The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

Op-Ed: McCain Benefits from Democrat's Soap Opera?

Posted Mar 25, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi in Politics | 6 comments | 327 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
As the ongoing warfare between Clinton and Obama continues, John McCain has a chance to regroup and prepare his campaign strategy for the coming November general elections. What can he do to remain in the public's mind from now until then?
The slug-fest between Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama continues. Currently, Obama leads in the popular vote and has secured the support of several states, while Clinton has secured several larger states and possibly holds sway over a number of super-delegates for the upcoming Denver convention in August. And the mud is slinging and flying. From Obama's controversial religious ties and affiliations to Clinton's embellishments on her role in international affairs as First Lady, including a very embarrassing version by her of events on her trip to Bosnia, neither candidate is doing themselves any favors as the primary season begins winding down to a close. At this point, both of them are covered with mud, and they're largely not slinging it each other, but winding up falling, face first, into the puddle and muddying themselves.

There is little doubt that either candidate can garner enough support at the polls to become the clear-cut leader going into the convention. Neither candidate seems willing, at this point, to concede to the other and bow out. This leaves the playing field wide open for voters in the remaining primaries and caucuses, and a convention seeing the entry of not one clear choice for the party, but two equally determined individuals to choose from.

Democrats have never been known for Spock-like rationality, but even they see the logic of avoiding a convention fiasco. "It's in nobody's interest in the Democratic Party for that to happen," says Mike Feldman, another former Gore aide. "There is a mechanism in place--built into the process--to avoid that." That mechanism, such as it is, involves an en masse movement of uncommitted superdelegates to the perceived winner of the primaries. Almost everything you hear from such people suggests this will happen in time. "I think once we have the elected delegate count, things will move fairly quickly, " says Representative Chris Van Hollen, who oversees the party's House campaign committee. Increasingly, there is even agreement on the metric by which a winner would be named. Just about every superdelegate and party operative I spoke with endorsed Nancy Pelosi's recent suggestion that pledged delegates should matter most.


We've all seen exactly how wonderfully Nancy Pelosi can run things by now, haven't we?

With so much focus on the fighting amongst the Democrats, what is going on with the Republican side of the campaign? John McCain is taking a little time to regroup and form his strategy for entry into the general election segment, and Rush Limbaugh has implemented what he calls "Operation Chaos," his plan to keep the "soap opera" of the Democratic primaries race going on through the August convention in Denver.

Folks, we are doing it! Do you realize, we are doing it! Things are happening out there on our terms. Why, this is just fabulous. "McCain leads 46 percent to 40 percent in a hypothetical matchup against Obama in the November presidential election, according to the poll.


McCain's campaign manager has stated that the focus for the next phase will be on McCain's positive aspects, his service records both in the navy and in government, and to make the public more aware of who McCain is as an individual. One of the hurdles McCain faces will be in how to best spend his campaign money; McCain is historically not a candidate who has been successful in raising huge amounts of campaign funds. Reestablishing the campaign infrastructure is another priority for the McCain camp, having to rebuild it since it's 2007 collapse due to lack of funding.

McCain is gaining ground in the polls, however, in large part due to the infighting of the Democratic party, and several polls show him leading either top Democrat in the race for the White House in November.

Mr. McCain commands considerable support among independents, especially against Mrs. Clinton, of New York. This suggests that should she win the Democratic nomination, he would have an easier time winning states like New Hampshire and Colorado. Against Mr. Obama, Mr. McCain fares worse among independents but slightly better among Democrats. That signals opportunity in states filled with lunch-bucket Democrats, like Michigan and Ohio.

Long before the Democratic race ends, Mr. Fabrizio said, Mr. McCain must “war game” a strategy and a message for either outcome.


This is probably the main problem facing the McCain camp, for the moment. With no clear cut leader on the Democratic side, McCain can really do little more than await the emergence of the Democrats nominee and ultimate candidate that he will face for the November ballot. Until the August conventions, all any of us can really do is await the outcome of "Operation Chaos."
article:252124:11::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Mar 25, 2008 by  Chris Hogg
    #1
    Great Op-Ed Mike, but I've got a counterpoint to consider: The fighting doesn't make anyone look good, but do you think the Obama-Clinton duel is actually putting the Democrats in front of more voters? I'm sure the political coverage is different in the U.S. but what I'm seeing in Canada now is 80 per cent of TV time devoted to Clinton/Obama and very little given to McCain. That's an awful lot of people who will constantly hear about the Dems and how they want to change things. What do you think?
  • avatar Posted Mar 25, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #2
    @ Chris Hogg
    Great Op-Ed Mike, but I've got a counterpoint to consider: The fighting doesn't make anyone look good, but do you think the Obama-Clinton duel is actually putting the Democrats in front of more voters? I'm sure the political coverage is different in the U.S. but what I'm seeing in Canada now is 80 per cent of TV time devoted to Clinton/Obama and very little given to McCain. That's an awful lot of people who will constantly hear about the Dems and how they want to change things. What do you think?


    Since he doesn't seem to be around, let me attempt to answer that for now.

    If you go to the Democratic blogs, you see that the old adage of attention is good whether it is good attention or bad, doesn't seem to be going over to well.

    The recent polls which I have been showing the trends of are reporting that the negativity, the lies, the constant controversy are seriously turning off the Independents and Moderates as well.

    In this case, people here aren't hearing about "change" from the two candidates, all we are inundated with is Hillary's "Misstatement" aka lie, which she says should be considered a "blip", we are seeing Obama's pastor side by side with Obama excusing him, we are seeing "worried Dems wish for a dream team", and we see extreme hypocrisy when Obama slams McCain for the 100 year remark, completely ignoring that his own military adviser, General Tony Mcpeak told the Oregonian in 2003, "Who wants to volunteer to get cross-ways with us? We’ll be there a century, hopefully. If it works right." (speaking of Iraq)

    So, I venture a guess that the reason the latest daily and weekly polls are showing McCain leading, gaining and having much higher favorable ratings as well as much lower unfavorable ratings, is because bad attention highlighting lack of experience, hypocrisy and lies, is not the kind of attention that helps.
  • avatar Posted Mar 25, 2008 by  Helena Handbasket
    #3
    Great op-ed Mr. Tippitt. Thank you.
  • avatar Posted Mar 25, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #4
    Right now McCain IS getting less air time than either Clinton or Obama. It's one of the things that he's going to have to deal with in the months between now and August when the DNC has their convention; keeping his name out there, and his message. Not an easy thing when the sniping back and forth between the Democrats is making such breaking news almost daily.

    We know next to nothing about Obama, as he's fairly new to national politics. Clinton, well just say the name and you can expect a reaction, either good or bad. The bickering and going for each others jugulars is making both Democratic candidates come across like a pair of feuding skunks rather than as viable candidates, they're more like a couple of children arguing on a grade school playground than anything that could be considered a serious national and international leader at this point, in my opinion.
  • avatar Posted Mar 27, 2008 by  Helena Handbasket
    #5
    @ Jedediah Redman
    Again I'd like to thank you brownshirts from the swarm for your concern about the well-being of the Democrats. Democrats are and always have been difficult to keep in the same pen. They are contrary critters.
    Orthodoxy seems to rest more comfortably on Republicans.
    I continue to say a pox on both of your houses...


    .... and a pox on your host symbiont bobblehead for he that hath the need for penis-propping bobbleheads will surely be cursed for all eternity.
  • avatar Posted Mar 27, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #6
    Reported the brownshirt remarks again. Some people never learn.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?