, after all, the only developed nation that does not have a form of government funded health insurance available to all individuals. These plans give the government even more control and power over the healthcare system.

In Great Britain they have a form of Socialized Medicine known as the National Health Services (NHS), which is the world’s largest publicly funded health service provider. They claim that the health services are free when it is clear that someone has to pay the doctor’s and hospitals. Proponents of Socialized Medicine will tell you that the government pays for it, but where does the government get the money? It comes from the taxpayer, to the tune of 78.5 billion dollars per year and that money is forcibly taken from every individual in the country.

Let’s look at it this way. Imagine my grandmother was dying from a treatable form of cancer, but she was too poor to be able to pay for the chemotherapy. She lacks health insurance and no one in my family has the money to pay for the treatment. Would it then be permissible for me to steal money from someone else in order to fund her treatment? What if I had fifteen other people with me? Or 100? Or 20,000? Of course it would never be appropriate for me to steal to get her treated, even with a gang of 20,000 supporters, but that is what the government does in the case of Socialized Medicine. They take from every individual, even the healthy ones, to pay the medical bills of those that are sick.

Not only is the organization funded through theft, but they can also refuse to treat any individual that they choose. Take the case of John Nuttall as a stark example. Two years ago Mr. Nuttall broke his ankle in three places, but it had not healed properly with a plaster cast. He now lives in constant pain from the feeling of his bones rubbing together. The pain is so excruciating that the doctors have prescribed him a daily dose of the strong painkiller morphine. Nonetheless, NHS doctors refuse to operate on his ankle to fix the problem. Why? Because he is a smoker and he is unable to kick the habit. Nuttall makes a great point about the absurdity of their denial, “I want to warn other smokers that they could be denied medical treatment and there is nothing we can do about it. I have paid my dues as a taxpayer and now the NHS won't treat me.”

Since more government regulation and intervention makes the healthcare situation worse, there is only one solution left to consider: deregulation of the healthcare market. This is the only to decrease the price of healthcare, increase innovations in the healthcare market, and improve the quality of care, solving the healthcare crisis.
article:254723:11::0

2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • redhawk Posted May 16, 2008 by  redhawk
    #1
    Chris.. We may have our issues but the fact remains that Some choose not to join the Health care system since they can go to any emergency room of any hospital in the USA and receive the same Care that Canadians come to the USA to receive... The Quality of Health care in the USA has been ranked very high and our fear is that Nationalized Health care instead of Market driven health care will result in the Inefficiencies that Great Britan and Yes Canada are experiencing ....There is a possible way to makev it more incusive via FREE Choice that Mc Cain is proposing via Subsidy for poor folks or Tax breaks for choosing a plan... Better than having Nanny Gove'r mess up. via inefficient Bureucracy..
  • avatar Posted May 16, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #2
    MB-I must say, I look forward to parts 2-5!

    I do not disagree with you and being a recent recipient of med treatment, the overly inflated costs charged versus the 'allowed' or accepted costs substantiates that prices are inflated not a little, but by 400-500%!

    Healthcare benefits as part of employment is based on mindset of ceo.....if he/she cares, you have good pkg. if he/she is a jerk, you get the ass plan with $3000 deductibles and $500+ per mo premiums(single members).

    Take teachers who are in small districts making <$35K. They are screwed.

    One is better off foregoing insurance and negotiating their hospital bill-but that's a full time job too!

    ER cannot deny anyone treatment. Private DR office can.

    Overcrowded er's are already a problem so we go private for convenience sake.

    It is all a crock. People shouldn't have to stress, wait, freak or die because they cannot afford care. On the flipside, we have a country driven by drs all too quick to prescribe antibiotics for viral infections (uh, no no) and expensive 1st run drugs so they get kick backs. They refer to their best buds (kick backs), oh, I mean the best specialists. And patients, they are vulnerable victims and in their weakest moments should NOT be dealing w/ paper, checks, or worries about billing and codes.

    Grrrrr.

    good article
  • avatar Posted May 17, 2008 by  Michael Billy (TRA)
    #3
    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    I do not disagree with you and being a recent recipient of med treatment, the overly inflated costs charged versus the 'allowed' or accepted costs substantiates that prices are inflated not a little, but by 400-500%!

    Healthcare benefits as part of employment is based on mindset of ceo.....if he/she cares, you have good pkg. if he/she is a jerk, you get the ass plan with $3000 deductibles and $500+ per mo premiums(single members).

    Take teachers who are in small districts making
  • avatar Posted May 17, 2008 by  Michael Billy (TRA)
    #4
    Well somehow that comment got all screwed up. It was supposed to say:

    Most of those issues will be touched on in parts 2-5. Thanks for the encouraging comment.

    Stay tuned for part 2 sometime Monday afternoon EST.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty