The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageHawking: Life is likely on other planets but aliens are primitive

Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull) in Science | 14 comments | 427 views
Related News
Advertising
Stephen Hawking says we are not alone in the universe. There is life elsewhere in the universe but most likely they are primitive or unintelligent in nature, according to the celebrated scientist.
Renowned astrophysicist Hawking gave a speech yesterday at George Washington University in honor of NASA’s 50th anniversary. He believes there is alien life, but he doesn’t think they are intelligent creatures; otherwise we would have heard their broadcasts in space about alien life.

Hawkins suggested the following possible answers to whether there is extra terrestrial life in space:

1) There is no life elsewhere or
2) Maybe there is intelligent life elsewhere, even if they are smart enough to send broadcasts, they may be smart enough to make deadly weapons also. Meeting them may not be a good option for humans or
3) Primitive life is common place and intelligent life is fairly rare.

He thinks the third option is the most likely one.

He dispels stories about alien abductions and said most of the claims come from “weirdos” are highly unlikely that we will ever meet those alien creatures.

Even if we meet them, he warned about the alien encounters. Since their DNA will be vastly different than us, any infected disease will be lethal for humans.

The 66-year-old British cosmologist, who suffers from ALS and must speak through a mechanical device, firmly believes that for a human race to survive for another million years, we will have to boldly go where no one has gone before.

Hawking compared this space journey with the quest of Christopher Columbus in 1942, when many were opposed to his trip at that time.

"The discovery of the New World made a profound difference to the old. Just think we wouldn't have had a Big Mac or KFC."
article:253631:24::0
6 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #1
    He is an odd man
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #2
    Primitive life is common place and intelligent life is fairly rare.
    is Earth in this category?
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #3
    Odd that he would think any alien life would be primitive. Odd because of all the ancient art depicting men in flying craft long before we discovered flight.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #4
    @ Bob Ewing
    is Earth in this category?
    It has a combination :)



    @ LewWaters
    Odd that he would think any alien life would be primitive. Odd because of all the ancient art depicting men in flying craft long before we discovered flight.
    I think he meant if they were intelligent creatures, they would have been in contact with us by now. It is better for us if they are not too intelligent otherwise they may destroy us like we do other animals here.

    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    He is an odd man
    I don't think so, have you read his "A Brief History of Time" it is a great book.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #5
    Nah, just odd! LOL. If there is life beyond (so many theories, different 'evidence', pictures, stories), how can he say they are primitive?

    Or unintelligent?

    IF!

    No hon, I haven't read his book. I'm not a science gal, although I'm fascinated by the heavens and stars. I have a greater belief of existence-and if life on other planets exists and the gvt has a special secret, i'm confident that those beings possess some form of intelligence to travel and exist.

    Very good report gull.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Sheba
    #6
    He thinks the third option is the most likely one.


    Why does he think the third option is the most likely one?

    Like Nikki, I too have a greater belief of existence - "though the eye of sinful man the (Thy) glory may not see..."
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #7
    @ Sheba
    Why does he think the third option is the most likely one?

    Like Nikki, I too have a greater belief of existence - "though the eye of sinful man the (Thy) glory may not see..."
    He doesn't talk about religion, he just talks about species in other planets and star systems. If there is any life forms in our neighboring planets or moons, he says it will be primitive in nature. Besides his views can be wrong also, nobody has proof, he is just speculating.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Saikat Basu (Maverick)
    #8
    Man as always is full of his own worth. We are just a speck in this universe and perhaps an insignificant speck. We are a pretty advanced race and so far we haven't managed to reach Mars...it might be the case with other life forms too. Who knows, thats the great and exciting mystery.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #9
    @ Saikat Basu (Maverick)
    Man as always is full of his own worth. We are just a speck in this universe and perhaps an insignificant speck. We are a pretty advanced race and so far we haven't managed to reach Mars...it might be the case with other life forms too. Who knows, thats the great and exciting mystery.
    Unless we try and make an effort to go there, it will remain a mystery.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Brant David McLaughlin
    #10
    @ LewWaters
    Odd that he would think any alien life would be primitive. Odd because of all the ancient art depicting men in flying craft long before we discovered flight.


    Amen, Lew!

    And a very fine article, CGull.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #11
    @ Saikat Basu (Maverick)
    Man as always is full of his own worth. We are just a speck in this universe and perhaps an insignificant speck. We are a pretty advanced race and so far we haven't managed to reach Mars...it might be the case with other life forms too. Who knows, thats the great and exciting mystery.


    Well said!
  • atroxodisse Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  atroxodisse
    #12
    I think he's saying that if a race was as advanced as ours they would have discovered radio technology by now and we would have heard their radio broadcasts. Radio broadcasts travel across galaxies.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Theodora L. (Franklin)
    #13
    If you ask me, once we meet the aliens, we will be primitive compared to them.
  • avatar Posted Apr 22, 2008 by  Sheba
    #14
    @ Chris V. (cgull)
    He doesn't talk about religion, he just talks about species in other planets and star systems. If there is any life forms in our neighboring planets or moons, he says it will be primitive in nature. Besides his views can be wrong also, nobody has proof, he is just speculating.

    I understand that C. But I haven't read the article so don't know if he gave a justifiable reason for thinking number three is the most likely...
    3) Primitive life is common place and intelligent life is fairly rare.

    He thinks the third option is the most likely one.

    So just wondering what his reason or reasons are for speculating that number 3 is the most likely.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?