The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageFather Files $4-Million Lawsuit After 12-Year-Old Subjected to Gay Porn

Posted Feb 21, 2008 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop) in Lifestyle | 16 comments | 723 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
Kent Blackwelder of Tennessee has filed a $4-million lawsuit against Delaware-based Specialty Publications which promotes adult gay material. His 12-year-old daughter opened an unsolicited mailer and was shocked to see photos of naked men having sex.
The 12-year-old, identified only as Mary Doe, was curious about the envelope. The outside said it contained a "Free DVD", and Mary apparently believed it was an offer from Disney. She excitedly opened the envelope and was shocked and embarrassed to find not a Disney cartoon, but the DVD "Titan Men's Farm Fresh," and promotional material for a gay adult magazine. The promotional items included explicit photos of naked men engaged together in various sexual positions.

Mary Doe was horrified and ran immediately to show her father what she had discovered in the envelope. Her father stated that he, too, was disgusted, embarrassed and enraged. So enraged that he has filed the suit seeking $4 million in damages.

The suit alleges the company flagrantly violated federal law governing the mailing of sexually oriented advertisements.
"As a result of the negligence of Specialty Publications, the [Blackwelders] have sustained great pain of body and mind and emotional stress, including shock, horror, humiliation and embarrassment as well as anxiety," according to the lawsuit.

Court papers show that Blackwelder is seeking $350,000 in compensatory damages plus $3.5 million in punitive damages.

Specialty Publications has declined comment on the lawsuit.

I was curious about the "unsolicited" statement. I wondered if the only way someone could mail pornographic material to someone would be only if they requested that material.

What I discovered was rather surprising. According to US Code 39, part IV, Chapter 30 it is the responsibility of the individual to file with their local post office, stating that they do not want pornographic material mailed to their home. On top of that, they may be responsible for any expenses incurred by the Postal Service in order to screen their mail for such material as they may deem offensive.

That being said, I don't see how this man can win this suit, but it bothers me that the law errs on the side of the pornographic solicitors instead of the general population.

Does anyone else have a problem with this? I had always been under the impression that such material had to be solicited in order to show up in someones mailbox, but I was obviously wrong.
article:250659:15::0
4 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Feb 21, 2008 by  Chris Hogg
    #1
    You have to opt-out of porn mail? And you have to pay for it? What?

    I have never been mailed anything pornographic so I wonder if there are stricter guidelines in Canada? We did a story on a guy who runs a sex art shop awhile back and Canada Post would not mail a pamphlet that had the word "penis" on it, as far as I remember. It was that strict.

    Have you or anyone else on DJ ever received porn in the mail?
  • avatar Posted Feb 21, 2008 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #2
    I wouldn't consider it "porn" per se, but when I subscribed to Playboy magazine I would get alot of solicitation for DVD's and such with some pretty explicit photos. No totally nude stuff or anything at all like what this guy says he received.

    I am thinking he had to have accessed some website or done something to end up on a mailing list that would send such graphic stuff to his house. Seriously. I also wonder about the envelope the girl opened. It would seem to me that it would have to say something about "sexually explicit material inside" or some sort of warning. Can the girl read? What made her think it was from Disney?

    I don't know, the story seems sort of bogus to me....the only thing I learned was our lame Postal laws regarding having to opt out of porno mailings.
  • avatar Posted Feb 21, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #3
    Pam-It doesn't shock me at all that the postal laws would be written such that one must bare the burden of blocking certain mailings BUT it disturbs me deeply that pornography is freely sent!

    IF I request porn at my address and get the ball rolling, then ok-I can see. So if papa bear got a little curious ONE TIME ONLY, he kind of lost that protection. But if he didn't, I just cannot believe there aren't rights preventing porn being randomly sent for this very reason.

    With the way the law is written, doesn't sound like papa or his traumatized daughter have a chance of winning. Lets hope the judge sees differently!

    My 5 year old gets my mail! Could you imagine? I would be up some company's arse!
  • avatar Posted Feb 21, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #4
    If my 8 year old daughter got hold of something like that, there would DEFINITELY be hell to pay.
  • avatar Posted Feb 21, 2008 by  Bocephalus
    #5
    I would be upset also but I still think the suit is frivilous. It doesn't make sense that sexually explicit material can be sent w/o prior approval.

