The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post Blog»     Post News ($)»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Live Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageRasmussen: 58 Per cent Think Obama Denounced Wright For Political Convenience

Posted May 2, 2008 by  S. D. in Politics | 12 comments | 468 views
Advertising
Rasmussen Reports, in their May 2 release, say that 58 per cent of respondents in their latest poll say they think Barack Obama only denounced Jeremiah Wright because of "political convenience."
Months after the firestorm of media attention focused on Jeremiah Wright's controversial sermons which were blasted across the Internet and every news media outlet, Barack Obama who has called Wright "like family" and previously refused to denounce the man, did exactly that after Wright went on a mini-media tour last weekend capped by a press conference at the National Press Club on Monday and made further controversial statements.

Many thought Obama said too little and it was too late by then.

Rasmussen Reports conducted a national telephone survey which found that 58 percent of respondents believe Barack Obama only denounced Wright because it was politically convenient and not out of legitimate outrage.

Only 30 percent of those asked believed Obama was outraged.

52 percent of those surveyed believe that Obama was not truly surprised by Wright's views while 32 percent believe he was.

56 percent believe that Obama, at least somewhat, “shares some of Pastor Wright’s controversial views about the United States.” Those figures when broken down show that 26 percent say that it is "very likely" Obama shares those views and 24 percent believe it is "not very likely" that Obama shares his pastor's views.

Broken down by political party, we see that 74 percent of Republicans questioned said that it was somewhat or very likely that Obama shares some of Wright’s views. That view is shared by 48 percent of Democrats and 49 percent of those not affiliated with either party.

Democrats are evenly divided as to whether or not Obama was surprised by Wright’s comments on Monday. Republicans overwhelmingly reject that notion. Among those not affiliated with either major party, 36% say Obama was surprised while 45% disagree.

Just 36% of Democrats believe outrage was the motivation for Obama to denounce his former Pastor. That view is shared by 38% of unaffiliated voters and 16% of Republicans.


This further confirms what the latest polls showed yesterday, where Clinton shows a slight surge and Obama is losing favorable ratings just days before the next two primaries in Indiana and North Carolina.

In another Rasmussen Report, the daily Presidential Tracking Poll shows that before Wright's recent press conference, John McCain and Barack Obama were tied with each receiving 46 percent and now John McCain now leads Barack Obama 48 percent to 42 percent.

When pitted against Hillary Clinton, McCain garners 45 Percent and Clinton 44 percent.

On the morning of Wright’s press conference, Obama did three points better than Clinton against McCain. Now, Clinton outperforms Obama by five for a swing of eight points in just four days.



While Clinton's two point lead in the Democratic Presidential Nomination, where she has 46 percent and he has 44 percent, is statistically insignificant, Rasmussen takes into account that it represents a ten-point swing since Wright’s press conference. Before Wright appeared at the National Press Club, Obama led Clinton by eight points.

It is undeniable that the Wright controversy has hurt Barack Obama, but Obama seemed to be coming back from it before Wright's mini tour and latest words and although Barack Obama did denounce not just the words this time, but also the man to a point, these numbers are showing that it might just have been "too little too late".

There are many months to go and in the world of politics, one week can seem like one year and one major mistake can turn the polls around, but since the next set of primaries is but four days away, the latest surveys and polls provide a window into the potential outcome on May 6.

3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  666divine
    #1
    I don't hold that against Obama, I think he did what any politician would have done for political gain.
  • S. D. Posted May 2, 2008 by  S. D.
    #2
    @ 666divine
    I don't hold that against Obama, I think he did what any politician would have done for political gain.


    Yes, but he keeps running on a platform of "change" and not running a "typical" campaign and by not denouncing Wright immediately after the first sermons were made public, he has hurt himself.
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  666divine
    #3
    @ S. D.
    Yes, but he keeps running on a platform of "change" and not running a "typical" campaign and by not denouncing Wright immediately after the first sermons were made public, he has hurt himself.

    I think that you would like to believe so or perhaps hope to influence or convince others to believe that he has been hurt by this. And I am saying this only because it seems to me that you would like nothing more than to see Obama taken down.
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  Helena Handbasket
    #4
    They were flogging these numbers to death in the MSM yesterday. Analyzing every nuance, word and cause.

    I believe he and his handlers have blundered enough with non-disclosures and hinky associations to colour the entire campaign. If and when BHObama crashes and burns he need only look around the room to understand why.
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #5
    There's no doubt in my mind that this whole thing has been orchestrated.
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  Helena Handbasket
    #6
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    There's no doubt in my mind that this whole thing has been orchestrated.


    To what end in your mind Mr. Tippitt? What is their objective? I know my thinking and wonder about your thinking here.........
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  Cyber Pastor
    #7
    My thinking isn't Mike's thinking, but I believe they (bho vs. Rev wrong) both think this is the best way to get this subject behind them and move on. Rev. wrong is a smart man and knows that it's in bho's best interest to denounce his mentor, and Rev. wrong is taking one for the team, while getting plenty of national attention and paid speaking engagements.

    However, with the new media, we will not let this go away and we will make sure that wrong is never right!

    There's my humble opinion that that I know you didn't ask for HH. I seem to get in trouble with Mrs. CP for doing that, guess I will never learn.
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #8
    Amazing that 42% can't or refuse, to see what is right in front of their eyes.
  • avatar Posted May 3, 2008 by  Helena Handbasket
    #9
    There's my humble opinion that that I know you didn't ask for HH. I seem to get in trouble with Mrs. CP for doing that, guess I will never learn.


    hehe! .. no doubt. 8 )

    Thanks for your viewpoint CP. I believe it is a more purposeful, ominous, inflaming objective. I hope I'm wrong and it is just about generating some cash for an already flush Wright. Of course with the cash generation via speaking engagements the message is still receiving the kind of mileage and attention it doesn't deserve. Maybe Spike and the good Rev can tag team hate across the nation.
  • S. D. Posted May 3, 2008 by  S. D.
    #10
    @ 666divine
    I think that you would like to believe so or perhaps hope to influence or convince others to believe that he has been hurt by this. And I am saying this only because it seems to me that you would like nothing more than to see Obama taken down.


    My opinion isn't the one stated in the dozen or so polls, they didn't call me. I listed links and all show the same thing, I think the data speaks for itself.
  • S. D. Posted May 3, 2008 by  S. D.
    #11
    @ LewWaters
    Amazing that 42% can't or refuse, to see what is right in front of their eyes.


    Isn't it? It is called denial. Tuesday will definitely be interesting, as of two weeks ago, Obama was leading NC with double digits, now he might just squeak a win out but Indiana is a lost cause for him.
  • Hargrove Posted May 4, 2008 by  Hargrove
    #12
    I think the American public is rising to the challenge, showing how smart they are.

    It makes sense that he would denounce Wright for political reasons, with less regret, since Wright put him in a tight spot.

    I was impressed that he didn't distance himself in the first instance since it clearly would have been a response to disapproval of Wright. I hate the way politicians throw away their friends away as soon as some of their flaws surface. But Wright, God bless him, even threw away his defense, namely, that it was soundbites, and he repeated what he said in the "sound bites," and more. It was quite amazing.

    Whether it was politically motivated or not, I'm sure Barack was telling the truth when he said that wright inferred that he didn't mean what he said, in front of the press club, and that was enough.

    Barack risked his bid for the presidency to stand by a friend, and that friend trampled all over the gesture.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty