The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageParents of KIA Son Seek Damages from Anti-War T-shirt Seller

Posted May 1, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence in Politics | 7 comments | 185 views
Advertising
Robin and Michael Read lost a son in Iraq then had to face anti-war merchants profiting from his death by using his name.
Robin and Michael Read filed a lawsuit in response to the use of their son's name on an anti-war shirt being sold for profit by Dan Frazier of Flagstaff Arizona. The lawsuit states that Frazier should not be allowed to profit by using dead soldiers' names without permission.

Dan Frazier contests that if the lawsuit is ruled in the Read's favor that it would be a violation of his free speech rights.

"We think it will be clear that this is political expression and not done for profit," said Lee Phillips, Frazier's attorney.

The Bush Lied- They Died t-shirts were on sale at Frazier's online website CarryaBigSticker.com

The Reads are seeking damages to be paid out among the surviving family members of the slain soldiers used on the t-shirt. The total amount to be paid to the heirs of the soldiers will be $4 billion in compensatory damages and $36.5 billion of punitive damages. The original lawsuit was for only $10 million but only listed the Reads has plaintiffs.

Frazier is attempting to get the case moved to Arizona where he already has the favorable ear of a Judge and is challenging an already existing law in Arizona that makes the use of a deceased soldier's name for "commercial purposes" a misdemeanor.
article:254123:9::0

2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted May 1, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #1
    I heard this on the radio earlier. I hope they win.
  • avatar Posted May 1, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #2
    Ditto
  • skeptikool Posted May 1, 2008 by  skeptikool
    #3
    If they would not be so riled that some should profit from war, they might do better giving support to a pro-war T-shirt seller.

    No more blood for oil. I doubt many believe lies weren't told to contrive this war.
  • avatar Posted May 1, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #4
    Okay but that doesn't matter, the man is using the name of a dead person to promote an agenda and reaping profits from it. This isn't about pro or con this is about taking the advantage of the dead for profit. It is sick. These men are not alive to give thier permission for an agenda and their families don't want the pain from this.
  • skeptikool Posted May 1, 2008 by  skeptikool
    #5
    The original lawsuit was for only $10 million but only listed the Reads has plaintiffs.


    We're agreed on the matter of profit.
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #6
    Disgusting to use someone who is deceased for profit.

    Good story, Sam.
  • avatar Posted May 2, 2008 by  T.A.Torrence
    #7
    @ skeptikool
    If they would not be so riled that some should profit from war, they might do better giving support to a pro-war T-shirt seller.

    No more blood for oil. I doubt many believe lies weren't told to contrive this war.

    Blood for oil, have you seen gas prices lately? Or the rising cost of plastics? Our country runs on oil, for now. I don't believe lies were said, oil was one of many reasons for going.

    But I think we can agree, no more blood for politics, eh?

    Anyway, you are off topic. This is about a sick @$$ who is taking advantage of my dead brothers-in-arms, most likely against their wishes, and definately without their approval. Last I checked it was ilegal to use someone's name and image without their permission. Here is a good example. You should add this to the story Sammy.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty