The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageNo More Sandwiches: Starbucks to Trim Menu

Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Eric S. Wyatt in Business | 12 comments | 606 views
Next in Business
Related News
Advertising
Coffee giant Starbucks is trimming its menu in an attempt to re-position itself as the "leading roaster of specialty coffee in the world." The first items to go? Egg sandwiches.
By this fall patrons of the coffee chain will no longer be able to purchase the hot breakfast sandwiches in Starbucks stores.

According to a Yahoo News report, the sandwiches bring in about $35,000 in annual revenue in an average store. The move will cause short-term losses, but is part of a larger plan designed to pay off in the long-run.

The loss of revenue (while eyeing long-term sustainability) highlights the atmosphere of change in the company since Chairman and CEO Howard Schultz re-established his leadership.

"The decision and the courage it takes to remove something when there's pressure on the business — like the sandwiches — is emblematic that we're going to build for the long-term and get back to the roots and the core of our heritage, which is the leading roaster of specialty coffee in the world," Schultz told The Associated Press.

Last quarter, Starbucks saw sales slide in older stores (those open more than 13 months) and overall profits rose by only 2 per cent. The company is looking for ways to regain some of its slipping market share. Recent announcements have indicated the company plans to slow down its expansion plans domestically, and at the same time is offering new incentives to customers like the $1 cup of coffee reported earlier. These reports preceded today's announcement regarding breakfast sandwiches in the recent flurry of activity surrounding the chain's sluggish earnings.

Other changes are also in the works, and the CEO promises they will be big. Investors and consumers are eager to hear more details, but Schultz indicated the company won't release details of the "five bold innovations" until its annual meeting on March 19.
article:249607:16::0
5 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Chris Hogg
    #1
    Interesting move and there is clearly a branding or cost issue behind this. It might bring in $35K per store, but how much does it cost the company per store? If the profit margin is too low this move makes sense.
  • atroxodisse Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  atroxodisse
    #2
    That's so sad. They're breakfast sandwiches were by far the best tasting and most filling breakfast sandwiches you could buy.
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #3
    I read in another article, Schultz said the egg and cheese sandwich smell overrides the coffee smell, so he had to remove this one. They are saying we can't compete with McDonald's :) It is facing too many competition from various sources now.
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Eric S. Wyatt
    #4
    really??? i have never noticed the smell out-competing the coffee...so much so that i've never tried one of the sandwiches....
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #5
    I have never had anything there but their chai tea latte which is the best.
    I have never tried anything else.
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #6
    Nor have I tried anything other than their coffee. Interesting move though.
  • Haley January Eckels Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Haley January Eckels
    #7
    It fits with Schultz's original vision for Starbucks. They've always done one thing very well (specialty coffee), and it always spells trouble for a company when they branch off in too many directions.

    This does seem to coincide with McDonald's stepping up their coffee offerings, and instead of emulating the McDonald's model, I think Schultz has made a good decision.

    Picasso, I'm also a fan of the chai latte. Something tells me McD will never go that route. :)
  • atroxodisse Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  atroxodisse
    #8
    @ Haley January Eckels
    It fits with Schultz's original vision for Starbucks. They've always done one thing very well (specialty coffee), and it always spells trouble for a company when they branch off in too many directions.

    Branching off is how companies stay alive. Diversification is what keeps a company from hitting a brick wall when their industry takes a hit. Just look at IBM. They make most of their money in services now. They sold off their PC division. Look at Tim Horton's donuts. They were a crappy little coffee and donut shop. Now they make loads of money selling sandwiches.

    The specialty coffee industry is very strong right now but if we hit a bad recession(and you know we will), people will stop spending loads of money on coffee. If McDonalds coffee starts being of equal or better quality to Starbucks then it will hit their profits hard. On the other hand if they have branched off into other product lines they could survive. Any good stock broker will tell you to diversify, because any industry good take a hit at any time. Starbucks isn't stupid though, which is why introduced the $1 coffee which really isn't their market, that's more of a McDonalds thing.
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #9
    Not such a bad move....although, I must say despite my 3 mo at sbux, I had never (nor have ever)seen or heard about hot breakfast sandwiches. Even in our 40 + hr of initial training, we focused on the core (bar drinks and frappaccino)....and pastry case.

    I have eaten their lunch sandwiches ($6 ea)! Wow, interesting!

    McDonalds coffee still tastes like crap compared to a 6 pump soy chai or an eggnog latte with xfoam n nutmeg. MickyD's is still my favorite fry (1 am after too much drinkin!).

    Interesting article!
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #10
    @ Haley January Eckels
    Picasso, I'm also a fan of the chai latte. Something tells me McD will never go that route. :)


    Even if McD tried to make a chai latte I doubt if it could come anywhere near to comparing to Starbucks.

    I have only had one or two others that I thought were any good.
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  aarontrippedout
    #11
    so what the heck does this mean? A raise in the already high priced fake coffee?
  • avatar Posted Jan 31, 2008 by  Nikki W (karateblossom)
    #12
    aaron,
    I hope not! I love my sbux coffee but at least I have the recipes in my head!

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?