The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article image'Mad King' Ludwig's Mysterious Death In 1886 Was Murder, Historian Claims

Posted Apr 29, 2008 by  Johnny Simpson in World | 7 comments | 211 views
Next in World
Related News
Advertising
The 122-year-old mystery surrounding the death of King Ludwig II, the Mad King of Bavaria, has taken new twists after an expert claimed he was murdered, and a Bavarian banker swore an oath that the coat Ludwig wore before his death had bullet holes in it.
A brief recap on this age-old mystery, and why it has captivated so many for so long:

On June 10th, 1886, King Ludwig II was deposed from the Bavarian throne and officially declared incapable of executing his powers, due to what the four reporting psychiatrists headed by Professor Bernhard von Gudden described as paranoia, although no medical examination had taken place. His father's younger brother Prince Luitpold was complicit in the action and was declared regent.

Three days later, on June 13th at 6:30 pm, Ludwig was out walking with Professor Gudden and asked him to take a walk around nearby Lake Starnberg with no guards present. Gudden agreed, and told the guards not to follow them.

The two men never returned. King Ludwig and Professor Gudden were found dead floating near the shore of Lake Starnberg at 11:30 pm.

Based on factual evidence and Ludwig's state of mind at the time, many suspected that the King first murdered Professor Gudden, the object of his rage who had declared him insane and taken his throne from him, then drowned himself. A murder-suicide. It would have explained both bodies floating in the water.

It also fit perfectly with a statement the distraught Ludwig himself made shortly before his death:

"It's not so much losing my throne that bothers me. It's being declared insane that really stings."

Many others thought conspiracy, greed and foul play took center stage.

They may just be right.

Today, the History News Network reported that famed art historian-turned-sleuth Siegfried Wichmann, the leading authority on Bavarian paintings from the late 19th century, says contemporary portraits of Ludwig II prove that far from killing himself in a fit of melancholy, Ludwig was assassinated to put an end his extravagant spending.

Mr. Wichmann published a hitherto unseen photograph of a portrait of the king painted only hours after his death. The portrait shows what Mr Wichmann says is blood oozing from the corner of Ludwig’s mouth. “King Ludwig cannot have drowned. This is blood from the lungs and there is no water in it,” Mr Wichmann insisted on Wednesday.

For Wichmann, it was a terrible reminder of his own wounds from the Second World War, when he was struck in the lung by shrapnel and coughed up the same thick blood.

In his new book, 'The Killing of King Ludwig,' Mr. Wichmann claims that in the 1960s he was approached by a lawyer with three paintings, one of which featured Ludwig immediately after his death. He said that the face in the portrait featured no signs of rigor mortis. Instead, in the corner of the gaping mouth, the artist painted glutinous blood stains.

For the aging art-detective, there is only one explanation for Ludwig’s wounds: he was shot. "The killing was carried out by an assassin,” he said. "It was all about money."

Mr. Wichmann is not the only one coming forth with new evidence involving the age-old mystery.

Last month, Detlev Utermöhle, a Bavarian banker, made a sworn statement claiming that he had seen the coat Ludwig was wearing on the day of his death, and that it contained two bullet holes.

He said the coat belonged to Josephine Gräfin von Wrbna-Kaunitz, a countess who managed assets belonging to Ludwig’s family and had showed it to guests at a party half a century ago.

A secret Bavarian society known as the Guglmänner, whose members dress in capes and hoods and claim to be guardians of the German monarchy, has long questioned the official version of his death.

Calls for Ludwig’s body to be exhumed and given a modern autopsy have now grown louder. Yet despite the development of imaging techniques that would leave Ludwig's remains undisturbed, Ludwig’s family has consistently rejected pleas for a modern examination that might settle the mystery.

“There are still people in powerful positions today who don’t want to recognize these facts,” said Mr Wichmann. “Who knows why?”

So, were the mysterious twin deaths murder-suicide, or an assassin's foul deed?

It appears, barring any miraculous change of heart by the Wittelsbach family, that Ludwig's death will continue to remain as mysterious as ever.

Wikipedia has a surprisingly good account of the King's life, deposing and events surrounding his death here. There are also many wild rumors that have flown over the years. A Google search turned up over 450,000 hits.

King Ludwig II is remembered as a brilliant architect who designed and oversaw the construction of the Linderhof, Herrenchiemsee and Neuschwanstein Castles, the last of which Walt Disney chose as his company's logo in 1940.

