The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageNew Study Shows Dangerous Chemicals In Cats and Dogs From Household Chemicals

Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Sue D. in Health | 13 comments | 1793 views
Advertising
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) produced a study that was released by Berkeley-East Bay Humane Society yesterday which shows that high levels of toxic chemicals are found in dogs and cats.
These chemicals are affecting the health of these animals and they come from a variety of sources, from plastics, food packaging chemicals, heavy metals, fire retardants, and stain-proofing chemicals, all of which the report states could also affect the health of children as well.

Pets face chemical exposures that in some ways are similar to those of infants and toddlers, who have limited diets and play close to the floor and put their hands and household objects in their mouths far more often than adults. For pets as for children, exposures are greater and the resulting health risks are higher.


Testing for industrial chemicals in the blood and urine of 20 dogs and 37 cats from the Virginia veterinary clinic, found 48 out of 70 chemicals that were tested for.

For almost all the chemicals included in this study, health risks in pets have not been studied. The chemicals could point to an increase in cancer and hyperthyroidism in cats and dogs.

Some of the conclusions found show that simple everyday products we use, or track into our houses, could be responsible. For example, cats lick their paws and end up with dust that studies show can be contaminated with the neurotoxic fire retardants. Dogs eat scraps off the floor which dirt and dust tracked in from the outdoors and contaminated with heavy metals and pesticides, even flea collars bought to protect animals from flea infestation spews "droplets of insecticide that can be lethal to cats", dog food package, chew toys, and even foam beds might be infused or coated with fire retardants and stain-proofing chemicals linked to cancer and birth defects, and plastic water bowls might leach hormone disruptors.

In what is being called the most comprehensive investigation of the chemical body burden of companion animals conducted to date, this study has found 23 chemicals being reported in pets for the first time.

For dogs, blood and urine samples were contaminated with 35 chemicals altogether, including 11 carcinogens, 31 chemicals toxic to the reproductive system, and 24 neurotoxins.


Dog Pie Chart
35 chemicals detected - 40% at higher levels in dogs than people
Environmental Working Group (Creative Commons - Attribution)


The particular worry there are the carcinogens, because dogs suffer from a much higher rate of cancer than humans do, including 35 times more skin cancer, 4 times more breast tumors, 8 times more bone cancer, and twice the incidence of leukemia, according to the Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Center in 2008.

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in dogs. 20 to 25 percent of dogs die of cancer.

Cat samples contained 46 chemicals altogether, including 9 carcinogens, 40 chemicals toxic to the reproductive system, 34 neurotoxins, and 15 chemicals toxic to the endocrine system.


Cat Pie Chart
46 chemicals detected - 96% at higher levels in cats than people
Environmental Working Group (Creative Commons - Attribution)


The particular concern there is the Endocrine (hormone) system toxins, because they include the thyroid toxins and fire retardants called PBDEs.

The leading cause of illness in older cats is Thyroid disease (hyperthyroidism).

According to Bill Walker, vice president of the group's West Coast operations, "We need a better system of regulating toxic chemicals in this country. We need to test the chemicals before they are allowed on the market. Our animals are trying to tell us something here."

It is believed the rise in health issues of the animals, directly related to the toxic chemicals found in their system may be a reflection of levels in humans.

One person that believes this is Arlene Blum who is a chemist and visiting scholar at UC Berkeley who works with members of the group for chemical regulation reform, says, "It's the same chemicals being exposed to our bodies, our cats' bodies, our kids' bodies."


The study concludes:

The body burden testing conducted in this investigation is the most expansive ever published for companion animals. The study indicates that cats and dogs are exposed to complex mixtures of industrial chemicals, often at levels far in excess of those found in people. Our pets well may be serving as sentinels for our own health, as they breathe in, ingest or absorb the same chemicals that are in our environments. Exposures that pose risks for pets pose risks for human health as well. A new system of public health protections that required companies to prove chemicals are safe before they are sold would help protect all of us, including the pets we love.


As this report points out, in America there are 8 times more companion dogs and cats than there are children under five. Seventy percent more households have dogs or cats than children of any age.

As Blum asserts, "We need to test chemicals before they enter the environment. And companies have no incentive to do that."

Perhaps it is time someone gives them that incentive.
article:253439:16::0

3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #1
    Customer education and a demand for better products. Gods please don't anyone suggest governmental regulations; all that would do is make it worse.
  • Sue D. Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #2
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    Customer education and a demand for better products. Gods please don't anyone suggest governmental regulations; all that would do is make it worse.


    I really don't have any suggestions except to look at the chemicals in the animals and try to not buy products with them.

    I think it is more of a consumer/producer thing, we can force them to test the chemicals in their products.

    Gotta start cooking, brb
  • avatar Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #3
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    Customer education and a demand for better products. Gods please don't anyone suggest governmental regulations; all that would do is make it worse.


    Hey mike, maybe we should have governmental regulation on all products that come into contact with everything? OH WAIT - conspiracy theory, sorry.
  • avatar Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #4
    @ Sue D.
    I really don't have any suggestions except to look at the chemicals in the animals and try to not buy products with them.

    I think it is more of a consumer/producer thing, we can force them to test the chemicals in their products.

    Gotta start cooking, brb


    I'm cheap when it comes to my 260 lb dog. LOL. He gets the old comforters and well, his special toys are so darned expensive (at $50 and $60 each) that I cannot imagine they have and if they do, I'm screwed.

    He is such a pansy anyway.......I won't even let him lick his paws much less his you know what so he just kind of lays around and looks at me and waits to "go".

    This is really not good though - great story susy q.....bad information for pet owners, especially the little ones.
  • Sue D. Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #5
    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    Hey mike, maybe we should have governmental regulation on all products that come into contact with everything? OH WAIT - conspiracy theory, sorry.


    Tin Foil Hat
    Tin Foil Hats are for conspiracy theorists
    by jspaw (Creative Commons - Attribution)


    Thats for your conspiracy theory!!! LOLOL
  • Sue D. Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #6
    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    I'm cheap when it comes to my 260 lb dog. LOL. He gets the old comforters and well, his special toys are so darned expensive (at $50 and $60 each) that I cannot imagine they have and if they do, I'm screwed.

    He is such a pansy anyway.......I won't even let him lick his paws much less his you know what so he just kind of lays around and looks at me and waits to "go".

    This is really not good though - great story susy q.....bad information for pet owners, especially the little ones.


    Thanks hon
  • avatar Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #7
    WHEW that's bigger than my 150 lb lab...LOL

    I dunno bout the whole tinfoil hat thing...makes you like kinda like a hershey's kiss...
  • Sue D. Posted Apr 18, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #8
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    WHEW that's bigger than my 150 lb lab...LOL

    I dunno bout the whole tinfoil hat thing...makes you like kinda like a hershey's kiss...


    KB has a sense of humor, I knew she would laugh
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Catfan81
    #9
    Good work on this story.
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #10
    This isn't good news, even though it makes too much sense. And if we are poisoning our pets inadvertently, then what are we doing to our children?
  • avatar Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #11
    This is some very bad news.
    I was over at Jaguar's/Laura house yesterday and she has three cats plus two parrots.

    When I took the napkin ring off the napkin it slid and fell on the floor. She laughed and said "Cat toy" so I immediately picked it up.

    A wrapped mint fell out of my husband's pocket and I told him that it was on the floor and to pick it up as I saw one of the cats heading for it. Laura laughed again and said "Cat toy"

    Everything that is on the floor or falls on the floor the cats check it out.

    I emailed this to Laura as it is something that she needs to be aware of.
  • Sue D. Posted Apr 19, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #12
    @ Catfan81
    Good work on this story.


    Thank you.


    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    This isn't good news, even though it makes too much sense. And if we are poisoning our pets inadvertently, then what are we doing to our children?


    That is why when i saw there not many stories written about this yet, I wrote it. That is a very real problem if the animals are indicative.

    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    This is some very bad news.
    I was over at Jaguar's/Laura house yesterday and she has three cats plus two parrots.

    When I took the napkin ring off the napkin it slid and fell on the floor. She laughed and said "Cat toy" so I immediately picked it up.

    A wrapped mint fell out of my husband's pocket and I told him that it was on the floor and to pick it up as I saw one of the cats heading for it. Laura laughed again and said "Cat toy"

    Everything that is on the floor or falls on the floor the cats check it out.

    I emailed this to Laura as it is something that she needs to be aware of.


    I started going through the dozens of my dog toys as well, the problem is I don't know what to look for to take away.
  • hamishdad Posted Apr 24, 2008 by  hamishdad
    #13
    I believe that flea and tick control products are a main source of dangerous chemicals (including neurotoxins) in cats and dogs and children who play with animals that were treated with these poisons. I hope that the EWG will someday do a study on this problem.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty