The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageEncyclopedia Britannica Free for Bloggers, Not Free for Public

Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull) in Internet | 11 comments | 233 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
Encyclopedia Britannica unveiled a new program which allows bloggers to browse their site free. Bloggers can post Britannica articles in their sites in the form of widgets.
Encyclopedia Britannica (EB) has taken a severe beating ever since Wikipedia came into business online. According to Comscore, for every page that is viewed on Brittanica.com, nearly 184 pages are viewed on Wikipedia (3.8 billion page views per month vs. 21 million page views per month for Britannica).

Now EB wants to change that trend. Previously, EB was available for limited view only but allowed others to access the content for $70 per year and sold its 32 volume encyclopedia, which has 65,000 articles and 44 million words for $1,400. But EB will now provide the online content free for bloggers.

EB calls this new program Britannica Webshare and will make them available for bloggers provided that they are a “web publisher”. EB defines “web publisher” as follows:

This program is intended for people who publish with some regularity on the Internet, be they bloggers, webmasters, or writers. We reserve the right to deny participation to anyone who in our judgment doesn’t qualify.”

If you are a regular blogger, you can sign up, submit your URL and a description. EB reviews the application and will decide whether to let you access the site for free.

Once you are chosen, you can access the full versions of article and you can post that link in your site. Your readers can read the full article but they can’t access other parts of the site. You can also embed articles as shown in this one.

Britannica uses nearly 4,000 contributors to write the encyclopedia articles.

TechCrunch said this effort is “half pregnant,” instead of making it free for everyone. It is free for some not free for the public. With this effort, EB might be trying to get more search share, and get money from the subscription model and the 32 volume book set.

Michael Arrington from TechCrunch thinks that eventually EB will become free and separate itself from Wikipedia with expert contributors similar to Citizendium, created by Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger in 2006.
article:253467:7::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Nickolove Lovemore
    #1
    Very interesting. I regularly use Wikipedia. I'll now give Britannica a try as well.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #2
    @ Nickolove Lovemore
    Very interesting. I regularly use Wikipedia. I'll now give Britannica a try as well.
    Let us know your feedback later. Thanks.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #3
    This looks interesting, I'll check it out, thanks.
  • Jonathan Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Jonathan
    #4
    I feel like EB is trying to take a large step out there to try to dominate the industry, if you look at it from an outside perspective ( in my opinion ) this isn't really much of a step at all. Wikipedia is popular because of its free open source based information. EB gives you the facts and not up to date stuff like when movies are coming out and information about things that EB just wouldn't have. The open source nature of Wikipedia and the fact that you can find out other things not just facts and articles. This could be useful to those who use Wikipedia for reports ( or news articles ) but the fact its only free to active bloggers doesn't give the world free access and in the long run probably won't increase there readers.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #5
    Excellent news!!!
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #6
    @ Jonathan
    I feel like EB is trying to take a large step out there to try to dominate the industry, if you look at it from an outside perspective ( in my opinion ) this isn't really much of a step at all. Wikipedia is popular because of its free open source based information. EB gives you the facts and not up to date stuff like when movies are coming out and information about things that EB just wouldn't have. The open source nature of Wikipedia and the fact that you can find out other things not just facts and articles. This could be useful to those who use Wikipedia for reports ( or news articles ) but the fact its only free to active bloggers doesn't give the world free access and in the long run probably won't increase there readers.
    I think they are trying to get a piece of Wikipedia's share in Google search results. Whenever we search a term, Google usually points to the Wikipedia article as the first link. It will help EB a little but they should open it for everyone, maybe they can have some ads to monetize their work.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #7
    @ Bob Ewing
    This looks interesting, I'll check it out, thanks.
    Let us know how it works. Thanks.

    @ Susan Duclos
    Excellent news!!!
    Thanks Susan.
  • avatar Posted Apr 21, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #8
    I received an invite from Britannica. It is easy to apply, just takes a minute or two. Click the link in the article if you are interested.
  • avatar Posted Apr 21, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #9
    @ Chris V. (cgull)
    I received an invite from Britannica. It is easy to apply, just takes a minute or two. Click the link in the article if you are interested.


    I applied the day you wrote it. I love having a whole new avenue of references and information. I cannot thank you enough for bringing this out.
  • avatar Posted Apr 21, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #10
    @ Susan Duclos
    I applied the day you wrote it. I love having a whole new avenue of references and information. I cannot thank you enough for bringing this out.
    Thanks Susan, glad you received it also. Cheers :)
  • avatar Posted May 18, 2008 by  Sheba
    #11
    Thanks for pointing me to this C. I'm going to give them a try too.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?