The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageOp-Ed: CNN Plays the Real Race Card on Barack Obama

Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Hargrove in Politics | 21 comments | 1434 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
The real race card is behavior designed to trigger unconscious or repressed racial attitudes, in order to inspire discriminatory behavior. Highlighting stereotypical physical and social characteristics can heighten racial attitudes.
Racism is mostly about what people don't get, because of their race. But sometimes it's about what they get too much of, for the same reason. CNN dished up too much of Barack Obama's family matters, with shades of racism and classism.

I've been watching political interviews for a very long time, and I've never seen a network conduct an independent interview with a candidate's grandmother, much less going to the outlands of another continent to do it.

On the day before the New Hampshire Primary, one would think that would be the focus of CNN's interview. One would expect questions about Barack’s campaign, and that his grandmother would be asked about her expectations respecting the New Hampshire Primary. But there were no such questions. As I watched, I came to understand that the viewer wasn't suppose to learn anything from Obama's grandmother, the point was for us to see Obama's grandmother. We were to see how black she is, and how poor she is, and impute that to him.

CNN wanted us to see Obama's peasant grandmother, in miss-matched head wrap and dress, shucking corn; surrounded by poverty and barnyard animals. CNN hoped we would share their awe, that "it is a possibility that the President of the United States could have a Kenya grandmother," calling it "as far-fetched as any piece of fiction."

If race and class didn't get you, CNN had another trick. Blame the victim. They imputed their racism to Barack's grandmother. Without a word from his grandmother, after all, she doesn't speak English. And without a word from the reporter on site, Kyra Phillips declared that Obama's grandmother did not want her son to marry a white woman.

So take your pick of CNN created reasons not to vote for Barack. His race and class, reflected in the person of his grandmother, or his grandmother's racism, manufactured out of the imagination of Kyra Phillips.

After Obama won the Iowa caucus, CNN's Wolf Blitzer kept telling us not to get the idea that it meant something. The next day Kyra Phillips showed us why.

Kyra's "dog and pony show" using Obama's grandmother, is not the first time CNN has used race and ethnic bias in an effort to diminish Barack Obama.

On January 1, 2006, in the Situation Room , Wolf Blitzer described a "man feared and hated around the world," to a backdrop of a picture of Osama bin Laden. But instead of bin Laden’s name in the caption, it read "Where's Obama?" Wolf claimed "mistake," but before anything printed is published it's handled and reviewed by several people. Who can believe that nobody caught such a glaring error?

On the February 19th edition of Paula Zahn Now, Kyra Phillips called Barack “Osama bin,” when asking film maker, John Ridley, about Barack’s leadership ability. Now here she is, a media word master, and she doesn't just get his name wrong, she includes a sound and syllable that isn’t even in his name. Like Wolf, she too claimed mistake. But isn't it interesting that ordinary people never make that mistake. Interchanging Obama's name with that of Osama Bin Laden, is a mistake reserved for people in media and politics, who don't support Barack Obama.

Again in February, Kyra Phillips bashed Barack Obama. This time while playing good cop bad cop with Bill Schneider. In the end they told us what they wanted us to hear, the words of Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, dissing Barack, and claiming that his policy on Iraq would "encourage those who want to completely destabilize and destroy Iraq," and that it would "create chaos and a victory for the terrorists." He then goes on to suggest that America's enemies should "hang on and hope for an Obama victory." So, the same CNN that can't distinguish the name of an American presidential candidate from that of a terrorist, bothers to tell us that some foreigner inferred that his candidacy will further the interest of terrorist.

Finally, CNN's Jack Cafferty tells us that Obama is black. Then he talks about "what many people think about black Americans in national politics." He does this on his way to introducing the idea that "Americans are tired of so-called 'identity politics', where people are defined by things like their ethnicity and gender." Then, as if to make sure that we know that he doesn't believe a word of it, he winds up by naming 10 "big-time black celebrities" who "haven’t announced their support for Obama." Inferring that there’s some relationship between being black and supporting Barack Obama, the very essence of "identity politics."

CNN played the real race card, in an attempt to bring Barack Obama under the effect of "identity politics," while pretending to oppose it. And they're deflecting their responsibility for it, by blaming "identity politics" on Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, like Kyra Phillips blamed Obama's grandmother, for the racially divisive words, that began in her mind, and came out of her mouth.
article:248558:36::0
4 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • Sadiq Green (Spolitics) Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Sadiq Green (Spolitics)
    #1
    CNN, in my opinion, has clearly picked Clinton as their horse in this race. I have felt a negitive vibe towards at CNN him for awhile now. This is a good report.
  • avatar Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Paul Wallis (Wanderlaugh)
    #2
    Nauseating. If CNN want to talk class, there's only one class of mentality that does this sort of thing.
  • Hillbilly Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Hillbilly
    #3
    You are right on.
    This is my post on this
    http://www.hillbillyreport.com/blog/2008/01/hillary-clinton.html
    I have the video up on youtube also.
  • avatar Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #4
    CNN has become a disgrace, it started of well but now it is like the other version of Fox news, very biased. This is a dirty trick, it seems like they are manipulating it successfully.
  • avatar Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  fleetwoodmac
    #5
    Interesting perspective. When I saw the piece I didn't get the impression that CNN as out to get Obama.

