The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageUpcoming Airline Security Project: The Anti-Hijacking Safety Bracelet

Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos in Technology | 40 comments | 1000 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
With the controversy over the use of tasers still being hashed out in the media and public, a new device is being created by a company called Lamperd, that uses the same technology that is used in tasers, as a bracelet, to be worn on planes.
Electro-Muscular Disruption Technology (EMDT) has been used by law enforcement officials in the form of tasers, and not without controversy, especially when there has been a death to someone after having been tasered by police or law enforcement authorities.

EMDT devices use a high-voltage, low power charge of electricity to induce involuntary muscle contractions that cause temporary incapacitation.

Lamperd FTS has announced and even created a video (seen above) to show how the development of a new project they are working on.

The EMD Safety Bracelet is being created by Lamperd with intention of an Airline Security Project, and according to their promotional video, which uses footage of the 9/11 attacks on the word trade center in their beginning scenes, their project is in response to the billions of dollars being spent on airport security.

The video goes on to point out the systems already being worked on to improve security, then they show how critics say those measures won't wok effectively.

They lead into their idea by saying "no matter how sophisticated the technology is, the technology is only as good as the people using it".

They assert that once terrorists have boarded a flight, the pilots and crew are "the last line of defense," and how an Air Marshall could inadvertently cause more damage when shooting at a suspect by puncturing a hole in the plane or shooting a passenger by mistake, and the video gives illustrations of this happening.

Then comes the question and the point of the whole video, about 3 minutes and seven seconds into it, where they ask, "Is there a solution?"

YES!! There is, they say.

It starts when a passenger purchases a ticket, saying they can also be fitted with an Electronic ID Bracelet, that they will wear until they disembark the flight at their destination.

The promotional video claims this would make traveling much more convenient for the public, and replace the need to carry a ticket because it would contain all pertinent passenger information. This bracelet would also allow for tracking a person through the airport terminal, including the passenger's carry on luggage which would also be coded like the bracelet.

Lamperd Video
An illustration used in Lamperd's promotional video which shows how these devices could be activated by an airline crew member to render someone immobile.
image:39228:0::0


Then comes the kicker and the main purpose of the bracelet, it would also be equipped with an Electro-Muscular Disruption technology, which would allow crew members, using radio frequency transmitters, to "quickly and effectively subdue hijackers", by overriding the attackers nervous system rendering them completely immobile for several minutes.

Everyone feeling safer?

This video, according to the Lamperd website has already received 30,000 views.

With the raging controversy about law enforcement officials using Electro-Muscular Disruption Technology, via tasers, and questions of those devices being used inappropriately because of a lack of proper training about when and how to use them, is this idea going to cause further controversy by even suggesting that those not in the law enforcement field, be given that type of power.

Would it only be used against terrorists? How about unruly passengers or those that get a little drunk and loud?

Would individual airlines even consider the use of these devices and would any government across the world even consider letting them?

What do you think?
article:253492:12::0
4 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #1
    The more I think about this idea, the more I think someone has lost their mind. Just saying cause Ii tried not to put opinion in the actual article.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Helena Handbasket
    #2
    Everyone feeling safer?


    ...... uh, no ma'am.

    The first thing I thought was this is more about the passengers with three too many cocktails in the bloodstream, and an extra asshole gene.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #3
    @ Helena Handbasket
    ...... uh, no ma'am.

    The first thing I thought was this is more about the passengers with three too many cocktails in the bloodstream, and an extra asshole gene.


    LOL!!! Same here. I don't like this idea one bit, could you tell?
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #4
    Well it would be wonderful if there was a well trained person on every flight. If the person was a very calm and level headed person that could quickly think when was the proper time to activate the devise. Not just because someone was being a little unruly or had been served to many drinks.

    It would probably end up being used like the tasers are which many times is not good.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #5
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    Well it would be wonderful if there was a well trained person on every flight. If the person was a very calm and level headed person that could quickly think when was the proper time to activate the devise. Not just because someone was being a little unruly or had been served to many drinks.

    It would probably end up being used like the tasers are which many times is not good.


    Exactly, thanks for taking a look at this for me, as I told you in email, I respect your opinion and I cannot see how the pending issues of people that are trained to use these using them unwisely, would not be compounded by giving the crew, the power to use them.

    You have given me something to think about though with your comment about someone trained.

    Thanks again!
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #6
    @ Susan Duclos
    Exactly, thanks for taking a look at this for me, as I told you in email, I respect your opinion and I cannot see how the pending issues of people that are trained to use these using them unwisely, would not be compounded by giving the crew, the power to use them.

    You have given me something to think about though with your comment about someone trained.

    Thanks again!


    Yes but I don't think that there could be that well trained of a person on every single flight.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #7
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    Yes but I don't think that there could be that well trained of a person on every single flight.


    Same here. Well I am glad that airlines haven't been showing an interest in this and I have to wonder who is actually buying this product from Lamperd.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #8
    I don't like the idea but I don't fly because I think rude passengers are too much to deal with.

    When forced to spread my (dirty minded harlets) wings, I usually purchase a few bottles of the wine so I relax and don't get annoyed by....

    excuse me but I've been waiting for 30 minutes on my 1/2 selter water 1/4 tonic water 1/4 evian over 2 cubes of ice with a splash of oj! dude we've been in the air 15 minute!

    I cannot stand how passengers treat staff so I drive.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #9
    @ Susan Duclos
    Same here. Well I am glad that airlines haven't been showing an interest in this and I have to wonder who is actually buying this product from Lamperd.


