| Entertainment Post News ($)     Upload Images»
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» Help Center» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»

article imageDavid Brooks of NYT studies highly successful social misanthropes’ 'Rank Links'

Published Mar 16, 2008, by Paul Wallis
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Listen
Email Print
Subscribe to author
Save as mp3 | Speech-enabled by ReadSpeaker
Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

David Brooks of NYT studies highly successful social misanthropes’ 'Rank Links'

by Paul Wallis.
Brooks is a NYT op-ed guy I really like reading, because his depth of concept is very strong. In this case he’s hit a good major chord, a think piece on the study of the relationship between success and being an almost total failure as a human being.
There’s something very apt about a New York Times op-ed columnist writing on this subject. The Big Awful side of the Big Apple produces bizarre successful characters like no other city in the world.

Brooks’ approach to the idea is the development and denouement of these highly successful misfits, and if there’s a person living who doesn’t know what he’s talking about, I’ll be very surprised.

I’m only going to do one quote from his NYT piece, because it really must be read in its entirety, but this is the scene setter for the evolution of the subjects:

They go through the oboe practice, soccer camp, homework marathon childhood. Their parent-teacher conferences are like mini-Hall of Fame enshrinements as all gather to worship at the flame of their incipient success. In high school, they enter their Alpha Geekdom. They rack up great grades and develop that coating of arrogance that forms on those who know that in the long run they will be more successful than the beauties and jocks who get dates.

Things then get much worse.

Dr. Jekyll was a model of consistency, compared to these Irish stews of social elements and expectations, and Hyde was a finishing school instructor.

It’s always fascinated me that the sheer mindlessness of their lives hasn’t occurred to some of the people he’s talking about. The “Achiever Ethos” seems to destroy humanity, and maybe even personal individuality, in some. I’ve met highly successful “people” who really couldn’t qualify for the description any way but biologically, and even that’s sometimes debatable.

"Missing Links" would be another description.

These guys are the Ultimate Social Product, taken to a logical conclusion.

There’s a Great American Novel, or several, in this article, and a few black comedies.

Actually, Brooks being a New Yorker, maybe this article should go to Broadway, instead.

I nearly put this article in “Environment”…
article:251714:7::0

Comments »

Share on
del.icio.us digg facebook newsvine reddit stumbleupon technorati
Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?