article imageCanadians In Port Hope Test Positive For Radioactivity

By KJ Mullins.
Subscribe to author
Nov 13, 2007 by  KJ Mullins - 6 votes, 6 comments
Share
Listen - Email - Print
Recipient email:
You can enter up to 10 comma-separated email addresses.
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

With a welcoming sing that states "The Town That Radiates Friendliness" lays a little town called Port Hope about 100 KM east of Toronto. The town was paramount in early radiation testing, now it's in danger because of that.
The town now needs just that, hope to survive the radioactive contamination that has been blowing around town for more than 70 years.
When a small group of participants donated urine samples for the Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee the samples were found to have radioactive substances.
The substances were not only in those who worked at the local nuclear facilities but average citizens as well. It seems some of those tested had high levels of radioactive isotopes in their bodies but how? Could the soil that the government said was safe not as harmless as reported?
Some of those tested had worked in the plants but they haven't had any direct exposure for decades so how are the levels still so high in their bodies today? Is it possible that the radiation levels of today have been the same as when they were originally exposed?
As the Toronto Star reports:
"People of Port Hope have been continuously and chronically subjected to inhalation of radioactive dust, including depleted uranium and different levels of enrichment of uranium isotopes," Dr. Asaf Durakovic told reporters at a news conference on Tuesday.
With those results the health committee called in a research group, the Uranium Medical Research Centre, to look into the matter.
For about 70 years the citizens of Port Hope have been exposed to radioactivity. The source is man-made ceramized, insoluble uranium and during the past 70 years the federal government has not once tested the residents to see if there was only problems. The only reason the testing was done in the first place was residents took matters into their own hands. They could only afford the expensive testing on nine residents.
The town has a population of 16,000 people. It's also home to Cameco uranium refinery and the Eldorado radium plant. The Eldorado plant was active in the 1930's until 1960 when the mine was exhausted.
In it's beings Eldorado extracted radium from pitchblende. The radium was used in cancer treatments. the product was very valuable selling at US$70,000 per gram. The ore from Eldorado was used in the first chain reaction experiments. Uranium ore from the mine was used in atomic bomb development in 1945.
The soil has been in the process of North America's largest clean up since 2001 when the government committed to removing 3.5 million cubic meters of contaminated soil. The soil contains radium and uranium, as well as arsenic, radon and lead. So why did the people themselves have to test part of the population to see if there were any problems? The government should have wanted to make sure that the residents were safe.
The soil contamination took place before radiation was viewed as a severe threat to human and animal life. For that reason it was deemed low-level historic waste.
Glenn Case
of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Office said that earlier studies found no need to test the residents of the town. He cited a 1994 study that looked at the potential for ground and surface water contamination and the chances of that exposing humans and found there were no "short-term health risks" and that the radiation levels were within acceptable standards. The thing is if the standards were so acceptable why is 3.5 million cubic meters of soil needing to be removed? And while possible short term health risks are low what about the long term ones?
Right now there are far more questions than answers for the residents of Port Hope. At some point soon the residents deserve some logical and honest answers. They walked for 70 years on the dust of contaminated soil thinking it was safe. Was it? Now it's time for the experts to come and let the residents know what to expect and if the government needs to act on that. Time is not to be wasted for the people's answers.
article:246151:6::0

Facebook Photos Cost Canadian Woman Sickness Benefits

A 29-year-old Canadian woman is taking an insurance company to court, claiming that they ended the benefits they had been paying her for over a year and a half because of photos posted on her Facebook page.
Nov 22, 2009 by  Chris Dade in Lifestyle - 2 comments

Obama will make Afghan decision after Thanksgiving Special

United States President Barack Obama will hold off any final decision to add tens of thousands of troops to Afghanistan until after the Thanksgiving holiday is over.
Nov 22, 2009 by  Andrew Moran in Politics - 1 comment

Canadian-owned uranium mine 'blasted' by US green groups

Toronto-based Denison Mines has been generating controversy in the United States for its attempts to revive shelved uranium mines that are in an area just north of the Grand Canyon in Arizona.
Nov 22, 2009 by  Stephanie Dearing in Environment - 1 comment

Live like a rodent at the French 'hamster hotel'

If you've ever had the urge to spend a night or two as a hamster, you need to visit Nantes, France. For around $150 a night, you can do everything a hamster does, from spinning on a wheel to eating the animal's food to sleeping on a pile of hay.
Nov 21, 2009 by  David Silverberg in Travel - 2 comments

Easyjet apologizes for Holocaust Memorial photo shoot

Easyjet is a European regional carrier that has quickly carved out market share with discount prices and targeted marketing. However, a recent public relations faux pas is causing controversy.
Nov 21, 2009 by  Bob Gordon in Travel - 6 comments
apis-129953 apis-129955 apis-129949 apis-129892 apis-129889
Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?