The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageStudy Suggest Trees Lower Children's Asthma Risk

Posted May 1, 2008 by  Bob Ewing in Health | 4 comments | 183 views
Advertising
A recent study by a team of researchers at Columbia University suggests that children who grow up on tree lined streets have a better chance of being healthy.
Columbia University researchers have completed a study that suggests that growing up on a tree-lined street is good for a child's health. Why, because asthma rates are lower in kids who grow up in leafy green neighbourhoods.

The CTV story says that the asthma rates among four- and five-year-olds in New York City fell by almost a quarter for every increase in tree density that measured 343 more trees per square kilometre.

The researchers examined asthma rates among 4 and 5 year olds, as well as asthma-related hospital admissions for kids up to age 15, in New York City and analyzed information from 42 health-service districts.

Next, they compared the information to city data from those same districts that outlined the number of trees, sources of pollution, population density and the ethnic makeup of the area.

Tree density did not affect the rates of asthma-related hospital admissions among older children when the researchers included other factors such as the children's proximity to sources of pollution, and their neighbourhood's population density and level of affluence. The study was published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

Trees may help decrease asthma rates because kids may be more inclined to play outside when there are a lot of trees in their neighbourhoods. Trees improve air quality by absorbing carbon dioxide and release oxygen.

Data on the prevalence of asthma among children aged 4-5 years and on hospitalisations for asthma among children less than 15 years old were available for 42 health service catchment areas within New York City.

Street tree counts were provided by the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation. The proximity to pollution sources, sociodemographic characteristics and population density for each area were also measured.

"Our cross-sectional and ecological study does not permit inference that trees are causally related to the prevalence of childhood asthma at the individual level," the authors wrote.

"Future studies may be more robust if they are able to measure and control for characteristics of the home environment, such as the presence of allergens."

In the United States, asthma rates in children have grown 50 per cent between 1980 and 2000, particularly in poorer, urban communities; while in New York City, asthma is the main cause of hospital admission among kids under age 15.

In Canada, asthma affects about three million people.
article:254109:8::0

2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted May 1, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #1
    Interesting find. I wonder if your asthma is triggered by OAK, would that be a good tree to live around?

    I'm deathly allergic to oak pollen, although it doesn't trigger my asthma - dust from hay and dirt sends me into a near death episode. Never had problems as a kid only in my young adult years (early twenties) did I find that I couldn't breathe after mowing the grass in dry climates or going to festivals where they used hay or dirt (rodeos, beer fests, etc).

    I would weeze and cough and just about pass out. Finally went to the hospital and I guess I was getting no OXYGEN - asthma! I have 1 attack every 5 years...LOL. Go figure (its cuz I stay away from a lot of what triggers it).

    So I'm wondering if someone has asthma induced by allergies to trees.......would they live by trees? mmmmmmmm
  • avatar Posted May 1, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #2
    So I'm wondering if someone has asthma induced by allergies to trees.......would they live by trees? mmmmmmmm
    I probably would not but...
  • avatar Posted May 1, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #3
    It makes sense in some ways, except for the fact that if trees are the basis OF an allergy...well, the I'd be living in a field w/out any trees around the home!
  • avatar Posted May 1, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #4
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    It makes sense in some ways, except for the fact that if trees are the basis OF an allergy...well, the I'd be living in a field w/out any trees around the home!

    That is what i would most likely do as well.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty