The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageDemocrat Seeks New Hampshire Recount

Posted Jan 11, 2008 by  Eric S. Wyatt in Politics | 8 comments | 627 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
Citing "serious and credible reports, allegations, and rumors" about vote tampering and fraud during Tuesday's New Hampshire Primary, one Democrat candidate is asking for a recount.
Even though he won less than two percent of the vote on Tuesday - and even though he doesn't think a recount will effect the outcome - Democrat Dennis Kucinich is asking New Hampshire election officials for a recount. The report states that the Congressman wants to be assured that "all the ballots in his party's contest were counted."

The candidate's website provides additional comment about the recount request:
I am not making this request in the expectation that a recount will significantly affect the number of votes that were cast on my behalf…It is imperative that these questions be addressed in the interest of public confidence in the integrity of the election process and the election machinery – not just in New Hampshire, but in every other state that conducts a primary electionEver since the 2000 election – and even before – the American people have been losing faith in the belief that their votes were actually counted. This recount isn’t about who won 39% of 36% or even 1%. It’s about establishing whether 100% of the voters had 100% of their votes counted exactly the way they cast them.
Kucinich is basing his demand for a recount in part on internet "rumors" regarding discrepancies between hand-counted votes and the votes run through election machines. According to the theory referenced by Kucinich, votes counted by hand favored Democrat Barack Obama over Hilary Clinton in opposition to the final results on Tuesday night. He also noted that the pre-primary polls were pointing to an outcome which much more resembled the hand-counted results than the final tally, which surprised political pundits and the campaigns alike.

David Scanlan, New Hampshire's Deputy Secretary of State, responded that he had "every confidence in the certified results, but inidcated that any candidate is entitled to a statewide recount. According to New Hampshire law, Kucinich will have to pay for the recount. Kucinich's campaign indicated the check was on its way.
article:248670:17::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jan 11, 2008 by  BoVandy
    #1
    Can you imagine if they actually find discrepancies? By the way, apparently there is a "minor" republican, who is only running in NH who is also calling for the recount, he says he was told he had around 150 votes about halfway through the night, and finished with just 42.

    until now, 80% of New Hampshire results have been "faith-based" meaning they were not actually counted, but tabulated by the easily hackable Diebold machines. The other 20% or so of the ballots were counted by hand at the polling places on Election Night
  • Haley January Eckels Posted Jan 11, 2008 by  Haley January Eckels
    #2
    Great article, I can't wait to see if anything comes of it. It certainly was a madhouse at my polling station on Tuesday, so I suspect that the crowds could have affected the way the count was done.
  • avatar Posted Jan 11, 2008 by  Eric S. Wyatt
    #3
    which republican is that? is there a link?
  • avatar Posted Jan 11, 2008 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #4
    I say Bravo to Kucinich for taking a stand and demanding this recount. Is it any wonder that we, the sheepl, have lost faith in our system? I mean look at how the media has consistently manipulated the entire process. Spin rooms and biased reporting, debates that don't debate anything......

    I don't trust the Diebold machines, I don't trust the entire process and I think that "they" already know who will be put into power. This is all smoke and mirrors if you ask me.

    The true, free democratic process in this country is no longer in existence imo.
  • avatar Posted Jan 11, 2008 by  BoVandy
    #5
    http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080110/NEWS06/80110061

    I had the numbers slightly off, but the premise remains the same, he ended with way less votes than first thought
  • avatar Posted Jan 12, 2008 by  restlessmind
    #6
    Albert Howard is the name of the Republican who has requested a recount. I don't know who he is or why he's doing this, but it's very much to the benefit of Ron Paul, who clearly had votes stolen. This discovery started with protests from three members of a Sutton Township family that their Paul votes had not been counted. The Town Clerk had reported zero votes for Paul, and a relative of the three had noted this result on the Politico map and come forward to complain. Caught red-handed, the clerk was forced to own up: the Paul tally in that town of about 350 voters came to 31. She attributed the discrepancy to "human error"! Since then, there have been other NH irregularities discovered, but I don't know the details.
  • avatar Posted Jan 12, 2008 by  Eric S. Wyatt
    #7
    interesting...it's not smart vote-fixing policy to ever give anyone zero....

    it would be interesting to know more...
  • avatar Posted Jan 12, 2008 by  Eric S. Wyatt
    #8
    follow up to this story posted here.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?