 |
Humans Evolved to Walk on Two Legs Simply Because It's More Efficient
Anything that involves monkeys, juice boxes and treadmills is a must-read and this is no exception: A new study suggests human ancestors evolved to walk upright rather than "knuckle-dragging" because it requires 75 per cent less energy.
Digital Journal — One of the most contentious issues in evolutionary debate, is answering the question as to why early human ancestors evolved to walk on two legs rather than dragging their knuckles like chimpanzees and gorillas.
In an attempt to study the benefits of walking upright, a team of scientists from Washington University in St. Louis put a chimp on a treadmill (rewarding it with sweet treats and juice boxes of course) and studied how much energy adult chimps used compared to humans while walking.
As it turns out, it seems humans might have evolved to walk upright simply because it more efficient, using less energy to move around to find food.
Collecting metabolic and biomechanical data from four humans and five chimps, researchers learned humans use 75 per cent less energy than chimps by walking upright compared with chimps who walk on all fours.
Published in this week's online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Herman Pontzer (a researcher with the university's department of anthropology) said the study suggests human ancestors began walking upright because it burns fewer calories. The result of being able to walk upright, and thus using less energy, meant human ancestors required less food.
David Raichlen, an anthropology professor at the University of Arizona, told The Independent: For decades researchers have debated the role of energetics and the evolution of bipedalism. The big problem in the study of bipedalism was that there was little data out there. During the experiment, both humans and chimps had to wear a mask to measure how much oxygen was used, and Pontzer said the chimps were not happy about it. Scientists also measured the force exerted by walking on the treadmill, allowing them to calculate muscle power used.
Dave Raichlen of the department of anthropology at the University of Arizona in Tucson, told the Globe and Mail the chimps were brilliant during testing, going so far as to hit the big red "stop" button when they wanted to stop the walk on the treadmill. However researchers say it was a long process to teach chimps to cooperate, saying they weigh as much as a human but are five times stronger (thus, if they don't want to cooperate there is not much researchers could do about it). Raichlen admits the juice boxes were key to having the chimps stay on the treadmill for at least three minutes.
When observing the humans, scientists found a notable difference between individuals but a solid advantage in bipedalism.
They also learned that chimps walking on two legs, or all fours, used the same amount of energy. But with chimps who took longer strides while on two feet, they were more efficient than those who took short strides.
In the same interview with the Independent, Raichlen said: We were able to tie the energetic cost in chimps to their anatomy. We were able to show exactly why certain individuals were able to walk bipedally more cheaply than others, and we did that with biomechanical modelling. What those results allowed us to do was to look at the fossil record and see whether fossil hominins [ancestors] show adaptations that would have reduced bipedal energy expenditure. This process showed some early humans developed longer legs than others, indicating that "energetics played a pretty large role in the evolution of bipedalism."
-
This seems like a reasonable explanation, there was an advantage to be gained and evolution followed that path.
-
Sorry Chris I believe the evolution theory is a bunch of crap.
But for those who think your ancestors were monkeys go ahead and think it.
-
@ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
Sorry Chris I believe the evolution theory is a bunch of crap.
But for those who think your ancestors were monkeys go ahead and think it.
So the world is only about 6,000 years old and was made in 6 days? Interesting! And all the mountains of evidence is what? God playing jokes?
You might enjoy Spencer Tracy and Gene Kelly in "Inherit the Wind."
-
I think it is great lensman that we can all believe the way we want to and no one, at least yet, can come and lock anyone up for what they believe.
-
@ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
I think it is great lensman that we can all believe the way we want to and no one, at least yet, can come and lock anyone up for what they believe.
I agree. It is great that the Inquisition, the Witch Hunts, the wars of religion and the hangings or burning at the stake of atheists is no longer permitted.
-
Chris, way back in the day in school we learned that humans walked upright because it helped keep the body cooler as well. When the hot sun is beating down on you, only having your head as compared to your back shoulders neck and head was much less to deal with.
-
@ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
Sorry Chris I believe the evolution theory is a bunch of crap.
But for those who think your ancestors were monkeys go ahead and think it.
Wow, that is quite the statement.
Well, I guess I'm one of the ones who believes that I come from a monkey, I don't know what that makes me but I just can't see any other rational explanation for it.
As far as this theory goes, surely there is something that these truly brilliant researchers and scientists could put their minds to other than trying to find out why, all those millions of years ago, we decided to get up off our four legs and walk on two? Honestly, does this really matter?
Grumble, grumble, I don't know whats come over me today ... I must be having an Amarant PMS day!
-
@ Samantha A. Torrence
Chris, way back in the day in school we learned that humans walked upright because it helped keep the body cooler as well. When the hot sun is beating down on you, only having your head as compared to your back shoulders neck and head was much less to deal with.
