The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

New Hampshire Primary Recount Begins

Posted Jan 16, 2008 by  Eric S. Wyatt in Politics | 2 comments | 383 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
The recount of ballots from last week's New Hampshire Primary began today, as requested by Democrat Dennis Kucinich and Republican Albert Howard. The bi-partisan call for a recount came after candidates noticed various discrepancies in the final tally.
According to a report on the Boston-area television station WBZTv.com, New Hampshire's Secretary of State indicated his office is prepared for the recount to begin.

The report indicated that Rep. Kucinich has submitted $27,000 to begin the process of hand counting ballots. The process can be stopped at any time, and remaining funds would be returned to the candidate. The estimate to re-count all of the Democratic ballots in the state is reported to be about $70,000.

Howard, a Michigan resident who was one of the fringe candidates included on New Hampshire's Republican primary ballot, posted to his web site that the money to fund the recount had been secured and reported: "The recount is on!!" At about $0.24 per ballot, the estimate for the Republican recount on a state-wide basis is around $55,000.

According to WBZTV.com, "Kucinich has asked that the re-count start with Manchester ballots and spread out from there to other Hillsborough County precincts." It is likely that Howard will also ask to tailor the recount to identified areas where discrepancies, if any, will most quickly be uncovered. It is probable that the entire state will NOT be recounted in either case, even though Kucinich's stated purpose is not to uncover large-scale counting errors, but to "make sure all the ballots...are counted."

According to the report, counting began this morning at 9:30 a.m. As reported earlier, New Hampshire election officials are "confident" that the certified results are accurate.
article:248953:9::0
1 subscriber
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jan 16, 2008 by  Dave G. (TruthMan)
    #1
    Eric: It's a shame that it has to cost so much to recount the ballots. I know why Kucinich is doing it but to spend $27,000 out of his campaign war chest to count ballots where he only received single digits percentage-wise doesn't seem practical to me.
  • avatar Posted Jan 16, 2008 by  Eric S. Wyatt
    #2
    One has to wonder if there aren't "side" benefits for the two candidates here...maybe the continued publicity is seen as "helping" their campaigns by publicizing the candidates and giving their supporters something to give TO. You have to figure, for instance, that Albert Howard never raised anything near the $50k+ needed for this prior to calling for a recount. I haven't found out where he raised the money yet, but I have to think the money came in from the outside, somewhere. And while it is more true that Howard gains publicity, the same is true for Kucinich, who had - until the recount - pretty much faded into the background in the Obama-Clinton war...

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?