The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageWinning Design Of January's Green Gadgets Conference Has Been Recalled

Posted Mar 5, 2008 by  Angelique van Engelen in Environment | 1 comment | 336 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
The winning design of January’s Greener Gadget’s Conference’s Design Competition has been declared as not feasible by scientists. The design, the weight powered LED floorlamp by Clay Moulton, has been recalled by its inventor.
Moulton recently wrote a letter in which he declared that he’s going to have to do some more work on the lamp. The lamp was designed as part of a master’s thesis at the Virginia Tech university (see previous coverage here).

In reply to a highly critical article on PES Network Moulton wrote that “If there’s any question as to the legitimacy of the competition now, I have offered to graciously concede the 2nd place win, as well as any winnings. My job now is to figure out a better design, plain and simple. I made an estimation based on feedback I got during the design process, and that estimation was shown to be incorrect.”

The debate that followed had been raging on for a while and finally last week, the organisers, InHabitat.com responded. On their website, they pledged continued support to Moulton; “We were surprised over all the commotion on the engineering feasibility of the lamp, since this was a conceptual design competition after all, and we never stated that designs had to be manufacturable or in production”, they wrote. They underline that the whole point of the design competition was to envision the future of greener gadgets. “We believe that Gravia is an amazing concept with a lot of potential, despite the design’s lack of accurate engineering specifications.”

Too bad that instead of directly dealing with the criticisms, the organisers simply opened the discussion; you can comment on the issue. If they had taken apart the criticisms they would have surely lent the competition the credibility it obviously lacks.

bio: Angelique van Engelen writes AmplifiedGreen, a blog about micro green issues, macro perspectives.
article:247882:9::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?