Good point and very probably true as well. Another advantage is that standing up allows one to look around better and see farther across the flat plains of Africa so that one can see a fresh kill that one can rob (humans were scavengers at the time). One can also see lions and other animals that might want to eat you coming.
Probably they all had a role in the final outcome.
-
@ Carolyn E. Price (gohomelaker)
Wow, that is quite the statement.
Well, I guess I'm one of the ones who believes that I come from a monkey, I don't know what that makes me but I just can't see any other rational explanation for it.
As far as this theory goes, surely there is something that these truly brilliant researchers and scientists could put their minds to other than trying to find out why, all those millions of years ago, we decided to get up off our four legs and walk on two? Honestly, does this really matter?
Grumble, grumble, I don't know whats come over me today ... I must be having an Amarant PMS day!
The genetic differences between Chimpanzees and humans is less than that between horses and donkeys or dogs and wolves and each of those pairs can cross breed to produce offspring that are bigger, stronger and SMARTER than their parents.
Well I'll be a monkey's uncle!
-
@ Samantha A. Torrence
Chris, way back in the day in school we learned that humans walked upright because it helped keep the body cooler as well. When the hot sun is beating down on you, only having your head as compared to your back shoulders neck and head was much less to deal with.
I love this statement..."way back in the day in school". She's 25 and already it's "way back in the day"? Wait til you're my age to say something like that! Well then, we are talking ancient history here so I guess when I went to school, monkey's had just recently started using two legs!
-
Well ghl since lensman is a monkey's uncle maybe that makes you a monkey's aunt? lol
-
@ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
Well ghl since lensman is a monkey's uncle maybe that makes you a monkey's aunt? lol
I think the main reason we EVOLVED into standing upright is so that we could stand by a stove and cook great meals. How did the Chicken Liver Pate go over?
-
Oh come on ghl if I believed in evolution I go back so far that I was probably just beginning to learn to stand upright. lol
You all are kids to me, well maybe except lensman as he is a year or so older than my youngest brother.
And 25, she is the age of my grandchildren.
-
I'd prefer to think of myself as the great-great-great(multiplied by a million or so) granddaughter! I hope I have evolved enough to be that far removed.
All kidding aside, each of us has the right to believe whatever they wish. Some of us prefer to believe in the science of things, some prefer to believe in their faith, and I for one find absolutely nothing wrong with this.
-
@ lensman67
I think the main reason we EVOLVED into standing upright is so that we could stand by a stove and cook great meals. How did the Chicken Liver Pate go over?
I had all the ingredients except the chicken livers and the grocery store did not have any chicken livers :-(
I was really disappointed. I have kept the receipe and will stop at some other grocery stores when I am in their areas.
I still plan on making it.
-
@ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
Sorry Chris I believe the evolution theory is a bunch of crap.
But for those who think your ancestors were monkeys go ahead and think it.
Picasso, all religious debate aside, IF humans were to evolve from primates, why would that be such a bad thing? You imply there is something wrong with having primates as an ancestor.
-
IF I believed in evolution I would see no problem with evolving from primates. They are very intelligent creatures as are many birds, cats and other creatures on this earth.
-
@ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
I had all the ingredients except the chicken livers and the grocery store did not have any chicken livers :-(
I was really disappointed. I have kept the receipe and will stop at some other grocery stores when I am in their areas.
I still plan on making it.
Try my 40 clove garlic chicken. It is good enough to make the monkeys come down out of the trees!
-
So, if we evolved from apes, then what is wrong with the apes that exist now? They just weren't "good enough" to turn into people or what? I don't quite get it.
To me, if something "evolves" into something else, then why is the thing it evolved from still around?
What actually decides whether it stays an ape or becomes human? And if apes are just less evolved humans, why don't the apes that exist today continue to evolve and become human as well.
Doesn't make sense to me.
-
I've just read this. Great article Chris!
A couple of days ago, my professor was mentioning how we evolved and he mentioned quite a few interesting things that I am sure you already know but some might not.
Since we started walking on two legs, we have had more back problems. Food for thought.
Also, if we take a look at the bat, chimpanzee, whale, and a lizard and we actually take a look at the structure of their arms, we would notice quite a resemblance to us. They all have a humerus, ulna, radius and carpals, which just brings one to conclude that we did come from animals and we were an "animal" once. Except they all use it for a very different reason. Also, the bones in the head show the exact same thing. Take a look at the fetus development in both, chimps and humans, and you will notice resemblance again!
Furthermore, I think Lensman mentioned this, but if we compare our DNA to the DNA of primates (chimps) we would notice very small differences. It is very similar.
