The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article image'Liberate' The Homeless

Posted May 14, 2008 by  LewWaters in Politics | 7 comments | 251 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
A group calling themselves “The Homeless Liberation Front” has been staging a protest against Portland, Oregon the last couple weeks. De Facto leaders met today with Mayor Potter to air their list of demands on the city.
Portland, Oregon, one of the most liberal cities on the left coast knuckled under to another group of “Homeless” who started their protest in 2000. They camped on Public Land, refusing to leave and eventually, liberal city officials caved and Dignity Village was born, attracting many more to the area looking for a sweet hand out.

Now, a group calling themselves the Homeless Liberation Front has set up camp outside of City Hall demanding low cost housing and other amenities, at taxpayer expense and a repeal of the city’s no camping, no loitering ordinance.

Mayor Potter has noted that the City of Portland spends $37.5 million every year on programs to end homelessness, get people into jobs, and develop housing.

One protester, claiming to be a 31 homeless veteran said, “It’s really simple; there’s completely inadequate shelter space.” Queried by reporters about empty beds in available shelters, others stated some "homeless" have dogs and shelters won’t accept dogs.

Others claimed shelters spit up men and women and they desired to stay with their partners. Arthur Rios, one of the protest organizers says,
Some people are also just happier camping out, perhaps because they’re not comfortable in large groups or fear having their belongings stolen while they sleep.”


Protesters want the city ban on camping lifted. Potter, in conciliation, said he would be willing to discuss a “green zone,” a centralized campsite where homeless men and women could meet with mental health workers, nurses and social workers in addition to spending the night.

Mayor Potter says he cannot and will not lift the ban on camping within the city. He says Portland Police will “sweep” the campsite, arresting any who defy the order to move along.

The “Homeless” have had their own web site seeking support and airing their side of the stand off, created by The Mental Health Association of Portland.

Noting empty beds at shelters, Mayor Potter also said that many people now participating in the protest obviously were not “homeless” and suggested those people take a few homeless men and women home with them overnight during the protest so they don't violate the law.

Asked if he would take a “homeless” person into his home, Mayor Potter answered, “No!”

Portland has built 1,008 new “low-income” housing units over the last three years and replaced some $20 million in federal funding meant to help people pay rent. Homeless protesters and advocates say shelter space isn’t what they asked for. They demand the right to sleep outdoors and a loosening of anti-loitering laws.

Homeless” Protesters claim
"the city’s camping ordinance and sit/lie ordinance infringe on the civil rights of homeless people,” adding, “These vague vagrancy laws affect our rights to sit or be in the city where and when we choose, they infringe on all of our civil rights.”


One supporter states,
The folks at city hall better hope that the folks out front don't start exercising ALL of their civil rights. The first amendment is great, but the second seems more like it if you want to invoke the true spirit of the founders.”


Others are now referring to liberal Portland as “Hobophobic Portland.”

One “homeless” protester, in a TV News interview, said urging them to move to shelters amounted to “economic discrimination.”

The question that remains unanswered is, just what do these “free spirits” need liberated from, the rules of society that the rest of us must live by?

Is this what the move to the left by society has brought us, a group that feels they may do as they please while we taxpayers pay and support them?

If these are truly “homeless” unemployed people, why do we need so many ILLEGAL aliens to “do the work Americans won’t?" Portland is opening a “day labor center” to help ILLEGALS find employment.

It is my humble opinion that the ILLEGALS should be deported and the “homeless” be given first priority on jobs at this center. If they do not want to work, no entitlements, no benefits.

It is time they "liberated" themselves from the “homeless” lifestyle, got a job and paid their own way!
article:254680:6::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #1
    I agree for the most part, but I kinda sympathize with them too. They do split up families at shelters, and many of the social workers put in place to help these people are burnt out and nasty. As far as the Dog thing, well maybe they can ask the local angels for animals to kennel them or find them homes too, but it isn't unrealistic to ask for no animals in a shelter. Low cost and Low rent housing many times has waiting lists for up to 2 years, so unless they are filling them up quickly the system is to blame.

    Thier anger is valid in some ways but very misdirected.
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #2
    Sam, many of these "protesters" are more of the "professional homeless" that doesn't want to work or live by any rules, just receive handouts.

    I don't know of anyone who wouldn't help others truly down on their luck, temporarily. It's when they keep on demanding and not giving that I draw the line.

    As far as I'm concerned, something like a dog is a luxury, not a necessity.

    Many of these people refused the "Free Education" growing up and now cry they are owed something.

    Returning to the Bibles Old Testament, Israelites were commanded to leave part of their crops for the poor. But, it was up to the poor to go harvest them. They were required to do some work to receive the food, not given a freebie.
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  Gar Swaffar
    #3
    No empathy, no sympathy.
    I work as a contractor in Social Services and see the problem every single day.
    9 out of 10 homeless have no one but themselves and liberal 'feel good' policies to blame for the problem.

    As for Portlands problem:
    The Bird Feeder paradigm fits nicely
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #4
    Not too long ago, one Portland TV Station interviewed a young unmarried couple, in their early twenties, raising a child together. Neither held a job but were living quite well due to begging on street corners, claiming to be homeless. When asked why they wouldn't get jobs, they replied begging paid better and they didn't want to work a regular job.
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #5
    huh, maybe I should start begging, I mean I already get degraded on a daily basis at the fast food place I work at and I only get 20 hours a week. lol
    @ Gar Swaffar
    No empathy, no sympathy.
    I work as a contractor in Social Services and see the problem every single day.
    9 out of 10 homeless have no one but themselves and liberal 'feel good' policies to blame for the problem.

    As for Portlands problem:
    The Bird Feeder paradigm fits nicely


    There are some who are there by choice, and there are others who have been helped by the system till it hurt. Social Services falls short on helping some of the most important issues, society and family. By making parents work two jobs and never be with kids, having others raising thier children, and stripping food and medical benifits from people who quit one job to go to school to better themselves social service workers are just contributing to the problem. It keeps kids in a loveless home with parents who have no time to spend with them, it keeps the parents from being able to provide for thier children especially when the scraps they saved have to be spent on food when some social worker takes thier damn time approving benefits or halts them because they just need you send in another piece of paper they already had. How are the kids supposed to contribute to society with a poor education and no nurturing? It keeps generations poor because of poor education. Section 8 housing is shabby at best, with infestations, unsafe building codes, and waiting lists to even get into these areas mostly in high crime places with illegal drugs.

    Maybe my area is different but I know too many people who have been helped into the hole by the system when all they wanted was a chance. Now I am not saying these people are right in all they say, I just think thier anger is misdirected and they could do much more for themselves.
  • avatar Posted May 19, 2008 by  Ed Boston
    #6
    It's interesting to see that the homeless in Oregon are "high-tech" with their own website. Our country has come a long way from the hobo days.

    Oh and by the way, I fully believe in the Bible examples of helping those who are in need. I'll let anyone interested to research for themselves.
  • avatar Posted May 19, 2008 by  Johnny Simpson
    #7
    Some people fall through the cracks.

    A guy deserts his family and they're stuck. Somebody loses it all in bankruptcy and has to start over from nothing.

    Some of the most powerful films you'll ever see are true stories of people that have lost it all and built themselves back up. 'Pursuit of Happyness' is a good example.

    For people like that I have sympathy. I was one myself about ten years ago.

    What I do NOT have sympathy for are drug-addicted and alcoholic street bums who have no respect for themselves or anyone else. That they now demand special treatment as bums speaks volumes.

    A guy confronted me once in Allston, outside Boston, begging me for a few dollars to get some KFC. I gave him four. He didn't even wait till I left to go back into the check cashing place I just exited to slap it down on scratch tickets.

    If somebody tries to bum from me and claim they're starving as they often do, I offer to buy them food. How often do you think I get turned down and demanded cash of instead?

    I put it at about 90%. Only had one taker out of about a dozen, and I was glad to do it. Took him to a nearby McDonald's and let him buy anything he wanted.

    The rest were lying bums.

    I'm all for helping people that are down and out get back on their feet. Not a dime for the rest.

    There's a difference between helping and enabling.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?