The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

Man Accused Of Burning, Whipping and Urinating On a 7 Year Old Boy

Posted May 8, 2008 by  Susan Duclos in Crime | 4 comments | 167 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
Michelle Henry and her boyfriend David J. Privette are accused of abusing her 7 year old son, after the child reported being abused by the boyfriend while his mother watched, to a teacher at Early Childhood Center in December 2007 and on March 4, 2008.
The child alleges that the boyfriend beat him with a belt, burned him with a cigarette and urinated on his head.

School officials reported the abuse to Department of Social Services (DSS), but police were not notified by the agency until 13 days later. That was when teachers discovered burn marks on the boy’s genitals, pelvis and buttocks.


Superintendent of Schools Robert Sullivan later issued an apology to the boy for the school system’s delay in acting.

The couple plead not guilty in Superior Court yesterday and are both being held without bail, pending a dangerousness hearing.

The mother, Michelle L. Henry, 30, is being charged with assault and battery causing injury to a child, reckless endangerment of a child and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon on a child.

Her boyfriend, David Privette, 23, is being charged with mayhem, three counts of assault and battery causing bodily injury to a child, two counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon on a child, two counts of indecent assault and battery on a child under 14 and intimidation of a witness.

Originally, at the first dangerousness hearing held in the Wareham District Court in March, Privette was deemed dangerous and held without bail, but Henry was not.

A grand jury later indicted the two, formally moving the case to Superior Court, where Superior Court Judge Paul E. Troy, ordered them both to be held without bail.

There will be another hearing at a later date to decide whether the couple should stay locked up pending trial.

Gary J. Russell who is the Middleborough's chief of police, expressed anger at the school as well as the DSS saying the police should have been notified immediately, which is what prompted the School Superintendent's public apology to the boy.

Plymouth District Attorney Timothy J. Cruz is preparing legislation to require such allegations to be reported to the law enforcement immediately and he says, "This is a terrible, terrible case. Somebody made a huge mistake."

His anger stems from the fact that the child first reported being abused, via whippings with a belt, to school officials back in December and was left in the care of his mother to suffer more abuse until March 17, 2008, when the police stepped in to the case.
article:254442:5::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted May 8, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #1
    How in the world do these monsters even want to do this to a child, let alone the female to its own child.
    What horrible evil creatures they are.
    They should be locked up for the rest of their lives.
  • avatar Posted May 8, 2008 by  Helena Handbasket
    #2
    "This is a terrible, terrible case. Somebody made a huge mistake."

    Inexcusable negligence and agency response. Not surprising just inexcusable.

    I wish everyone meaning harm to children would simply drop dead in their tracks so we don't have to read the results of their depravity.

    I don't even like to say good article Susan, but there you have it.
  • avatar Posted May 8, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #3
    @ Helena Handbasket
    I wish everyone meaning harm to children would simply drop dead in their tracks so we don't have to read the results of their depravity.


    A voice of reason
  • avatar Posted May 9, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #4
    @ Helena Handbasket
    "This is a terrible, terrible case. Somebody made a huge mistake."

    Inexcusable negligence and agency response. Not surprising just inexcusable.

    I wish everyone meaning harm to children would simply drop dead in their tracks so we don't have to read the results of their depravity.

    I don't even like to say good article Susan, but there you have it.


    I know.. some of these just make me sick, but the only way to learn from other people's mistakes, is to show the mistake.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?