The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post Blog»     Post News ($)»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Live Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageA new revolution in the making for your computer: the memristor has arrived

Posted May 7, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele in Technology | 6 comments | 304 views
Advertising
Forty years after it was predicted, it has finally arrived: the memristor, the fourth fundamental element of electronic circuits. Researchers predict that this will enable future computers to boot substantially faster than now.
All computer owners know it: it takes forever and a day before your computer starts. Why does it take that long? Because the working memory of present-day computers consists of so-called dynamic RAM (Random Access Memory) that loses its contents when power is cut off. Every time one restarts a computer, all fundamental operating instructions and data must be loaded in memory. That takes time.

A new electronic component, the memristor or memory resistor will change all that. This thing remembers the state it was in before power was cut off. That saves quite a bit of time, especially when starting the computer. In this week's Nature, researchers of the Hewlett-Packard Lab in Palo Alto, California, describe their experiments with a prototype of the memristor.

The existence of the memristor was already predicted in 1971 by -still young- electronics engineer Leon Chua who worked at the University of Calfornia, Berkeley. He was, apparently quite litterally, monkeying around with the complex mathematics that describe how the four fundamental variables of electronic systems (electricity, voltage, charge and magnetic flux) behave in the three basic components of electronics that were known at the time: resistor, capacitor and induction element. Combining these three elements in different ways, makes it possible to create electronic circuits of different types.

Using mathematical logic, Chua came to the conclusion that there had to be a fourth element, an element with the rather interesting property that it remembers the charge that passed through it before power was cut off. He called this theoretical fundamental element a "memristor", an abbreviation of memory resistor. However, is was unclear how the element had to look and what it's physical properties should be.

Now, nearly forty years later, Stan Williams and his colleagues from HP Labs are describing a prototype of Chua's memristor. They discovered it quite by accident, during experiments to make nano switches, tiny switches, with minuscule amounts of titanium oxide. The behaviour of the nano-elements seemed unexpectedly bizarre and after some puzzling Williams and his colleagues determined that they looked very much like Chua's memristors.

The memristors built by the group consist of a sandwich of titanium oxide (a semiconductor) and two extremely thin layers of platinum. They can't be seen with the naked eye: they have a thickness of 5 nanometres or approximately one ten thousandth of the thickness of a human hair. This creates a lot more space on a chip considering that the smallest electronics components today are about 45 nanometres, and the limits of the miniaturization are slowly coming nearer, since there is not really any possibility to go below 20 nanometres with current technology. This means that Moore's Law would no longer be valid. Of course, it has never been valid in the first place, it was nothing more than a prediction that happens to be vaguely correct if one looks not too closely, not unlike the prophecies of the Bible or Nostradamus.

Thanks to the memristor, miniaturization should be able to continue for a while longer. Williams and his colleagues already used it to build a functioning transistor that is smaller than conventional transistors by connecting two memristors. But that's not all. According to Williams, the memristor enables us to create fundamentally different elements than the current three that already exist. "It gives us a much larger palette to choose from," says Williams.

In an accompanying commentary in the same issue of Nature, nano-expert James Tour writes that it'll probably take a while before memristors will actually become common in the electronics industry. Alternatives for the "good old transistor" are often looked at with some suspicion by those involved. The industry will first want to see some large-scale, well-functioning examples, writes Tour. "But once that is done, the race for smaller components will accelerate."

Leon Chua who is approaching retirement is very happy, "I did not dare to hope that I would live long enough to see this actually happening," he told the press agency AP.

From Stanley Williams et al: "The Missing Memristor Found" in Nature, May 1, 2008 and James Tour: "The Fourth Element" in Nature, May 1, 2008.

2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted May 7, 2008 by  Maverick
    #1
    Great...now maybe I can get my computer to boot up in 1 second instead of the 90 odd seconds it takes. But I guess, it will take time to reach us.
  • avatar Posted May 7, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #2
    @ Maverick
    Great...now maybe I can get my computer to boot up in 1 second instead of the 90 odd seconds it takes. But I guess, it will take time to reach us.
    That is the claim. I doubt it, honestly. Given the unreliability of current operating systems, it would be "at the most" useful as a basis for an updated version of the ROM-based operating systems we used to have in the past.
  • avatar Posted May 8, 2008 by  cgull
    #3
    Great find, I hope they can mass market it soon.
    @ Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    That is the claim. I doubt it, honestly. Given the unreliability of current operating systems, it would be "at the most" useful as a basis for an updated version of the ROM-based operating systems we used to have in the past.
    I bought a used mac book recently, it starts much faster than Windows and also shuts down faster.
  • avatar Posted May 8, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #4
    @ cgull
    Great find, I hope they can mass market it soon. I bought a used mac book recently, it starts much faster than Windows and also shuts down faster.
    Good to know. Personally, I didn't agree at all with the article's claim that slow starts are due to this memory issue. Theoretically they are, but in practice, we are talking fractions of a second. The real reason why it takes so long is horribly bad programming.
  • avatar Posted May 8, 2008 by  cgull
    #5
    @ Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    Good to know. Personally, I didn't agree at all with the article's claim that slow starts are due to this memory issue. Theoretically they are, but in practice, we are talking fractions of a second. The real reason why it takes so long is horribly bad programming.
    I agree some programs takes too much time and memory to start and work and that hinders other programs. Still a long way to go to make them work perfectly. If it is all internet based then it might help a little. I use mostly web based programs, can't trust Microsoft.
  • avatar Posted May 8, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #6
    @ cgull
    I agree some programs takes too much time and memory to start and work and that hinders other programs. Still a long way to go to make them work perfectly. If it is all internet based then it might help a little. I use mostly web based programs, can't trust Microsoft.
    TO give you an example. The accounting software I wrote for the Amiga was multithreaded, multitasking and multiuser. It was completely windows-driven and mouse-driven and it was able to handle the complete accounting of a fairly large company (theoretically even Coca-Cola and GM, although they would have wanted some extra functions ^_^). The whole package fit on two 1.44MB disks, with room to spare. It also used only a single data file. Why was it so small and so efficient? Mostly because it was written in assembler, in its entirety. The other reason was that the operating system was a dream. It was extremely well written, and the documentation was the best I have ever seen for any operating system. Microsoft's documentation doesn't even reach the level of a promotional flyer in comparison.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty