The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post Blog»     Post News ($)»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Live Events»     Alerts»     User Benefits»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageTwo-Thirds of Americans Believe Traditional Journalism is 'Out of Touch'

Posted Feb 29, 2008 by  Chris Hogg in Business | 8 comments | 2272 views
Advertising
According to a new poll, more than two-thirds of the U.S. believe traditional journalism is out of touch with what Americans want from their news. The survey also showed more people are turning to the Web to get their daily news fix.

Digital Journal – America is the land of the free and the home of the journalistically dissatisfied. According to a We Media/Zogby interactive poll, 67 per cent of Americans believe traditional journalism is out of touch with what Americans care about.

While most Americans (70 per cent) believe journalism is important to the quality of life in their communities, 64 per cent are dissatisfied with the quality of journalism they receive.

The survey found that the Internet outweighs TV, radio and newspapers as the most frequently used and important source for news and information. Websites were also cited as being more trustworthy than traditional sources by 32 per cent of respondents.

“For the second year in a row we have documented a crisis in American journalism that is far more serious than the industry’s business challenges – or maybe a consequence of them,” said Andrew Nachison, co-founder of iFOCOS, in a news release." “Americans recognize the value of journalism for their communities, and they are unsatisfied with what they see. While the U.S. news industry sheds expenses and frets about its future, Americans are dismayed by its present."

The survey also showed more people moving away from traditional news sources like TV and radio, searching online for information instead. The We Media/Zogby Interactive poll shows this trend happening most with "digital natives," or people under 30.

What may come as a surprise to many is almost half of the survey's respondents said their primary source of news comes from the Internet. That is up 40 per cent over numbers this time last year.

"We see clearly the generational shift of digital natives from traditional to online news – so the challenge for traditional news companies is complex," said Nachison. "They need to invest in new products and services – and they have. But they’ve also got to invest in quality, influence and impact. They need to invest in journalism that makes a difference in people’s lives. That’s a moral and leadership challenge – and a business opportunity for whoever can meet it.”

More than half (55 per cent) of younger adults (18 to 29 years old) turn to the Web for news, compared to 35 per cent of people 65 and older. Adults aged 65 and older are the only age group who prefer a source other than the Internet as their primary source for news.

The Web is largely being regarded as an important source for today's news, as 86 per cent of Americans said it's an important source of news, while 56 per cent of respondents said it was very important. Only 38 per cent of respondents said they consider blogs to be an important source of news.

The survey was conducted across the U.S. from Feb. 20 to 21, contacting 1,979 adults. It carries a margin of error of +/- 2.2 percentage points

Other findings from the survey:
- Although the vast majority of Americans are dissatisfied with the quality of journalism (64 per cent), overall satisfaction with journalism has increased to 35 per cent in this survey from 27 per cent who said the same in 2007.

- Both traditional and new media are viewed as important for the future of journalism – 87 per cent believe professional journalism has a vital role to play in journalism’s future, although citizen journalism (77 per cent) and blogging (59 per cent) are also seen as significant by most Americans.

- Very few Americans (1 per cent) consider blogs their most trusted source of news, or their primary source of news (1 per cent).

- Three in four (75 per cent) respondents believe the Internet has had a positive impact on the overall quality of journalism.

- 69 per cent believe media companies are becoming too large and powerful to allow for competition, while 17 per cent believe they are the right size to adequately compete.

- Republicans (79 per cent) and political independents (75 per cent) are most likely to feel disenchanted with conventional journalism, but the online survey found 50 per cent of Democrats also expressed similar concerns. Those who identify themselves as “very conservative” were among the most dissatisfied -- 89 per cent of that demographic viewed traditional journalism as out of touch.

7 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • S. D. Posted Feb 29, 2008 by  S. D.
    #1
    No big surprise here at those numbers. Online you c an get links, search for verification and manage to get any and all news that you need to be informed.

    The media has taken the role of "opinion makers", not news reporters.

    Good find Chris.
  • avatar Posted Feb 29, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #2
    more people are turning to the Web to get their daily news fix.


    You betcha! And most of it comes from here!!!

    Why? Because I know that the CJs here have integrity enough to give us the best information that they can.
  • Hargrove Posted Feb 29, 2008 by  Hargrove
    #3
    Susan Duclos: "The media has taken the role of 'opinion' makers", not news reporters."

    Ditto!
  • avatar Posted Feb 29, 2008 by  Paul Wallis (Wanderlaugh)
    #4
    Self inflicted injury. Mainstream is now suffering from marketers trying to be editors, and vice versa. It has no credibility, by definition.

    These current generations are the most educated human beings who have ever lived. They've all had exposure to much better quality information, and know where to find it when they want it.

    Mainstream journalists are "employees". Serfs with bylines. Even a really good mainstream journalist has to deal with the idiosyncrasies of hierarchy as an inferior. Anything can be added or removed up the food chain. News is killed or maimed by a set of priorities which has nothing to do with what the public want to know or need to know.

    It's the wrong relationship for anyone trying to write anything. Facts have their own protocols.

    Mainstream is getting the rejection it deserves, and needs, to evolve.

    News media now is much more wide ranging than it used to be. That was a result of public demand. Whether they like it or not, the real market will ultimately call the shots.
  • avatar Posted Feb 29, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #5
    When I read a newspaper or watch a news program, I desire to see what has happened or is going on, not to be told what I should think about it.

    Susan Duclos: "The media has taken the role of 'opinion' makers", not news reporters."

    How true! Nowhere better can we see it than in our Primary process this year!
  • avatar Posted Mar 1, 2008 by  Competetant414
    #6
    You're right on the mark! In my mind, newspapers are an advertising media with not much relevance. However, papers do bring a lot of diverse topics together in one place, and can serve a purpose where using internet acccess is not always possible, such as in a Hospital waiting area.
    Television news is another story altogether, often filled with sensationalistic journalism. I regret the pain and trauma many people experience, but I am not interested in watching articles about crime, shootings and other depressing topics. I am sorry, but I don't want to hear these things particularly when they focus on other geographical areas. I know, I know, one has to be informed about events happening around the world, but that's a different story; give me relevance.
    At least printed and televised media may make you aware of news topics so you can search further.
  • rasa Posted Mar 17, 2008 by  rasa
    #7
    My question is, "Where does reality and the heart of journalism come together in co-creating a new perspective of journalism and the new earth?"
  • avatar Posted Mar 22, 2008 by  pajamadeen
    #8
    Websites were also cited as being more trustworthy than traditional sources by 32 per cent of respondents.


    That part surprises me. Just because someone knows how to code doesn't inherently make them more trustworthy.

    I think that some of the mainstream media - such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, CTV, CBC and so forth - have adapted readily to the online format. I find them to be credible and much more current, due to the medium, than traditional print media can ever hope to be, chained as they are to print. (Small example: It is frustrating to try to discuss with my mother a breaking news story in the middle of the afternoon. If it wasn't in The Washington Postwhen she picked it up on her porch that morning, she doesn't have a clue what I'm talking about. The story will not exist for her, until she picks up the next day's paper and reads it there.)

    But I'm still puzzled as to why online media would be considered inherently more "trustworthy," though. Many an online writer has an agenda. Bloggers and citizen journalists, in particular, spring to mind. The traditional media, such as those I mentioned above, which have successfully made the online transition, have excellent coverage, though. The online journalism has also given birth to some excellent coverage - Mother Jones and Alternet, to name but two. The thing I find most refreshing about online journalism is the diversity of opinions and the greater selection of written materials.

Add a Comment

emptyAdd a Comment or Login/Register empty