The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageOp-Ed: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness

Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey in Politics | 86 comments | 739 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
There is an oddity that drives the Liberal Proponents of Guilt and Shame to frenzied hate and pitiful rhetoric filled with platitudes, bumper sticker sloganeering and utter contempt for those which do not comply or adhere to the Liberal Pathology.
It is painfully obvious to the vast majority that the over emotional weaklings cannot be trusted to be alone with themselves let alone be in positions of responsibility.

Some time ago, Family Security Matters conducted a study that revealed many issues of the liberal mindset and explained in detail that which most of already knew but did not understand The Why. This group brings to discussion topics such as Liberal pathology, Liberals are like children, A rage that knows no bounds, Fathoming liberal rage, Rage trumps rationality, Symptoms of liberal pathology, Diagnosing liberal pathology, Symptoms of liberal pathology and Diagnosing liberal pathology.

Rick Moran has attempted to clarify the Liberal Mindset of BDS but to this writer, it falls short of the mindset. The mental disorder that is all so prevalent in the psychological make up of the modern day Liberal has been further diagnosed and made public by Charles Krauthammer. Among other things: From 1975-1978, Krauthammer was a Resident and then a Chief Resident in Psychiatry at the Massachusetts General Hospital. During this time he and a colleague identified a form of mania (a part of bipolar disorder) which they named "secondary mania" and published a second important paper. The standard textbook for bipolar disease ("Manic Depressive Illness" by Goodwin and Jamison) contains nine citations of his work.

[...] In 1981, following the defeat of the Carter/Mondale ticket, Krauthammer began his journalistic career, joining The New Republic as a writer and editor. His New Republic writings won the 1984 "National Magazine Award for Essays and Criticism." In 1983, he began writing essays for Time magazine. In 1985, he began a weekly column for the Washington Post for which he won the 1987 Pulitzer Prize for commentary.

In 2006, the Financial Times named Krauthammer the most influential commentator in America, saying "Krauthammer has influenced US foreign policy for more than two decades. He coined and developed 'The Reagan Doctrine' in 1985 and he defined the US role as sole superpower in his essay, 'The Unipolar Moment', published shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Krauthammer's 2004 speech 'Democratic Realism' set out a framework for tackling the post 9/11 world, focusing on the promotion of democracy in the Middle East."

On the other hand, left-wing commentators have been quite hostile to Krauthammer. In a 2006 column in The American Prospect criticizing The New Republic and other proponents of democratization in Arab countries, Matthew Yglesias wrote that Krauthammer is "very possibly the worst journalist working in America today, a relentlessly pernicious force, never right about anything, who feels his commentary should not be shackled by the small-minded bonds of accuracy or logic." [...]


I find it curious that the "left" berates Mr Krauthammer to the degree that they do but, taking into consideration of the pathological mindset of the modern day Liberal, it really isn't much of a surprise at all, in the end run.

In December of 2003, Mr Krauthammer published the following article in many publications and the link to one of the publications is here:

Bush Derangement Syndrome

[...] It has been 25 years since I discovered a psychiatric syndrome (for the record: "Secondary Mania,'' Archives of General Psychiatry, November 1978), and in the interim I haven't been looking for new ones. But it's time to don the white coat again. A plague is abroad in the land.

Bush Derangement Syndrome: the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency -- nay -- the very existence of George W. Bush. [...]


And, so, it is no surprise that these studies have been further investigated. Such a study is here and now.

In a new publication resulting from years of study and documentation by top mental disorder doctoral investigations, we now have at our disposal a new book: THE LIBERAL MIND: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, by Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., M.D.

Why do today's liberals act and think as they do? The radical left's politics and its destructive effects on our basic freedoms have provoked many to speculate on what makes these people tick.

The Liberal Mind answers the question. This book is the first systematic analysis of the political madness that now threatens to destroy history's greatest achievement: the American dream of civilized liberty.

In his penetrating analysis, Dr. Rossiter reveals modern liberalism's assaults on:
* Our freedom to make good lives for ourselves
* The ability of families to raise children to be self-reliant and mutual
* The morals, rights and laws that protect our freedoms

"Modern liberalism's irrationality can only be understood as the product of psychopathology. So extravagant are the patterns of thinking, emoting, behaving and relating that characterize the liberal mind that its relentless protests and demands become understandable only as disorders of the psyche." The Liberal Mind reveals the madness of the modern liberal for what it is: a massive transference neurosis acted out in the world's political arenas, with devastating effects on the institutions of liberty.

The unexamined political belief is not worth holding.

The unanalyzed political agenda is not worth promoting.


Get used to the irrationality of the 2008 election processes and be aware of the mindless mantra of "change" where the "change" is not clearly defined nor is it known.
article:250437:14::0
4 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #1
    I think the author said it best when he said,
    "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."


    Little wonder Dr. Lyle Rossiter would consider Liberals are "Nuts!"
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #2
    You may be interested in our upcoming show this coming Thursday with Dr Rossiter.

    It is time that we had compassion for those that are suffering from this disorder and get them the professional help which they are in dire need of.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #3
    Is it any wonder why there hasn't been any "studies" like this for conservatives?
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #4
    there has been several studies on the anderthal
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #5
    @ Randyscandy
    there has been several studies on the anderthal


    I noticed that as usual, the immature offer no substantiation.

    Imagine that?
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #6
    you think aha; a conservative is just like a caveman it's who has the bigger club you may use some big words names and links but its a club in any way you look at it
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #7
    @ Randyscandy
    you think aha; a conservative is just like a caveman it's who has the bigger club you may use some big words names and links but its a club in any way you look at it


    Obsess much?
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #8
    While I'm sure Randy's reference to dinosaur studies was intended as another liberal slur, it might interest him to know there was just such a study .......... from Bezerkely, no less

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    Imagine if they had asked hard core communists to study and define democracy.

    Researchers help define what makes a political conservative

    They Blinded Me with Science, Dissecting the conservative mind!
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #9
    LOL!!
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #10
    Was one of their conclusions:

    A conservative has common traits are that they aren't looking for anything from anyone — just the promise to be able to make their own way on a level playing field. In many cases, they are an independent businessman and employs several people. They pay more than their share of taxes and works hard.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #11
    Was one of their conclusions:

    The victimhood syndrome buzzwords — “disenfranchised,” “marginalized” and “voiceless” — don’t resonate with them. “Press ‘one’ for English” is a curse-word to them. They're used to picking up the tab, whether it’s the company Christmas party, three sets of braces, three college educations or a beautiful wedding.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #12
    yes an attack from a big bad liberal and i did vote for PET in the 70's
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #13
    Coming out of Bezerkely, they wouldn't have had a decent thing to say about true lovers of liberty and those of us willing to defend it.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #14
    @ Randyscandy
    yes an attack from a big bad liberal and i did vote for PET in the 70's


    Thank you for confirming the study.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #15
    @ LewWaters
    Coming out of Bezerkely, they wouldn't have had a decent thing to say about true lovers of liberty and those of us willing to defend it.


    They would if we were Stalinists, like themselves.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #16
    You know I always spoke tongue in cheek about BDS as well as making sure I separated the far fat left from the moderate rational left that simply disagrees with conservatives.

    To see these professionals analyze and zero in on the worse of the left, the farthest, extremists of the Democratic party, is quite scary.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #17
    Pathological psychological disorders?

    Man oh man, that explains so MUCH.

    Certain people can't help it because they're psychotics...

    Explains a lot, actually. I'm sure we'll be experiencing the results of that psychosis most any time, now....
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #18
    why do we put a lable on anyone if not to influnce others
    left right who cares
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #19
    well mark i got your thread started have fun my freind
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #20
    @ Mark L Harvey
    Is it any wonder why there hasn't been any "studies" like this for conservatives?


    Psychologists don't do research studies on people who use their rational minds, amigo ;)
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #21
    @ Randyscandy
    why do we put a lable on anyone if not to influnce others
    left right who cares


    @ Randyscandy
    well mark i got your thread started have fun my freind


    Thanks for the confirmation. Run away anytime. BTW, I do believe it was Lew that started the thread of comments but thanks anyway.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #22
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    Psychologists don't do research studies on people who use their rational minds, amigo ;)


    I forgot about that. My bad.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #23
    oh my mistake sorry bout that , is Dr Rossiter that has been treating John McCain the last few weeks
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #24
    @ Randyscandy
    oh my mistake sorry bout that , is Dr Rossiter that has been treating John McCain the last few weeks


    Again, no substantiation for a claim. Figures.

    Run along now. Recess is over.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #25
    @ Randyscandy
    oh my mistake sorry bout that , is Dr Rossiter that has been treating John McCain the last few weeks


    Someone needs to treat McCain, but I don't believe it is Dr. Rossiter. From his book, I believe he would do better with either Obama or Hitlery.

    But, since neither cares to explain or specify just what they mean by "change," and so many line up behind both, perhaps he needs to start a nationwide treatment seminar for liberals disconnected from reality.

    Maybe they could actually come up with just exactly what their qualifications for the presidency is.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #26
    That would not be possible to achieve. We already know what their qualifications are.

    ZIP.

    A blank piece of paper.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #27
    lol i must say there is not a lot of choice its a big mess for america in 08
  • MEA Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  MEA
    #28
    Arguing with people whose entire philosophy is based on superior force of arms is always a waste of energy; but on this blog it is futile.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #29
    @ MEA
    Arguing with people whose entire philosophy is based on superior force of arms is always a waste of energy; but on this blog it is futile.

    we must try to stop the sky from falling
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #30
    @ Randyscandy
    lol i must say there is not a lot of choice its a big mess for america in 08


    I won't argue with this. Neither party is currently running a "front-runner" worthy of holding office, in my opinion.

    But, from the looks of voter turn-out in the primaries, we will most likely have Hitlery or Obama the next 4 years.

    Wouldn't it be great if those supporting them and voting for them could list their actual qualifications?

    If they can't, why support and vote for them?

    I believe that relates back to Dr. Rossiter's assertion that liberals are "nuts!"

    MEA:
    Arguing with people whose entire philosophy is based on superior force of arms


    If that were true, we wouldn't be choosing from three unqualified candidates, would we?
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #31
    you are not far off len choice is pick the best of the worst its not going to be fun to follow bush and i think this has kept a few good men at home
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #32
    With the poor choices were have, whoever gets the office will have even many liberals longing for Bush by 2012, I believe.

    That's the price the country will pay for ignoring the Politics of Personal Destruction brought upon it a few years ago.

    Hard core liberals infested with deep BDS will nevr admit it, though.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #33
    untill there is a third choice nothing will change the hatered will grow and a divided nation will fight on
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #34
    @ MEA
    Arguing with people whose entire philosophy is based on superior force of arms is always a waste of energy; but on this blog it is futile.


    More lame unsubstantiated tripe. Fits the pathology.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #35
    @ LewWaters
    If that were true, we wouldn't be choosing from three unqualified candidates, would we?


    Bingo.

    The Presidency is a moot point now.

    We MUST take Congress, the Lower House, this election cycle with conservative Reps. I ran across this comment on a blog the other day:


    "... The Democrats are terrified. They say that Bush is a fearmonger...but the Dems only ever react out of fear. Right now, the fear of the Nutroot liberal extremists defeating Dems in the primaries is outpacing their fear of losing in the general election. The Maryland primary claimed Al Wynn already. They remember how Joe Lieberman was treated. So out of fear they reacted. The funny part is this vote right here has doomed them. They further to the left they go to satisfy the MoveOn wing, the worse of a margin they'll lose by in the general election in 2008. This vote will claim dozens of Dems in the general election. Act Blue and Blue America and these Soros-powered astroturf groups are the end of the Dems. Hillary or Obama, it won't matter. An ugly convention, an even uglier election season where "weak on terrorism" Dems get destroyed in debates and in ads, and it's the end of them. And you think America's going to go with the Dems when they know they will raise taxes on the middle class? Result? GOP House and White House in 2008 and in striking range of a GOP Senate in 2010...."
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #36
    @ Randyscandy
    you are not far off len choice is pick the best of the worst its not going to be fun to follow bush and i think this has kept a few good men at home


    lay off the 'shrooms or alcohol and speak coherently
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #37
    @ LewWaters
    With the poor choices were have, whoever gets the office will have even many liberals longing for Bush by 2012, I believe.

    That's the price the country will pay for ignoring the Politics of Personal Destruction brought upon it a few years ago.

    Hard core liberals infested with deep BDS will nevr admit it, though.


    We are indeed in interesting times.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #38
    @ Randyscandy
    untill there is a third choice nothing will change the hatered will grow and a divided nation will fight on


    Sorry. A third party won't help. The issue is this: socialism and our Federal Republic cannot co-exist in the same country. One of them has to go.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #39
    oh yes there is onely right or wrong no room for in between such a simple thought gee life is great
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #40
    @ Mark L Harvey
    Sorry. A third party won't help. The issue is this: socialism and our Federal Republic cannot co-exist in the same country. One of them has to go.


    @ Randyscandy
    oh yes there is onely right or wrong no room for in between such a simple thought gee life is great


    The two ideologies lie in contradiction with each other. Contradictions can not exist.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #41
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    The two ideologies lie in contradiction with each other. Contradictions can not exist.


    I'm getting dizzy.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #42
    08 is the end of the gop as we know it theres nothing left of it the leader i mccain a liberial
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #43
    @ Randyscandy
    08 is the end of the gop as we know it theres nothing left of it the leader i mccain a liberial


    It's only the end for now. Like in 1980, America will be thirsting for a true leader by 2012, especially is either Obama or Clinton win, as expected.

    As for a third party, it would have to be conservative, since conservatism has been abandoned currently, and strong. For any of the multitudes of lesser parties to gain significant strength to challenge either the Democrat or Republican Party will take decades and result in that length of time of Democrat control.

    I doubt the country could survive while waiting. Better to retake the GOP and let America see the strong ties to Socialism promoted by the current Democrat Party.

    First, the American public needs to wake up and address the enemy banging at our door.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #44
    I don't think the GOP is dead. If that is the case, the Democrat party died with Billy Bob Cigar Boy Clinton.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #45
    oh your speaking to me again mark lol 29 members will not seek reelection in 08 its the end of the bush crap and there all looking to hide from the mess left from bush the whole gop has to be rebuilt maccain is just the fool left holding the bag
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #46
    @ Randyscandy
    oh your speaking to me again mark lol 29 members will not seek reelection in 08 its the end of the bush crap and there all looking to hide from the mess left from bush the whole gop has to be rebuilt maccain is just the fool left holding the bag


    What are you babbling about and why are you such a coward and unwilling to back up that which you claim? Do you have nothing original to offer or are you relegated to being a parrot of another?
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #47
    ooooow i need links
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #48
    @ Randyscandy
    ooooow i need links


    Normal protocol is for the one making the assertion to supply the links.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #49
    oh a quote or two could do here's a quote mark your op-ed is bs im just calling you on it you may need to find a venue where people will eat up this shit
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #50
    @ Randyscandy
    oh a quote or two could do here's a quote mark your op-ed is bs im just calling you on it you may need to find a venue where people will eat up this shit


    That is EXACTLY what this post is about. Your emotional inability to reason and support anything you have to say.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #51
    links my ass just show your true self
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #52
    mark is pushing an angenda that all lib. are nuts
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #53
    @ Randyscandy
    mark is pushing an angenda that all lib. are nuts


    The pathology fits and you are proving it. Keep up the good work.
  • avatar Posted Feb 16, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #54
    @ Randyscandy
    links my ass just show your true self



    You are doing that very well. Run away at any time.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #55
    its a old ploy mark not new i see this much too often on dj
    will you tire or will i the age old qure nevere dies
    the point is you can't give rednecks money
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #56
    @ Randyscandy
    its a old ploy mark not new i see this much too often on dj
    will you tire or will i the age old qure nevere dies
    the point is you can't give rednecks money


    The only thing I tire of is not found here so whatever it is that you are babbling about merely further proves the premise of the medical study so keep on yacking. It is indeed funny...in a sad way.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #57
    i wrote that for you
    don't be sad for me
    it brave of you to feel
    for the foe it shows
    your mellow ass is not all bad
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #58
    @ Randyscandy
    i wrote that for you
    don't be sad for me
    it brave of you to feel
    for the foe it shows
    your mellow ass is not all bad


    So, is it the browns or the reds that are bad this time around?
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #59
    not sure i just have nothing better do today
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #60
    @ Randyscandy
    not sure i just have nothing better do today


    Ah. So, you aren't sure which ones were bad. Des that mean you had both?
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #61
    im a deltiologist we have a loney life
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #62
    both what mark
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #63
    @ Mark L Harvey
    So, is it the browns or the reds that are bad this time around?

    a shallow assesment by any standard
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #64
    the shame one can endure as a liberal
    to think free without bounds frolic in new ideas
    touch ones self without fear
    image a world without a god
    fear no evil or goverment
    trust another human and befriend
    I AM A LIBERAL
    love me today
  • MEA Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  MEA
    #65
    @ LewWaters
    If that were true, we wouldn't be choosing from three unqualified candidates, would we?


    I think they are unqualified, you apparently think so; but gee Lew that is just two of us.
    Looks like about two hundred fifty million people must be of other minds, eh..?
  • MEA Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  MEA
    #66
    @ Randyscandy
    oh your speaking to me again mark lol 29 members will not seek reelection in 08 its the end of the bush crap and there all looking to hide from the mess left from bush the whole gop has to be rebuilt maccain is just the fool left holding the bag


    So far the Democrats have proven as corrupt as the Republicans they replaced and even worse as leaders. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have shown me nothing at all.

    The picture I'm starting to put together in my mind is of rats--realizing the ship is about to sink--deserting in droves.

