The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageBiofuels 'crime against humanity'

Posted Oct 27, 2007 by  Chris V. (cgull) in Environment | 2 comments | 150 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
UN is worried about the growing trend of using crops to produce biofuels as a replacement for petrol and believe this will lead to severe food shortages for the poor and cause more hunger.
Jean Ziegler, the UN special reporter on the right to food, has condemned the wide use of crops as biofuels and says it will lead to widespread hunger if not curtailed or controlled.

The growth in the production of biofuels has helped the prices of some crops to record levels and those who want to use it for food purposes will find it hard to purchase them and will cause severe hunger.

Ziegler complained because of biofuels needs others are converting many other food crops like maize and sugar into fuel. He said this has created a recipe for disaster. He said it is a crime against humanity to divert arable land to the production of crops and then burned for fuel.

Ziegler wants a five year ban on this biofuels practice. He said during that period, more research or technical advances can be made to use agricultural wastes such as corn cobs, banana leaves etc., rather than crops themselves to produce fuel.

Biofuels may be less environmentally damaging alternative to petroleum but will seriously affect the poor and in the future others also with shortages of food crops.

In the US, the biofuels trend has already contributed to a sharp rise in food prices as farmers are converting from wheat, soya to corn, which is then turned to ethanol. Corn is easy to produce and manage, and with the high prices for biofuels use, the farmers will tend to produce more of it.

But the trend has contributed to a sharp rise in food prices as farmers, particularly in the US, switch production from wheat and soya to corn, which is then turned into ethanol.

The IMF also last week voiced concern that the increasing global reliance on grain as a source of fuel could have serious implications for the world's poor.

I agree with Ziegler, with growing population, the arable land is shrinking in size with many of them converting to homes and offices. With the limited lands, we need every ounce of them for food cultivation instead if people start to use it for biofuels, then the food supplies will lead to severe shortages. They should rely more on Solar and Wind power, one can't solve a problem with another problem, biofuels in this case.
article:243286:2::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Oct 28, 2007 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #1
    It's sad that we've come to a time that we have to worry about using what land that is plantable for foods or for use in biofuels and having to decide which is more important.
  • avatar Posted Oct 28, 2007 by  lensman67
    #2
    I thought we already did this story yesterday. Anyway I will say here what I said there:

    What part of Malthus didn't this person (who wrote the report) understand? The population is already far beyond the level that the planet can sustain and by supplying food to sustain unsustainable populations we are merely compounding the problem.

    According to another report, also by the UN

    Humans are completely living beyond their ecological means, says a major report published by the UN Environment Programme on Thursday.

    It takes more than just food to sustain a population and in every other resource besides food the planet is vastly overpopulated right now. By allowing populations that can not currently feed themselves to continue to reproduce far beyond their ability to feed themselves we are insuring that when, not if, the collapse comes it will be an even greater disaster than it would have been.

    The 550-page document finds the human ecological footprint is on average 21.9 hectares per person. Given the global population, however, the Earth's biological capacity is just 15.7 hectares per person.

    The report is UNEP's latest on the state of the planet's health, taking five years in the making. It was put together by about 390 experts and peer-reviewed by an additional 1000.

    A major cause of fuel wastage and ecological damage is the habit of transporting food over long distances. Why should people feel that they have the right to eat fruits and vegetables out of season or in climates that will not sustain such foods? How many people are being starved so that Americans or Canadians can have salad in the winter or bananas all year round? Vegetarians, for example, cannot eat a healthy diet without importing foods from other climates, at a great cost in fuel.

    If people are concerned about the environment and about sustainable populations then a return to local, sustainable farms, and to eating the food of the country rather than imported luxuries is more useful than reducing the production of bio-fuels.

    For links and references see the other story.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?