    Do we really want to know? This, IMO, is way over the top. For all of this, I'd quit flying and either drive or take a ship!
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #10
    I don't like the idea but I don't fly because I think rude passengers are too much to deal with.

    When forced to spread my (dirty minded harlets) wings, I usually purchase a few bottles of the wine so I relax and don't get annoyed by....

    excuse me but I've been waiting for 30 minutes on my 1/2 selter water 1/4 tonic water 1/4 evian over 2 cubes of ice with a splash of oj! dude we've been in the air 15 minute!

    I cannot stand how passengers treat staff so I drive.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #11
    YUP

    One more reason for me to keep on driving everywhere I go.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #12
    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    I don't like the idea but I don't fly because I think rude passengers are too much to deal with.

    When forced to spread my (dirty minded harlets) wings, I usually purchase a few bottles of the wine so I relax and don't get annoyed by....

    excuse me but I've been waiting for 30 minutes on my 1/2 selter water 1/4 tonic water 1/4 evian over 2 cubes of ice with a splash of oj! dude we've been in the air 15 minute!

    I cannot stand how passengers treat staff so I drive.


    Flying is a bitch these days, but I prefer more security in the airport before getting on the flight.



    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Do we really want to know? This, IMO, is way over the top. For all of this, I'd quit flying and either drive or take a ship!


    I thought it sort of crossed a line as well. Too much could go wrong, or be handled wrong y the wrong people.




    @ Mr Garibaldi
    YUP

    One more reason for me to keep on driving everywhere I go.


    I doubt any airline is going to take on the controversy of implementing these things.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #13
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    YUP

    One more reason for me to keep on driving everywhere I go.


    Oh I take it then that you got your car fixed. :-)
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #14
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    Oh I take it then that you got your car fixed. :-)


    Oh hell yeah!!!
    Dumar USA
    Cinderella Car
    image:39234:0::0


    Mike's Car that he threatened Picasso a ride on!! (winks at Picasso)
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #15
    ..
    \O/

    YOU FIXED IT!!
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #16
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    ..
    \O/

    YOU FIXED IT!!


    Yup, but now you have to see if Picasso will take that ride with you. Better have something good to offer her after last time.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #17
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    ..
    \O/

    YOU FIXED IT!!



    Whoopee!!
    Mike when are you going to take me for a ride in it?
    Of course you get to drive as I will just sit there while you provide the power. LOL
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #18
    YABBA DABBA DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #19
    Oh lord he is in Flintstone mode.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #20
    DINO! DADDY'S HOME!!!
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #21
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    YABBA DABBA DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!


    @ Susan Duclos
    Oh lord he is in Flintstone mode.


    Is he dangerous when he is like this Susan. Do you think I should turn my computer off and go read a book?
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #22
    I'm quiet when I'm dangerous, darlin...lol.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #23
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    I'm quiet when I'm dangerous, darlin...lol.


    Uh oh one of those that get very quiet before an attack?
    Well just keep yelling then. :-)
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #24
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    Is he dangerous when he is like this Susan. Do you think I should turn my computer off and go read a book?


    No, it is popcorn time when he gets like this...LOLOL

    Better than a good movie!
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #25
    OOHHHH YEAHHH, let the MADNESS wash over you and run WILD!!!


    DIG IT!
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #26
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    OOHHHH YEAHHH, let the MADNESS wash over you and run WILD!!!


    DIG IT!


    (takes Mike's corona away and replaces it with coffee)
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #27
    @ Susan Duclos
    (takes Mike's corona away and replaces it with coffee)


    Maybe Mike had better go read a book and lay off the corona. :-)
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #28
    @ Susan Duclos
    (takes Mike's corona away and replaces it with coffee)


    (laces the coffee with Jack Daniels while Susan isn't looking)
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #29
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    Maybe Mike had better go read a book and lay off the corona. :-)


    LOL. For someone that isn't much of a drinker, when he decides to have a couple , he handles it well and gets all funny.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #30
    Not as funny as when I do...other things...and start singing...

    AHEM.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #31
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    Not as funny as when I do...other things...and start singing...

    AHEM.


    Ya mean like Little Bunny Foo Foo?
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #32
    EXACTLY
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #33
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    Not as funny as when I do...other things...and start singing...

    AHEM.


    @ Mr Garibaldi
    EXACTLY


    OK here is your song, Mike

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjSnlvGHOWA
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #34
    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #35
    {munching popcorn}
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #36
    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    {munching popcorn}



  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #37
    LOL-that's me! and ya'll are the entertainment.

    I hope you enjoy your ride, although the foreign engineering of mikes ride looks a bit unstable to me.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #38
    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    LOL-that's me! and ya'll are the entertainment.

    I hope you enjoy your ride, although the foreign engineering of mikes ride looks a bit unstable to me.


    You are talking about the car, right?
  • avatar Posted Apr 20, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #39
    If they really wish to pursue this ridiculous notion, my idea is more effective and will save the airlines billions of dollars.

    Why not just handcuff and chain all passengers to their seats?

    Ridiculous? You bet!

    But, is it any different?
  • avatar Posted Apr 20, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #40
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    You are talking about the car, right?


    Now that was funny!





    @ LewWaters
    If they really wish to pursue this ridiculous notion, my idea is more effective and will save the airlines billions of dollars.

    Why not just handcuff and chain all passengers to their seats?

    Ridiculous? You bet!

    Thanks Lew, I wasn't exactly happy with this idea myself.

    So, if the Gov won't use them, the airlines won't use them, who is going to buy these and for what purpose.



    But, is it any different?

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?