    The United States of America--after 28 years of corporate ownership of the government--has nothing left to offer.
    BUSHIs have performed the function of scavengers after No. 40, No. 41 and No. 42 destroyed everything.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #67
    @ MEA
    So far the Democrats have proven as corrupt as the Republicans they replaced and even worse as leaders. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have shown me nothing at all.

    The picture I'm starting to put together in my mind is of rats--realizing the ship is about to sink--deserting in droves.

    The United States of America--after 28 years of corporate ownership of the government--has nothing left to offer.
    BUSHIs have performed the function of scavengers after No. 40, No. 41 and No. 42 destroyed everything.

    their bakcrupt and on the run the gop spent amierica
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #68
    the imagrant are fleeing the saying is its better to be poor at home than a strange land
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #69
    @ Randyscandy
    the shame one can endure as a liberal
    to think free without bounds frolic in new ideas
    touch ones self without fear
    image a world without a god
    fear no evil or goverment
    trust another human and befriend
    I AM A LIBERAL
    love me today


    definately the browns
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #70
    @ Randyscandy
    their bakcrupt and on the run the gop spent amierica


    well, it could be the reds
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #71
    @ Randyscandy
    the imagrant are fleeing the saying is its better to be poor at home than a strange land


    nope...must be the combo of the reds and the browns
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #72
    it about your post .its crap get a real thought ,why lean on others to make a point if you can't stand alone as a auther so be it
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #73
    @ Randyscandy
    it about your post .its crap get a real thought ,why lean on others to make a point if you can't stand alone as a auther so be it


    So, then, you are a parrot and you have no original thought ability. I thought as much.

    Run along little one.
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #74
    scary is it not you may have to own up to you words show me som mauxi mark
  • Randyscandy Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Randyscandy
    #75
    all links and quotes no depth a dj want=a=be
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #76
    @ MEA
    I think they are unqualified, you apparently think so; but gee Lew that is just two of us.
    Looks like about two hundred fifty million people must be of other minds, eh..?


    Not necessarily. Based upon turn-out in the primaries, it may be only about 30 million out of all, a real low percentage.

    I expect to see in November a small percentage of the population turn out for either side.

    My efforts aren't towards the presidency but towards State and local elections now, to counter what I fear will be the inevitable.
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #77
    Exactly so, Lew. The battleground is in the Lower House this election and next.

    The Presidency is a moot point at this time.
  • MEA Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  MEA
    #78
    I haven't studied any data; but everything I have heard about the primaries this year indicate record high turnout. It may be that the popular, reactionary media is simply exaggerating the political response; but nothing I've seen would support that point of view.
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #79
    Amazing. Admitting to not seeing any data and yet trying to come to some conclusion. LOL
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #80
    @ Susan Duclos
    Amazing. Admitting to not seeing any data and yet trying to come to some conclusion. LOL


    "They" just don't get it nor do "they" see it. Every statement "they" have made so far confirms the studies.

    Simply amazing.
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Susan Duclos
    #81
    @ Mark L Harvey
    "They" just don't get it nor do "they" see it. Every statement "they" have made so far confirms the studies.

    Simply amazing.


    It is why I love seeing them comment. Not as interesting as debating with the moderates, because with them, you have to actually use your brain, but the others make perfect examples which has its benefits too.
  • MEA Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  MEA
    #82
    This crowd is just too comfortably ensconced in this blog for their own good. I think they need to look beyond its walls for some enlightenment.
    Perhaps you folks could move away from the monitor for a few minutes?
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #83
    @ MEA
    This crowd is just too comfortably ensconced in this blog for their own good. I think they need to look beyond its walls for some enlightenment.
    Perhaps you folks could move away from the monitor for a few minutes?


    Seems like you spend an awful lot of time in front of your monitor as well!
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Helena Handbasket
    #84
    @ MEA
    This crowd is just too comfortably ensconced in this blog for their own good. I think they need to look beyond its walls for some enlightenment.
    Perhaps you folks could move away from the monitor for a few minutes?


    Coming from you doing double time .... that's amusing.
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #85
    @ Susan Duclos
    It is why I love seeing them comment. Not as interesting as debating with the moderates, because with them, you have to actually use your brain, but the others make perfect examples which has its benefits too.


    The poor things started their own thread in opposition to this premise and they (lens) did the usual liberal cherry pick and distortion.

    Simply amazing and proves this premise.
  • avatar Posted Feb 17, 2008 by  Mark L Harvey
    #86
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Seems like you spend an awful lot of time in front of your monitor as well!


    ZAP.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?