He was also a great patron of the arts. Upon his ascension to the throne at the age of eighteen, one of his first acts was to rescue the debt-ridden and despondent composer Richard Wagner, who was rumored to be very depressed and suicidal at the time.

Had it not been for Ludwig, the world would have never known some of the greatest opera music ever written. Like 'der Ring des Nibelungen,' better known as 'What's Opera, Doc?' to you classical music aficionados.

On the flip side, he was a raging eccentric who had full banquets served to him at dinner parties for which he was the only attendee physically present (though he often spoke at those soirees to Napoleon and Marie Antoinette), staged insane bacchanals with REAL guests, and was also rumored to be a raging closet homosexual.

Like the mystery of his death, we may never really know the facts about that last rumor either. But the other ones are pretty well documented.

Rest In Peace, O Great Mad King.

Auf Wiedersein.
article:253954:9::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Apr 29, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #1
    Very interesting, TMK.
  • avatar Posted Apr 29, 2008 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #2
    Is it actually possible to drown yourself? Wouldn't there be an instinctual reflex that would make it virtually impossible to just open your mouth and breath in water? I find it hard to believe he killed himself in such a manner.......and it is strange that after all of these many, many years the family wouldn't allow the truth to come out and let an autopsy be performed. What would it matter now? Unless someone inherited alot of money that they shouldn't have because of his premature death......is that the reason TMK?
    Why would they not want anyone to know the truth?
  • avatar Posted Apr 29, 2008 by  Johnny Simpson
    #3
    Pam, You had to know the whole situation to even think it possible. Check the Wiki and other links. This one's still being raged about 122 years after the fact, so that should give you some idea how twisted this all is.

    To be honest, I ran that one around in my head for years before concluding like I did. Knowing Ludwig's character, possible mental instability, his despondency at losing his throne, and his rage at Professor Gudden who declared him insane, it seemed the answer that made the most sense.

    After being thoroughly despondent, then exhausted after drowning his nemesis, how hard does it seem to believe that he could just give up and drown himself?

    Wasn't just web surfing research, either. I read a half-dozen books on the guy after I found out more about him and what he achieved in his life. That's why I took his monkier. That, and I'm partial to madmen anyway. Aren't you?

    Like I said, the debate rages on. CSI: Cold Case would have a real problem with this one, LOL!

    Peace. TMK.
  • avatar Posted Apr 29, 2008 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #4
    @ Johnny Simpson
    Pam, You had to know the whole situation to even think it possible. Check the Wiki and other links. This one's still being raged about 122 years after the fact, so that should give you some idea how twisted this all is.

    To be honest, I ran that one around in my head for years before concluding like I did. Knowing Ludwig's character, possible mental instability, his despondency at losing his throne, and his rage at Professor Gudden who declared him insane, it seemed the answer that made the most sense.

    After being thoroughly despondent, then exhausted after drowning his nemesis, how hard does it seem to believe that he could just give up and drown himself?

    Wasn't just web surfing research, either. I read a half-dozen books on the guy after I found out more about him and what he achieved in his life. That's why I took his monkier. That, and I'm partial to madmen anyway. Aren't you?
    Like I said, the debate rages on. CSI: Cold Case would have a real problem with this one, LOL!

    Peace. TMK.

    Yes, most definitely. It seems to be a strange trait of mine, one that I wouldn't change, but can be a bit of a problem from time to time - Sanity is soooo overrated! hahahahaha
  • avatar Posted Apr 29, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #5
    I don't know, I still think that the feasibility is there that he was murdered...we all know that conspiracies like this would've run rampent then anyways.
  • avatar Posted Apr 29, 2008 by  Johnny Simpson
    #6
    Like I said, Deb, you could go on and on.

    People have been doing just that about this case for 122 years. Since Sherlock Holmes was just a pup and Fu Manchu couldn't even grow a moustache yet.

    Think about that.
  • avatar Posted Apr 29, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #7
    @ Johnny Simpson
    Like I said, Deb, you could go on and on.

    People have been doing just that about this case for 122 years. Since Sherlock Holmes was just a pup and Fu Manchu couldn't even grow a moustache yet.

    Think about that.


    I will...and I will take your word for it because it's a topic that you do seem to know a bit about. I can't even say that I'd ever heard of him before today, and if I did...I've forgotten! :)

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?