The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

Op-Ed: Naked or nude, the tube caves on sexy poster

Posted Feb 26, 2008 by  lensman67 in Arts | 7 comments | 3066 views
Next in Arts
Related News
2 more articles on this subject:
Advertising
Officials at the London Transport Authority have beat an ignominious retreat in the face of world wide ridicule and agreed to put up posters depicting a 16th century nude painting intended to advertise an art show at the Royal Academy
After making an obscure art show for little known 16th century artist Lucas Cranach a world wide sensation the transit officials have reversed their original decision to ban the 500 year old painting on "moral" grounds.

The affair cause widespread laughter in a country famous for its topless pinups, known as "Page three girls" that adorn many family newspapers. The fashion for newspaper cheesecake was started in The Sun back in 1969 when Conservative publisher Rupert Murdoch owned the paper.

Asked what caused all the brouhaha Jennifer Francis, spokeswoman for the Royal Academy said:

“I think it is because she's totally nude as opposed to say she's topless. We're shocked. We wouldn't have put a poster design forward if we thought it was offensive."


Cranach's portrait of Martin Luther
Although Lucas Cranach also painted several portraits of his friend, and daughter's godfather, Martin Luther as well as did illustrations for an edition of his Bible Francis explained that the painting, entitled "Venus" had been chosen because it best represents Cranach's work.

"We actually thought it was quite an innocent painting."

The posters went up on February 22 and so far there have been no reports of spontaneous orgies breaking out on the tube nor has anyone been struck blind by having to view the racy art work.

Cranach's Bible illustration
article:250870:13::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Feb 26, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #1
    This nudity thing is beyond ridiculous. I wonder how much of it has been caused by Tony Blair's religious influence. It'll take quite a while to undo the damage this guy has done.
  • avatar Posted Feb 26, 2008 by  lensman67
    #2
    @ Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    This nudity thing is beyond ridiculous. I wonder how much of it has been caused by Tony Blair's religious influence. It'll take quite a while to undo the damage this guy has done.

    It will take quite a while to undo the damage that all those who would impose their morality on other people has done.

    The proper way to deal with Philistines, the way that won here, is to laugh at them.

    "Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?"
  • avatar Posted Feb 26, 2008 by  Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    #3
    @ lensman67
    It will take quite a while to undo the damage that all those who would impose their morality on other people has done.

    The proper way to deal with Philistines, the way that won here, is to laugh at them.

    "Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?"
    Indeed. It isn't always that simple, unfortunately. But then again, nothing worthwhile ever is.
  • avatar Posted Feb 27, 2008 by  lensman67
    #4
    @ Bart B. Van Bockstaele
    Indeed. It isn't always that simple, unfortunately. But then again, nothing worthwhile ever is.

    Why are Conservatives like pasteurized yogurt?

    Neither has an active culture. ;o)
  • avatar Posted Feb 27, 2008 by  lensman67
    #5
    The Transit Authority's new stupidity, trying to "protect" the public from a poster for the play "Fat Jesus" sums us what the whole "politically correct" BS is about.

    The true problem is the tyranny of the minority who wish to impose their "values" on the rest of society, and are willing to use the government to do it.

    There are lots of images and words I find offensive but I draw the line at censorship! To criticize someone who makes racists, sexist or homophobic slurs is one thing, and an important part of free speech. Baning the offending images or speech is quite a different matter.

    Freedom is not about protecting only those things we like, it must be about protecting those things we find offensive or it is meaningless.
  • MEA Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  MEA
    #6
    Nice to see philistines and luddites losing one now and again.
  • avatar Posted Feb 28, 2008 by  lensman67
    #7
    @ MEA
    Nice to see philistines and luddites losing one now and again.

    Wait until November. They are going to lose a whole bunch of ones! It is back to the "wilderness" for another 40 years for them. (;o)

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?