The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageThe North Pole is becoming warmer, the South Pole is becoming colder

Posted May 13, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele in Environment | 5 comments | 849 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
During the past few months, the Polarstern ploughed through the thick ice of the South Pole. Shortly before that, it was at the North Pole. It turns out that the North Pole is becoming warmer and that the South Pole is becoming colder.
During the past year, Antarctica has not become warmer, but colder. The driving force behind this cooling are ice cold deep water currents in the Antarctic Ocean, say about twenty oceanographers who travelled with the Polarstern, an international research boat.

Hein de Baar, researcher for the Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek der Zee (NIOZ - Dutch Institute for Research of the Sea) and associate professor at the University of Groningen coordinates the work of thirty of the researchers that were on board.

Noorderlicht, a leading scientific blog in The Netherlands, reports that De Baar says that graphs clearly show that the ice on the South Pole is gradually becoming thicker. However, he says, just plain common sense can tell you that as well. During the past year, it was virtually impossible to get through the ice.

De Baar has also seen with his own eyes that the ice at the other side of the planet, the North Pole, has broken all records in September 2007. He expects it not to be the last. "We think that in forty years time there will be no more ice at all on the North Pole after the summer. But, if we apply new calculations, it may well be from 2015 onwards. White sea-ice reflects sunlight. The pitch-black water that replaces the ice, absorbs that light, and this accelerates the melting."

De Baar's own research concentrates on iron. Iron is the only element that is really rare around the poles and algae (phytoplankton) need iron in order to convert carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, in nourishing sugars. This way, algae have a significant influence on the climate.

"This year, we have studied water columns of five kilometres high at the South Pole, There is a lot more iron than we had previously thought." Earlier, De Baar had experimented with adding iron to the water around Antarctica in order to stem global warming, but that failed. The iron particles sink immediately and it is far too dark for algae down there.

Doing research at the Poles is not an easy enterprise. The Polar Stern carries about 50 researchers who often work in shifts, 8 hours on, 8 hours off. They have to carry absolutely everything they need for their research, for food, for everything else. "But, " says De Baar, "it is very stimulating". He just loves his job.
article:254633:10::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted May 13, 2008 by  Brant David McLaughlin
    #1
    Excellent reporting, Bart.

    I've mentioned these Polar opposite effects several times in my own writing but the AGW crowd doesn't care.

    Guess it's just too Polarizing.
  • Connie M (Catana) Posted May 13, 2008 by  Connie M (Catana)
    #2
    This kind of story just confuses the heck out of the anti-warming bunch. What to believe? What to believe? Life is just so confusing. The science of weather and climate change is too complex for them to take it in, so they look for simple answers.

    So this finding is part of a conspiracy -- right?
  • avatar Posted May 13, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #3
    I had type a few "funny" reactions, but I won't put them here. This type of research is indeed confusing to a lot of people. I don't need to add to that.

    Let's be clear. The ice on South Pole is thickening because of cold water currents, not because of some "global cooling" effect. Although I am a global warming sceptic myself, I don't see this as my religion. I am sceptical because I feel I have reasons for that position. This research is not one of those reasons.
  • Connie M (Catana) Posted May 13, 2008 by  Connie M (Catana)
    #4
    That comment wasn't aimed at you, Bart. I hope you didn't take it that way. I'm not at all a skeptic about climate change, but there are still too many unkowns to say for sure that it will mean warming. The warming/cooling debate has been going on for a long time and though it's currently leaning toward warming, what's going on now is just a tiny blip in the big picture. What I was trying to say (not very well) is that every time there's a major finding, such as the opposite trends at the poles, someone thinks it's proof of whatever it is they believe (or as disproof of the other side's position).
  • avatar Posted May 13, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #5
    @ Connie M (Catana)
    That comment wasn't aimed at you, Bart. I hope you didn't take it that way. I'm not at all a skeptic about climate change, but there are still too many unkowns to say for sure that it will mean warming. The warming/cooling debate has been going on for a long time and though it's currently leaning toward warming, what's going on now is just a tiny blip in the big picture. What I was trying to say (not very well) is that every time there's a major finding, such as the opposite trends at the poles, someone thinks it's proof of whatever it is they believe (or as disproof of the other side's position).
    No Connie, I didn't take it as directed at me. But it did make me change what I wrote as a first reaction. I entirely agree with you. That is my standpoint. The evidence points towards warming, but we simply do not yet know what it actually means. And that is the main thing I have against the global warming brigade. They don't know it either, since they use the same data, but that doesn't stop them from predicting disaster in the near future. And then there's the may/might association. Give me a break. Anything and everything may/might happen. That doesn't make it likely ^_^.

    Who knows? Things being what they are, there might be a big tear in the earth's mantle tomorrow that will swallow Toronto whole. Halleluja.

    I don't think I'll let my sleep over it ^_^

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?