The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

Child A Prisoner In His Hospital Bed Because Of Cancer

Posted May 13, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime) in Health | 5 comments | 122 views
Advertising
As a young boy in Hamilton, Ontario struggles to deal with leukemia his family says his faith is floundering because of the use of chemo given to him against family wishes.
The young boy is in Child Protective Services after fighting doctors with his father over the desire to try chemo in a bid for life.

The child's father (because the child is in protective custody he can not be names) says that his son is now run down and wants to come home.

The boy was diagnosed when he was seven with acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL). Chemotherapy sent the cancer into remission but now four years later that cancer has returned.

Medical officials say the boy only has about six months to live without chemo and insisted that he go through another round even though the boy and his family wanted to try alternative approaches. With chemo his chance of survival are at best 50-50.

According to the father now that his son is alone in this struggle without his family's faith he has given up.

The boy lies in a hospital room that is surrounded by security guards and CAS and youth protection workers.

"He's a little prisoner, he can't leave his room or anything, he can't visit with any other sick children, he can't go anywhere because he's under house arrest," the father said.

"He's a criminal for having cancer.


The child has undergone the round of chemo and will not be released from hospital until Thursday at the earliest. A judge in Hamilton court is having to decide where the child will go when he is released from hospital, his family or foster care.

"We told him, 'Don't worry buddy, please try to be healthy, relax, relax, relax, relax,' and he even said to me, 'I don't care. They can even kill me with their chemo and stuff I don't care, as long as I can come home and be home with you and mommy," the father recalled.

"You know what that feels like to hear your son say that?"


This child shows a stark face of what can happen when families and doctors don't agree on a medical course.
article:254664:5::0

3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted May 13, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #1
    I don't understand why the parents can't be at the hospital and be with their son.

    Since he is in protective custody it seems like his parents should be able to give him the love and support that he needs by being there with him.
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #2
    These are tough problems. We obviously don't know the fine details, and therefore, no opinion on this specific case has any worth.

    That said, to the best of my knowledge euthanasia, passive and active, is forbidden in Ontario, and not giving the boy chemotherapy would amount to passive euthanasia. The law seems to support CAS and the doctors.

    I also don't believe that most 11 year olds are simply not qualified to make decisions about their own care.

    I am a bit suspicious because of the way "faith" is used in the article. One would be tempted to think that these people wanted to use quack therapies instead of chemotherapy. Let's be clear. Chemotherapy is far from guaranteed to work, but there is a real and measurable possibility. Quack therapies don't work, so the probability of dying a painful death with them is virtually certain.
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #3
    The family was awarded custody of the boy at least for the time being.
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #4
    I know that at times an oncologist will go beyond reasonable efforts to fight death. There are times that the most humane thing in cancer is to accept that death may be the end reason and to use the remaining time left with family. As Bart said we don't know all the details but this child should have a right to have some say in his own treatment.
  • avatar Posted May 14, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #5
    @ KJ (momentsintime)There are times that the most humane thing in cancer is to accept that death may be the end reason and to use the remaining time left with family.
    I agree. What ticked me off in this case was this:

    even though the boy and his family wanted to try alternative approaches


    The truth is that there aren't any alternative approaches. At least, none that work. Canada's eco-hero Bob Hunter is reputed to have looked for alternative approaches. They have not only cost him a substantial amount of money, but also his life.

    Scientific, evidence-based medicine is far from perfect. But it does give one the best chances we have.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty