| Internet Post News ($)     Upload Images»
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» Help Center» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»

article imageWeb 2.0 Hype or Democracy in Action: Conference Debate

Published Sep 5, 2007, by Bob Ewing
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Listen
Email Print
Subscribe to author
Save as mp3 | Speech-enabled by ReadSpeaker
Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

Web 2.0 Hype or Democracy in Action: Conference Debate

by Bob Ewing.
A social science conference is taking a look at Web 2.0 from a social sciences perspective. Has the interactive and open nature helped or hindered the flow of information? Opposing voices will be heard.
The debate begins today. The Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0 Conference open and runs until tomorrow. the conference's focus is the developments in the Internet that have taken place over the past few years.

The various web developments have received considerable media attention but, to date, have not been given any serious look by the social sciences.

The purpose of the conference is to begin the process of investigation by social scientists into what is now known as Web 2.0. In particular, the participants will examine the social practices of ‘generating’ and ‘browsing’, ‘tagging’ and ‘feeds’, ‘commenting’ and ‘noting’,‘reviewing’ and ‘rating’, ‘blogging’, ‘mashing-up’ and making ‘friends’

Two of the conference's speakers who taken dramatically opposing views are sure to draw much attention.

Internet entrepreneur turned cultural critic Andrew Keen, who says the revolution of interactivity and user-generated content on the Internet is leading to ‘less culture, less reliable news and a chaos of useless information’ is one of the two.

The other is Charles Leadbeater who argues that the more sources of information available, the more critical people can be.
article:224247:5::0

Comments »

Share on
del.icio.us digg facebook newsvine reddit stumbleupon technorati
Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?