We've all seen the pictures. Back in the 90's we were bombarded with images of men, withered and frail, IV tubes attached to their arms - dying. Today those images are frequently of the victims in Africa, men, women and children, their bones jutting from their bodies like knives, lying prone, flies picking at their flesh - dying, of AIDS.
The ad campaigns splash across our television screens multiple times throughout the day. HIV- the virus that causes AIDS. Get Tested Now. We are told that everyone is at risk. This is a sexually transmitted disease. A virus, that unlike any other virus known to mankind, can infect it's victim and lie dormant for what was originally said to be months, then 2 years, then 5 years, then 10 years, now - a lifetime. If you test positive for HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus) then you are told you will eventually fall victim to AIDS. (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome).
Many states are currently discussing making the HIV Test mandatory. Thousands of people worldwide are being reported as HIV positive. A virtual death sentence is being handed out hundreds of times every day to men, women and children just like you and me.
But, is the presence of the HIV retrovirus really the proven cause of AIDS? If you are HIV positive, should you immediately seek medical treatment - a treatment that consists of various pharmaceutical cocktails, that are said to slow the development of the virus in your system? If you have virtually no symptoms whatsoever, are not sick, should you begin a drug regimen?
There is a groundswell of physicians, scientists and biochemists that are trying to take a stand against the Federal Government and the "powers that be", indicating that we are on the wrong track, a fast moving train that leads to nowhere. We are chasing the wrong cause and killing thousands because of it.
The AIDS epidemic first came to light in 1981. 5 gay men, living in Los Angeles, were diagnosed with an illness referred to as Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome - AIDS. They suffered from a number of various illnesses, all of which were attributed to the fact that their immune systems had virtually shut down. Their bodies were no longer able to produce enough antibodies, i.e. T Cells, to fight off infection.
These men lived in the "fast lane" in regard to their sexual practices. They, and those like them, indicated that they would have as many as 200 different sexual partners in a 12 month period. Most were chronic antibiotic users, as they were treated numerous times for various STD's including gonorrhea, syphilis, chlamydia and anal warts. They were also habitual drug users. The number one drug of choice being amylbutal nitrates - or "poppers" as it is called on the street.
What no one told the public at that time is that the very drugs these men were ingesting on a regular basis, the antibiotics and street drugs, were actually clinically proven to suppress the immune system. Was it possible that it was the drug use that was killing these men, and not their sexual activity?
The next group to be added to the list of "high risk" persons - IV drug users. Again, people whose lifestyles involved a huge consumption of medication and street drugs.
The public was clamoring for help. What is this deadly illness, and how do you get it? What do we do to keep safe? Gays were considered pariah. Could you get it if they touched you, kissed you, bled on you?
The government was frantic. Scientists and biochemists, previously out of work, due to the loss of government funded research to find the suspected virus that caused cancer, were summoned back to the laboratories. AIDS was the new "illness du jour". The government began funneling millions of dollars into research. Find a cure.
On April 23, 1984, Gallo called an international press conference in conjunction with the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). He used this forum to announce his discovery of a new retrovirus described as "the probable cause of AIDS." Although Gallo presented no evidence to support his tentative assumption, the HHS immediately characterized it as "another miracle of American medicine...the triumph of science over a dreaded disease."
The media rushed to get this miraculous news into the mainstream. A cause had been found - the HIV virus. Could a cure not be far behind?
What the media failed to report is that Dr. Gallo, in his rush to the podium, had violated a fundamental rule of science.
Researchers must first publish evidence for a hypothesis in a medical or scientific journal, and document the research or experiments that were used to construct it. Experts then examine and debate the hypothesis, and attempt to duplicate the original experiments to confirm or refute the original findings. Any new hypothesis must stand up to the scrutiny of peer review and must be verified by successful experiments before it can be considered a reasonable theory.
Gallo had done no such thing, but had instead reported his
hypothesis as proven scientific fact, and that was that.
"The
data Gallo used to construct his HIV/AIDS hypothesis were published several days after his announcement. Rather than supporting his hypothesis, this paper revealed that Gallo was unable to find HIV (actual virus) in more than half of the AIDS patients in his study. (18) While he was able to detect antibodies in most, antibodies alone are not an indication of current infection and are actually an indication of immunity from infection.
His paper also failed to provide a credible explanation as to how a retrovirus could cause AIDS. Gallo suggested that HIV worked by destroying immune cells, but 70 years of medical research had shown that retroviruses are unable to kill cells, and he offered no proof that HIV differed from other harmless retroviruses. In fact, all evidence to date conclusively demonstrates that HIV -- like all retroviruses -- is not
cytotoxic. (
producing a toxic effect on cells.)"
This information, however, did not stop the government and it's army of scientists and researchers from forging ahead. No longer looking in any other direction, they proceeded to work on the development of drugs to destroy the HIV virus.
