The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

Study Says Snowflakes Carry Bacteria

Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  Bob Ewing in Environment | 8 comments | 441 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
1 more article on this subject:
Snowflakes may be pretty but they are also likely to be carrying bacteria which can be harmful to plants such as tomatoes and beans ; however, without them it may not rain or snow.
A new study that was supported by a Louisiana State University research grant informs us that snowflakes could be transporting bacteria. The majority of snowflakes, as well as rain, are formed in chilly conditions high in the sky.

The Discovery News report says that the moisture needs something to cling to in order to condense. The study conducted by Brent C. Christner, an assistant professor of biological sciences at Louisiana State University and others shows that, a surprisingly large share of those so-called nucleators turn out to be bacteria that can affect plants.

"Bacteria are by far the most active ice nuclei in nature," said Brent C. Christner

The research team sampled snow from Antarctica, France, Montana and the Yukon.

The bacteria were most common in France, followed by Montana and the Yukon, and were even present to a lesser degree in Antarctica.

Pseudomonas syringae was the most common bacteria found and it can cause disease in several types of plants including tomatoes and beans.

Pseudomonas syringae was found in 20 samples of snow from around the world and subsequent research has also found it in summer rainfall in Louisiana.

Prior to this study the reaction to Pseudomonas was to try and eliminate it; this new information calls that tactic into question.
"The question is, are they a good guy or a bad guy," Christner said, "and I don't have the answer to that."

It is now apparent that Pseudomonas is effective at getting moisture in a cloud to condense.

The question that now stands out is whether planting crops known to be infected by Pseudomonas in areas experiencing drought might help increase precipitation there by adding more nuclei to the atmosphere.

It was already understood that microbes and insects and algae blow around in the atmosphere, Christner said "but the atmosphere has not been recognized as a place where things are active. That has been changing in the last decade. In a cloud you've got water, organic carbon," everything necessary to support a microorganism.

Virginia K. Walker is a biologist at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and she said that other researchers have found bacteria serving as snow nuclei, but had not identified it as Pseudomonas.

"It's one of those great bacteria ... you can find them anywhere," said Walker, who was not part of the research team. "They are really interesting."

Charles Knight is a cloud physics expert at the National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colo. Knight was not surprised by the finding, however.

At relatively warm temperatures of just a few degrees below freezing, bacteria are "remarkably effective" at attracting ice formation, said Knight, who also was not part of the research group.
article:250943:8::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #1
    I knew about the probability of pollution contaminates in snow flakes, but not bacteria. Guess that means no more sticking our tongues out to catch that flake passing by, huh? LOL!
  • avatar Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #2
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    I knew about the probability of pollution contaminates in snow flakes, but not bacteria. Guess that means no more sticking our tongues out to catch that flake passing by, huh? LOL!

    I'd pass on that activity. :-)
  • avatar Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #3
    So does this mean little kids playing in the snow, building snowmen and making snowballs which they occasionally lick are being exposed to massive amounts of bacteria?

    How sad is that?!
  • avatar Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #4
    @ Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    So does this mean little kids playing in the snow, building snowmen and making snowballs which they occasionally lick are being exposed to massive amounts of bacteria?

    How sad is that?!


    Scary...that's for sure.
  • avatar Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #5
    It is something to consider, if playing in snow is dangerous, then some of us are in deep trouble. add the harm to two very popular foods, beans and tomatoes and the troubles get deeper.
  • Samantha A. Torrence Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #6
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Scary...that's for sure.


    Scary? Nah, it'll just build up the good ole Immune system. I used to eat Icicles that formed on my roof and I am just fine *twitch twitch*
  • avatar Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #7
    @ Samantha A. Torrence
    Scary? Nah, it'll just build up the good ole Immune system. I used to eat Icicles that formed on my roof and I am just fine *twitch twitch*

    nice twitch. :-)
  • avatar Posted Feb 29, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #8
    @ Samantha A. Torrence
    Scary? Nah, it'll just build up the good ole Immune system. I used to eat Icicles that formed on my roof and I am just fine *twitch twitch*


    I know I did the same thing! Even the grandkids have snapped an icicle off the roof to suck on! Ahhh...those were the days...!

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?