    CNN doesn't impress me as a news source and my impression was that this item was another bit of fluff. However maybe it had a negative impact whether or not that was the intention.
  • Ree Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Ree
    #6
    To me CNN is hit and miss, I really thought they were at the top of their game, when Bhutto was assassinated. They ran a week of specials on Pakistan and Afghanistan minus the political idealogical bias.

    That being stated CNN = Clinton News Network.
  • avatar Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
    #7
    While this is really disgusting, I think you could find this sort of thing being played out against any one of the candidates on the MSM affiliate of their choice. The biases are becoming so transparent as to be laughable.

    When you noted the constant "mistakes" in using Osama in place of Obama I had a flashback of the scene where Obama's supporters all stood in a room chanting his name over and over again "OBAMA, OBAMA" and the first thing that it triggered in my mind is they could just as well be chanting Osama, Osama. I don't think they did him any favors in doing that.....

    If his grandmother is truly this dirt poor woman shucking corn, don't you find that sort of, well, disheartening? The man lives quite comfortably in a very expensive home in a very expensive area and yet his grandmother sits in the dirt in mismatched clothing? Sure hope my grandson would be better to me than that if he were to become rich, successful and powerful.Are we to come to the conclusion that he had cut ties with her for some reason?

    Each candidate is being drug through the mud for any number of reasons. I personally can't understand the fortitude of the people that decide to run for public office in this country anymore. I sure couldn't do it. To open yourself up to such intense scrutiny, well - no thanks.

    I wonder if there is ANYONE left on this planet that hasn't got a closet brimming with skeletons?
  • Ree Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Ree
    #8
    MSNBC appears to be for Clinton and Fox News wants Romney, now that could be incorrect but that is the perception and at some point Perception can shape Reality.

    Obama is on his own he has to hack out his own media attention. He has been doing very well, unfortunately he is now in the sights of the Clinton Political Machine.
  • Ree Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Ree
    #9
  • avatar Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Bocephalus
    #10
    Excellent article Hargrove.

    CNN has definitely lost some credibility in recent years, by hiring freaks like Glenn Beck and that other wench Nancy Grace. Your examples show how it's heading in the direction of faux news.

    As for Kyra Phillips, she has repeatedly demonstrated her bias and lack of any journalistic objectivity and professionalism.

    CNN is behaving like state-owned media.

    The race card will become more prevalent , you just watch, as the elections drive on. American will have to see if it is ready for a black president or not and it will get ugly.
  • Hargrove Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Hargrove
    #11
    Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)

    Obama's supporters all stood in a room chanting his name over and over again "OBAMA, OBAMA" the first thing that it triggered in my mind is they could just as well be chanting Osama, Osama.


    That's what their "mistakes" are designed to create. When you have that thought, you might feel a slight discomfort. Then a few weeks later you're thinking, "I guess I'll go with Hillary after all . . ."

    Most of us don't even think about Osama bin Laden these days. As a matter of fact, the only time I've heard his name lately (before the campaign), is when Barack's enemies are making "mistakes."

    As for whether Barack should do something about his grandmother's lifestyle, remember, her son did not support Barack. He left when Barack was 2 and he visited for a short time when he was 12. Also, his grandmother's lifestyle is a life time of living a particular way. She's a peasant! I'm sure she loves her life. She looks like a happy person. He probably sends her packages because money wouldn't do her much good since she's too far from commerce to spend it.

    He met his grandmother for the first time when he was 19. I thought it was too his credit that he could go into such a foreign culture and, according to his grandmother, join with her to do all of the tasks she did on the farm. There are not too many westerners, raised by whites, who could go to Africa and behave like that. By the way, I saw something reminiscent of Barack's thoughtful intelligence, in her face, when she spoke of appreciating him because of his character.

    I'm sure Barack gives them something, but he absolutely owes them nothing.
  • Hargrove Posted Jan 9, 2008 by  Hargrove
    #12
    Ree,

    I'm even questioning if the Clintons are conspiring with CNN because on the same day that Bill is calling Barack's reputation "the biggest fairly tale I've ever seen," CNN's saying the idea of his presidency is "as far-fetched as any piece of fiction." Interesting parrallel in the choice of words.

    Also, the Clinton's confessed to planting people at one of the debates, to ask Hillary prearranged questions. In New Hampshire, it was a question that brought her to tears and made her more likeable . . . Was it just luck that the question was recorded by the cameras and her response was played over and over again . . . Also people showed up at Barack's rally to heckle him. His was bad heckling because it highlighted his pro-abortion stance and it kept him from speaking. By contrast, her heckler told her to iron their shirts, triggering female sympathy and loyalty . . . Could all of this, the race put downs, and the sympathetic gender events, be contrived . . .
  • Ree Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Ree
    #13
    Hargrove,

    I was watching Imus, after the New Hampshire results came in, he kept repeating something to the guest, he was discussing the results with. He stated does Obama know that the Clintons will do absolutely whatever it takes to win? The on going example given on Imus in the Morning, if it is a hockey game and the puck goes into the corner, the Clintons are going to come out with the puck. Mike Lupica wrote a great peice on this, he used a quote from Mike Tyson, he stated, everyone has a plan until they get hit. Obama got hit!