But, was this not turning science upside down? We all carry retroviruses. They are essentially a part of our own, naturally formed immune system. There are an average of 50-100 retroviruses in every human being. Absolutely none of these viruses has ever been shown to cause disease. Retroviruses are actually formed when a virus attacks our system, they are our "first line of defense" if you will, and make us well. At least that is how it has worked forever, until the report given to the media by Dr. Gallo indicating that suddenly, the retrovirus HIV was causing illness, not curing it.
The US government, following Dr. Gallo's miraculous announcement, also was quick to file the patent on Gallo's "HIV Test Kit" which nets over $100,000 million per year in profits to the US.
The test itself carries with it an insert that indicates that there is no scientific evidence proving that the existence of HIV in your blood proves you will get AIDS. The consumer, however, never sees that insert. They just accept a positive result as the death sentence we've all been told it is.
Following the announcement of Gallo's discovery, a massive public relations campaign ensued. It had further been realized, following extensive research, that we were all at risk of developing AIDS. Suddenly, people all over the country were turning up positive on their HIV tests. The virus was apparently spreading like wildfire across the world. Heterosexual AIDS led to massive funding, both from the government and private donors.
What they don't tell you is that there are 70 pre-existing conditions that can give a false positive with the test. Pregnancy is one. If you have ever had herpes - i.e. a cold sore, risk of false positive. One group did an experiment, sending the same blood sample to 19 different labs, and they received different results in each case. One half negative, one half positive.
There are two tests currently used. Neither of which has ever been FDA approved. The
Elisa Test and the
Western Block Test. These are interpreted in different ways depending on the country, and even state, you reside in. You can be positive in Florida, but considered negative in Michigan. To be positive in Africa, you need only 2 lines indicated on the Western Block, but in the US you would require 6 lines reading positive for the same diagnosis.
A
report was published on the Internet by a man working in a lab running these tests. He indicated that, when conducting the tests as mandated, i.e. diluting the serum down 400x, which was highly unusual, the results varied. But when he conducted the tests without diluting the serum, as is standard in any other testing for retroviruses - every single test came back positive. It is his hypothesis that we all carry the HIV retrovirus. We would all test positive.
I first took samples of blood that, at 1:400 dilution, tested negative for antibodies to HIV. I then ran the exact same serum samples through the test again, but this time without diluting them. Tested straight, they all came positive.
Since that time I have run about 100 specimens and have always gotten the same result. I even ran my own blood which, at 1:400 reacts negative. At 1:1 [undiluted] it reacted positive. I should mention that with the exception of my own blood, the patient samples all came from doctors who requested HIV tests. It is therefore likely that most of the blood samples that I tested belonged to individuals at risk for AIDS.
Renowned Molecular and Cellular Biologist
Peter Duesberg, a PHD professor has come out in strong opposition against Gallo's theories, and indicates that we are on the wrong track in the fight against AIDS.
He claims there is no virological, nor epidemiological, evidence to back-up the HIV-AIDS hypothesis. Instead, the virus is biochemically inactive and harmless, and AIDS is not behaving as a contagious disease, he says.
Instead of the government listening to this man, the same man that worked for them and made incredible discoveries in cancer research, they have shut down all his funding, closed his laboratories and essentially made every effort possible to silence him.
Over 100,000 reports have been filed since Dr. Gallo made his announcement in 1984. Not a single one draws a definitive correlation between the existence of HIV in one's blood, and the subsequent result of acquiring of AIDS.
Currently there are a over 30 different diseases that fall under the "AIDS" umbrella. If one has pneumonia and HIV in their blood - they have AIDS. If pneumonia and no HIV - well, that is just pneumonia. So it goes for every illness on the list. Sick with positive HIV - AIDS. No HIV - merely sick.
In Africa, the number one cause of death is now reported to be AIDS. Before HIV testing, it was dysentery, i.e. diarrhea. With the advent of AIDS however, millions of dollars are pouring in towards the development of new and better drugs to treat the AIDS victims. Diarrhea just doesn't sell as well.
And, what about those drugs? When AIDS first hit, and the public was clamoring for a cure. The first drug released for treatment was AZT. Initially created in the late 1960's as a chemotherapy treatment, it was shelved due to test results showing a high level of toxicity. Is was deemed unfit for human consumption. But, apparently all of that went to the wayside, and AZT was the new "miracle cure", and handed out like candy to the HIV positives in the 80's, and is still used today. Those pictures of those wasting, frail men? AZT users. The side effects of the list of current HIV/AIDS medications,
25 and counting, read like a horror novel.
Lactic acidosis, which can be fatal, and severe liver problems (fatty liver) have been reported in people taking NRTIs. Studies have demonstrated that Zerit is more likely than other NRTIs to cause lactic acidosis, though it is still considered to be a rare side effect. The risk of lactic acidosis increases if Zerit is taken in combination with Videx®/Videx EC® (ddI), another NRTI, or in combination with ribavirin (Rebetol®; Copegus®), an antiviral drug commonly used to treat hepatitis C. Contact your doctor immediately if you experience nausea, vomiting, or unusual or unexpected stomach discomfort; weakness and tiredness; shortness of breath; weakness in the arms and legs; yellowing of the skin or eyes; or pain in the upper stomach area.