    Possibly more to this story..
  • avatar Posted Feb 21, 2008 by  Sheba
    #6
    Disturbing. If papa bear is guilty of visiting a porno site, why sue? If on the other hand he had a filter on the family computer and this came thru, then just maybe he has a case.
  • avatar Posted Feb 21, 2008 by  DRNETWORK
    #7
    Part of a BIG problem is mailing lists that are sold. My wife and I have different last names and we bought a computer 15 yrs ago. I still get mail with her last name attached to my first name. I have told many people when they call and the bottom line is it's too much of a bother for them. No one wants to take responsibility for this. Of course, it's nothing compared to what this poor little girl had to encounter, but there may be a similar situation with a mailing list bought...Just remembered another example is my deceased mother-in-law still gets a LOT of mail. The companies expect that it's no big deal because they're making a profit, but some companies had better be more careful or it could cost them a lot more than postage.

    http://TheBigManWalking.blogspot.com

    http://www.FreeRice.com
  • avatar Posted Feb 22, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #8
    Sheba-this came into the snailmail MAILBOX! Not the puter emailbox......so like, when I say to my 5 year old son -hey baby, go get the mail for mommy-and he comes back w/ -hey, why are these 2 boys licking each others' penis'......how do I handle that one? I would be calm in front of him of course but a frivolous lawsuit as someone suggested, this is not. This could damage the innocent mind of a child.
  • avatar Posted Feb 22, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #9
    Unreal. Hard enough to monitor what your kids do online but to have things come into your home is simply ridiculous.
  • avatar Posted Feb 22, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #10
    Could this be because he was in Big Brother 2 and perhaps has a fan out there? Not saying that what has happened is right, but it could explain how this might have happened.
  • avatar Posted Feb 22, 2008 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #11
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Could this be because he was in Big Brother 2 and perhaps has a fan out there? Not saying that what has happened is right, but it could explain how this might have happened.

    Good point - maybe someone signed him up to receive crap like this.
  • avatar Posted Feb 22, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #12
    @ Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    Good point - maybe someone signed him up to receive crap like this.


    It's possible. People have been known to pull crap like that on the unsuspecting. A good "ha-ha" joke gone wrong.
  • avatar Posted Feb 22, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #13
    Deb and Pam-that would be a sad joke, eh? Or Peter Postmaster accidentally put it in wrong box? I just can't help but think daddy had to have signed up for some sort of porn. Something! A novelty book? That could get him on a list and open up doors beyond his little po-dunk tennessee mindset.

    I still have to view it from a mom's perspective! :O) KICK ASS NOW, take names later! LOL!
  • avatar Posted Feb 22, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #14
    @ Nikki W (karateblossom)
    Deb and Pam-that would be a sad joke, eh? Or Peter Postmaster accidentally put it in wrong box? I just can't help but think daddy had to have signed up for some sort of porn. Something! A novelty book? That could get him on a list and open up doors beyond his little po-dunk tennessee mindset.

    I still have to view it from a mom's perspective! :O) KICK ASS NOW, take names later! LOL!


    I hear what you're saying, KB (karateblossom...good nickname for you..."KB"! LOL!). This is one of those situations that you could read a few different scenarios into. I guess it'll all come out in the wash! :)
  • Samantha A. Torrence Posted Feb 22, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #15
    Wow.... Just Wow.... this kind of stuff should never land in the sights of children. Exposure to sexual stimulation, gay or straight, at too young of an age can cause unhealthy issues with sex. I have heard of kids who have felt violated, short of being abused by seeing this kind of stufff. That can have an effect later on in life. I don't think people understand that depending on the child this can be quite serious.
  • Hargrove Posted Mar 5, 2008 by  Hargrove
    #16
    At one point I was receiving pornographic material by e-mail, and I never visited a porn website. The only way I could get rid of it was to change e-mail service.

    I'm an adult and the images were shocking. I hate that any person, never mind a child, would be subjected to it.

    I think the burden for these things should be on the sender. They should make themselves known and only send to those who solicit their materials. I think that it is wrong that people have to assume responsibility for others invading their space. They're doing the outreach, they should be responsible for only sending it to people who request it.

    Actually, I think that pornography should not be main stream. You should have to pursue it, it should not pursue you. Our government gives the purveyors of immorality free access to us and then tells us that we have to take responsibility for it. Clearly this is not the will of the people. One more reason to get legislatures, and hopefully a president, who care about people.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?