    I read on yahoo news that Kucinich asked for a recount a hand count, and that New Hampshire is going to recount the votes, this has not happened since 1980 in NH...something hinky going on up in New Hampshire?
  • Ree Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Ree
    #14
    Hargrove,

    Here is the article I was referring to by Mike Lupica last Thursday. Mike Lupica a friend and frequent guest on Imus in the Morning.

    http://www.theworldpress.com/presse/pressemonde/presseusa/nydaynews.htm
  • avatar Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #15
    I am rather tired that obama is getting attention because of his race. He should be getting attention because of his platform , which I happen to disagree with. If he doesn't win I doubt it is evidence that America isn't ready for a "black president," just like if Hilary doesn't win it isn't evidence that America isn't ready for a "woman president." I am rather frustrated that people label this like we as a nation are racist or sexist simply because we do not pick a president on that "virtue" alone. If you can't present a whole package or intend to specifically represent only a portion of your constituents based on race or sex there is something wrong and you will not receive votes. As far as I can tell Obama and Hilary don't fall under that stigma, they simply are running into fundamental disagreements with the more conservative base of America because of where they want to lead the government. Simple as that.
  • avatar Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #16
    @ Samantha A. Torrence
    I am rather tired that obama is getting attention because of his race. He should be getting attention because of his platform , which I happen to disagree with. If he doesn't win I doubt it is evidence that America isn't ready for a "black president," just like if Hilary doesn't win it isn't evidence that America isn't ready for a "woman president." I am rather frustrated that people label this like we as a nation are racist or sexist simply because we do not pick a president on that "virtue" alone. If you can't present a whole package or intend to specifically represent only a portion of your constituents based on race or sex there is something wrong and you will not receive votes. As far as I can tell Obama and Hilary don't fall under that stigma, they simply are running into fundamental disagreements with the more conservative base of America because of where they want to lead the government. Simple as that.


    Couldn't have said it better myself!
  • Ree Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Ree
    #17
    Bill Clinton called Obama's position on Iraq War vote or lack of it a fairy tale, why because his wife is on the record although she has tried to nuance her vote. This is the primarys, this isn't Republican vs Democrat, this is Democrat vs Democrat, and both could use "cards" gender and ethnicity. Obama and Clinton can't go after each other for percieved bias gender or ethnicity because they will alienate parts of their base. Then what is left for them to use against each other in the Democrat Primary. The Clintons appear to have the MSM edge as CNN shows bias towards Senator Clinton. CBS'S Katie Couric looks to be pro Clinton whether this is true or not it is the preception.

    I really don't think the Republicans care which one they run against in the National Election.
  • Hargrove Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Hargrove
    #18
    Ree,

    I think the Republicans do care who wins! You know that Karl Rove is the godfather of the Republican party. When he thought that Hillary was the one to beat, he published an "open letter" to Barack, telling him to weaken her (for them) by using the sexist tactics of demeaning women, ""find a way to gently belittle her . . ."

    But when he saw what a formidable foe Obama became, he personally whipped out the race card, using the racial triggers of not qualified, lazy, dishonest, not very bright . . .

    Mr. Obama has failed to rise to leadership on a single major issue in the Senate. In the Illinois legislature, he had a habit of ducking major issues, voting “present” on bills important to many Democratic interest groups, like abortion-rights and gun-control advocates. He is often lazy, given to misstatements and exaggerations and, when he doesn’t know the answer, too ready to try to bluff his way through.

    Karl Rove wants Hillary to win!
  • Hargrove Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Hargrove
    #19
    Samantha and Debra,

    There is a covert reality in the unconscious minds of Americans, black and white, that is tempered by race and sex. The reason we don't get over it is because we're not aware of it. I believe, to my great excitement, that this presidential race is going to bring it to the fore. I think the country is ready for a black or female president, but the manipulators of racism and sexism are trying their best to make sure that, if it happens, it will happen according to their will . . .
  • avatar Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #20
    @ Hargrove
    Samantha and Debra,

    There is a covert reality in the unconscious minds of Americans, black and white, that is tempered by race and sex. The reason we don't get over it is because we're not aware of it. I believe, to my great excitement, that this presidential race is going to bring it to the fore. I think the country is ready for a black or female president, but the manipulators of racism and sexism are trying their best to make sure that, if it happens, it will happen according to their will . . .


    I think that you are right, Hargrove!
  • avatar Posted Jan 13, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #21
    Hargrove, I am sure some people are still influenced by that but most are not.

    If Condi were running I would vote for her, but I won't vote for Barack or Hillary. I think racism and sexism are more often carried out by the cries of people who perceive injustice where there may not be any. I am sure that isn't all the cases but the vast majority of people simply want a person at the helm who is for the people and it doesn't matter what shell houses the mind and spirit of the person who can be for the people.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?