Fatal and nonfatal pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas) has occurred with Zerit when taken in combination with Videx and other HIV drugs. Symptoms of pancreatitis include stomach pain, nausea, or vomiting. If you notice these symptoms, stop taking Zerit, and call your doctor right away.
A common side effect of Zerit is peripheral neuropathy, which can result in pain, tingling, numbness, or burning in the hands and/or feet. Stopping Zerit and starting another nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) that does not usually cause peripheral neuropathy – for example, Retrovir® (AZT) or Ziagen® (abacavir) – is often the best way to stop peripheral neuropathy.
Less common side effects include allergic reactions, loss of appetite, bone pain (arthralgia), stomach upset, headache, problems sleeping, muscle pain (myalgia), diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anemia, and pancreatitis. These side effects improve within a few months/weeks of starting Zerit.
There has been some concern that Zerit might cause, or at least contribute to, changes in body fat (lipodystrophy), most notably a loss of fat in the arms, legs, and face (lipoatrophy). A number of studies have demonstrated that Zerit is more likely to cause this problem than other NRTIs, particularly when it is used in combination with a protease inhibitor (protease inhibitors are also believed to cause changes in body fat). If you notice that the layer of fat beneath your skin in your arms, legs, or face appears to be becoming thinner – sunken cheeks and veiny arms and legs are common symptoms – you should discuss this with your doctor. If you and your doctor suspect that Zerit might be to blame, one option might be to stop therapy with Zerit and switch to another nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI).
What is the number one cause of death reported in the US for AIDS patients? Liver failure. That's right. HIV/AIDS victims are dying alright. But are they dying from diseases, or the destruction of their liver, ones most vital organ, as a result of consuming these poisonous drugs. The same drugs the 120 billion dollars being spent each year to fight the "AIDS" epidemic are working so diligently to provide to the victims here in the US and worldwide.
Gilead Sciences Inc, a drug manufacturer, was recently reported to be a Wall Street darling in July of this year. Why?
According to Barron's, Gilead had turned into one of the world's top pharmaceutical companies leading the fight against HIV and AIDS, with four of its HIV drugs getting the credit for much of the company's recent earnings and stock gains. Gilead's four HIV medications accounted for $705 million of the company's sales during its first fiscal quarter, or about 70% of total quarterly sales, according to Barron's.
So, why aren't we hearing any of this?
Let's be honest. HIV/AIDS is Big Business. The research, PR Campaigns, Scientists, Biologists, Drug Manufacturers and Spokespersons are making big money. Riding on the back of "The Beast" that is HIVAIDS, millions of people are raking in millions of dollars in profits.
There are thousands of people alive and well today that were diagnosed as HIV positive over 20 years ago. They are married, have children, careers, lives that are successful and healthy. They chose not to give into the fear of death. The fear that overwhelms and destroys most.
Fear is an awesome motivator. Fear of death is even greater still.
With all of the evidence indicating that HIV in your bloodstream does not, in fact, dictate that you will every become ill with AIDS, should you succumb to the "prescribed protocol" doctors are pushing on the unfortunate victims? Namely, a list of medications that one can barely pronounce, and are proving time and time again to be doing more harm then good?
Isn't it time we all took another look at just what is going on here?
The Group For Reappraisal - a conglomerate of doctors, scientists, physicists, biochemists and other medical professionals are calling for a reassessment. With over 2300 signatures to date, they are asking the government to resume testing and search for another potential cause, as all studies indicate HIV is not the answer.
They are forming a strongly united group. United because they all share the scientifically based opinion according to which: a) AIDS is not an infectious disease; b) AIDS is not caused by a retrovirus; c) serological and viral load tests are not reliable for the diagnosis of AIDS; d) HAART drugs do more harm than good; e) adequate public hygiene and sanitation, well balanced nutrition, and curtailing the use of recreational drugs can prevent and control AIDS much better than all the toxic ARV therapeutic regimens; and f) several alternative and non-viral factors can explain the occurrence of most acquired immuno deficiencies in humans. This is a lot to agree about!
Where do you stand? Have you ever heard any of this information before? I hadn't. Proponents of this push for further research, namely the heads of departments such as the CDC and the US Department of Health shun the very concept. They indicate that spreading this "rumour" will cause the public to fail to get tested, stop using condoms and further perpetuate this epidemic.
After 23 years of continuous, ongoing research, no cure has been found for HIV/AIDS. Doesn't that say something right there?
After viewing the numerous 2 hour videos, studying and researching the information shared, and questioning the logic of what were are being told, I am shocked and dismayed by what appears to be the largest fraud every perpetrated on the world at large.
HIV/AIDS - Epidemic or "Scamdemic" - You tell me.
