 |
Canada's forests are a major contributor to global warming, blame the beetles
The large pine forests in Western Canada are suffering from a gigantic beetle plague. As a result, they do not fix carbon but actually lose about 270 million tons of carbon.
Large parts of the forests are not green, but yellow. We can thank billions of Dendroctonus ponderosae, the pine tree beetle, for that. The name says it all. Dendroctonus stands for "tree-killer" and ponderosae means "pine tree". So, this should be a pine tree killing beetle. And it is.
The yellow of the trees is nothing else than an indication that the tree is dying. And the trees are dying off with great enthusiasm. The little critters accomplish this by living under the bark of the trees, something the trees can't handle.
These beetles are nothing abnormal, they are a normal part of life in those forests. Better, occasional large plagues are also part of normal life. However, according to Werner Kurz and his colleagues in Nature, the current plague is at least 10 times worse than normal and they blame, what else, global warming.
The problem is that the release of carbon from are generally ignored in large climate models. No longer. Kurz and colleagues have calculated that the plague causes approximately a net amount of 36 grammes of carbon to be released per square metre per year. Since the forested area is approximately 374,000 square kilometres or more than 11 times the size of The Netherlands, that amounts to an accumulated total of about 270 million tons of carbon over the period from 2000 until 2020. That just happens to be the amount carbon that Canada should reduce from current levels. Already hard to achieve without little beetles (they are no more than 5mm long), but essentially impossible with them.
-
Bad beetles! However, the key question could by Why is the beetle infestation 10 times worse than normal? If not climate change, then what?
-
They do blame global warming. The theory is that the winters were too warm to kill off the beetles in large enough numbers.
-
@ Bart B. Van Bockstaele
They do blame global warming. The theory is that the winters were too warm to kill off the beetles in large enough numbers. I get that and concur ; however, this comment in your story they blame, what else, global warming.
leads to me to think you do not agree, if you don't do you have an alternate theory?
-
@ Bob Ewing
I get that and concur ; however, this comment in your story leads to me to think you do not agree, if you don't do you have an alternate theory? LOL, you know me well. I would indeed have been quite capable of suggesting something in that way. But, just as Sigmund said: sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. There was no hidden meaning this time ^_^
-
@ Bob Ewing
I get that and concur ; however, this comment in your story leads to me to think you do not agree, if you don't do you have an alternate theory?
If I try on a pair of shoes and they're too tight, how much theorizing do I need to do about that?
Put the pipes down and hop off your shrooms, people.
Look--how convenient for Gorey Al: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/04/30/eaclimate130.xml
-
And by the way, this excerpt from the above article (the link I posted): the warmest year ever recorded in 1998.
is a boldfaced lie. Or else it's blatant incompetency, as you can verify here.
-
There is a lot of confusion about global warming. Yes, it has become colder this year. So what? A one-year jump has no meaning whatsoever, climate-wise. What is important in climate, is the trend. Is the temperature more or less graudually rising or is it getting lower over period of, say, 50 years or so.
Climate is not the same thing as weather. I am a global warming sceptic myself, which is precisely why Bob asked me that question.
I most definitely don't share the doomsday scenario. So what, if there is global warming? We'll adapt. Nature will adapt. It always has. It may not adapt the way certain people like, but it'll adapt regardless.
-
which is precisely why Bob asked me that question.
I most definitely don't share the doomsday scenario. So what, if there is global warming? We'll adapt. Nature will adapt. It always has. It may not adapt the way certain people like, but it'll adapt regardless. exactly and a sound answer as anticipated. i agree Life will adapt.
-
@ Bob Ewing
exactly and a sound answer as anticipated. i agree Life will adapt. See, we *can* agree! Is that not the scientific method? We start with vastly different interpretations, but the more data becomes available, the more everybody has to acknowledge what is really going on, and converges to the same view, however different it is from the original views. That is what is so wonderful about science!
-
Interesting article, Bart and the comments are just as interesting!
-
Thanks for your nice comment Debra!
-
Has anybody yet suggested tree farms to replace our forests,,?
-
@ laurel dick
Has anybody yet suggested tree farms to replace our forests,,? Yes. Actually "tree farms" are commonplace. That is the reason that the claim that forests are being saved by using less paper is quite ridiculous. Most, if not all, paper does not come from real forests, it comes from what I like to call "paper plantations", tree farms if you like.
Add a Comment
|
 |
|
 |