I know those who have studied evolution know all of this, but I just thought it would be interesting for those who don't know about this. =)
-
@ Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
So, if we evolved from apes, then what is wrong with the apes that exist now? They just weren't "good enough" to turn into people or what? I don't quite get it.
To me, if something "evolves" into something else, then why is the thing it evolved from still around?
What actually decides whether it stays an ape or becomes human? And if apes are just less evolved humans, why don't the apes that exist today continue to evolve and become human as well.
Doesn't make sense to me.
The apes present today are evolved species of primates. My understanding of the theory of evolution is that primates evolved into humans and modern day apes and monkeys, etc. -- they are not the exact same species that existed in the past.
There are many reasons why all species did not evolve the same, and its simple Darwinism: climate, geographical surroundings, access to food, etc. all cause things to evolve differently.
It's even obvious in humans: We have black, white, Asian, Hispanic, etc. -- we all look different, and that is a product of evolving differently because of surroundings, climate, etc.
-
Years ago I took a course on evolution where we went to the primate lab at Stanford. There was an empty cage with a ring like handle built into the wall. Everyone was allowed to go into the cage and try to pull the lever. One big football player braced his foot against the wall and pulled with all his might and couldn't budge the thing.
We all left the cage and the door was closed. Then they let a three year old female chimp in to the cage and she strolled over to the handle and casually pulled it three times releasing three bananas. It didn't even seem difficult for her. That is how strong they are. Even a little 3 year old could pull your arm off.
By the way did anyone see the birthday party for Cheetah the chimp from the old Tarzan movies? I guess he is almost 80 by now!
-
@ Carolyn E. Price (gohomelaker)
I love this statement..."way back in the day in school". She's 25 and already it's "way back in the day"? Wait til you're my age to say something like that! Well then, we are talking ancient history here so I guess when I went to school, monkey's had just recently started using two legs!
lmao, sorry I feel old.
-
Scoop, animals are "evolving" all the time, we are constantly creating new breeds of dogs, etc. but just because we create a new "breed" does not mean that the ones that made that breed are no longer in existence.
-
@ Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
So, if we evolved from apes, then what is wrong with the apes that exist now? They just weren't "good enough" to turn into people or what? I don't quite get it.
To me, if something "evolves" into something else, then why is the thing it evolved from still around?
What actually decides whether it stays an ape or becomes human? And if apes are just less evolved humans, why don't the apes that exist today continue to evolve and become human as well.
Doesn't make sense to me.
They were not all the same, just like we today have different races of people and also we have different for example types of cats. So, not all of them evolved because for some their environment was enough to survive. For others, it was not so they had to evolve and adjust to their environment.
Again, there are a lot of different types of "apes" out there. You might not even know about them. Yesterday, I found out about another type of ape that I didn't know exists. But I'll keep that one for myself because it would make a rather interesting article. :)
-
@ Pamela Jean (GotTheScoop)
So, if we evolved from apes, then what is wrong with the apes that exist now? They just weren't "good enough" to turn into people or what? I don't quite get it.
To me, if something "evolves" into something else, then why is the thing it evolved from still around?
What actually decides whether it stays an ape or becomes human? And if apes are just less evolved humans, why don't the apes that exist today continue to evolve and become human as well.
Doesn't make sense to me.
You are not quite clear on the concept Scoop. Evolution isn't about "better" or "worse" is is about survival of whatever works. All the birds on the Galapagos are finches, evolved probably from only a few original birds.
They have filled all the ecological niches that many different types of birds fill on the mainland fill so they have duck billed finches, meat eating finches that look like hawks, finches with big heavy bills to crack nuts and many others. All from the same original type of bird.
They all exist together because there are niches to hold them. None is "better" they are just different. There are millions of different insects, birds, fish and other animals each filling its own little niche. There is not simply one supper bug, one supper bird and one super primate.
Apes still fill ape niches and we evolved to fill one and then kept going.
-
|
Posted Jul 17, 2007 by MR |
|
#27
|
oooooo oooo ahhhhhh ahh!
-
I am with GTS and with that said, I am going to leave all you lovely people as I have a meeting at noon and I am running way behind schedule.
-
@ Theodora L. (Franklin)
I've just read this. Great article Chris!
A couple of days ago, my professor was mentioning how we evolved and he mentioned quite a few interesting things that I am sure you already know but some might not.
Since we started walking on two legs, we have had more back problems. Food for thought.
Also, if we take a look at the bat, chimpanzee, whale, and a lizard and we actually take a look at the structure of their arms, we would notice quite a resemblance to us. They all have a humerus, ulna, radius and carpals, which just brings one to conclude that we did come from animals and we were an "animal" once. Except they all use it for a very different reason. Also, the bones in the head show the exact same thing. Take a look at the fetus development in both, chimps and humans, and you will notice resemblance again!
Furthermore, I think Lensman mentioned this, but if we compare our DNA to the DNA of primates (chimps) we would notice very small differences. It is very similar.
I know those who have studied evolution know all of this, but I just thought it would be interesting for those who don't know about this. =)
I think people should read Stephen J. Gould's "The Panda's Thumb" if they really want to understand evolution. Franklin makes an excellent point about how mammals have so many things in common. All mammals have five "fingers" of one sort or another even horses and whales (in the make up of the hoof or flipper) so why does the Panda have six?
If all animals were the result of "Intelligent design" why did the designer do such a crappy job? Why do humans have back problems from walking upright? Why does a panda have a thumb made out of his wrist bone? Why do we have tonsils? The list of "design flaws" in evolution that any rookie designer fresh out of design school would get fired from his first job for such sloppy work.
The Gould books are all short, funny, very well written essays that take all the many design flaws in nature and use them to explain evolution. Hen's teeth and Horses Toes is another of his books and uses those two real traits to explain how the intelligent designer wasn't very intelligent.
-
@ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
IF I believed in evolution I would see no problem with evolving from primates. They are very intelligent creatures as are many birds, cats and other creatures on this earth.
Picasso, why was the "intelligent designer" so stupid? There are more design flaws in nature that in a Soviet truck factory. Ever have your tonsils out? Nipples on men?
-
The late Dr. Stephen Jay Gould, Harvard professor of Biology, Paleontology, and the History of Science, use to be the "Hammer of Darwin" and was the top gun in the battle to keep so called "intelligent design" out of science class rooms.
He won every court case he testified in because he would never even bother to argue "intelligent design" and would instead concentrate on the "designer's" screw ups. As he said "perfection proves nothing but it is those cases where the designer failed to achieve perfection that prove the case for evolution."
A sloppy and inefficient thumb made from a wrist bone when there is a perfectly good thumb that has evolved into a paw right nest to the makeshift one is proof that someone was having a bad day in the design shop.
Article hint for those who are looking for something. List how many design flaws you can find in nature. You might have to do several articles!
-
I love how people who don't believe in Evolution call it a theory and want schools to put the words "Theory of" in front of it. Everything in science is a theory. There are no absolute truths in science. That's the whole point. We accept the best theory that can be shown by our best experiments to be true and that can not be shown to be false at the time. At one point we believed heat to be a substance and that was the generally accepted theory by the scientific community at large. Evolution has passed all the tests. It makes logical sense. And there's nothing out there that's a better scientific theory.
Here's a bomb for some of you, some people believe in both evolution AND that god did it. Many scientists are people of faith. Even Albert Einstein considered the possibility of a higher power. It says in the bible quite clearly that God's time is not our own time. A strict literal interpretation of the bible is not logical. Besides the fact that it wasn't originally ever written in our language, it's target audience was a bunch of extremely primitive people who wouldn't possibly accept or understand a scientific description of the creation of the universe. The argument that why did god screw up doesn't phase a religious person. They'll tell you that god did it like that on purpose. He's a mystery, we don't understand his ways. Why did god kill all those people with the black plague? Mystery, we don't understand his ways etc.
I'm agnostic though so what do I care? I'm like fruit fly.
To the point of the article, it's an interesting study. I'm not sure if I can say they decisively proved their point but it's a good start.
-
@ atroxodisse
I love how people who don't believe in Evolution call it a theory and want schools to put the words "Theory of" in front of it. Everything in science is a theory. There are no absolute truths in science. That's the whole point. We accept the best theory that can be shown by our best experiments to be true and that can not be shown to be false at the time. At one point we believed heat to be a substance and that was the generally accepted theory by the scientific community at large. Evolution has passed all the tests. It makes logical sense. And there's nothing out there that's a better scientific theory.
Here's a bomb for some of you, some people believe in both evolution AND that god did it. Many scientists are people of faith. Even Albert Einstein considered the possibility of a higher power. It says in the bible quite clearly that God's time is not our own time. A strict literal interpretation of the bible is not logical. Besides the fact that it wasn't originally ever written in our language, it's target audience was a bunch of extremely primitive people who wouldn't possibly accept or understand a scientific description of the creation of the universe. The argument that why did god screw up doesn't phase a religious person. They'll tell you that god did it like that on purpose. He's a mystery, we don't understand his ways. Why did god kill all those people with the black plague? Mystery, we don't understand his ways etc.
I'm agnostic though so what do I care? I'm like fruit fly.
To the point of the article, it's an interesting study. I'm not sure if I can say they decisively proved their point but it's a good start.
Good post. The "God's time is not our time" is why I recommended "Inherit the Wind," where it won the case--in the movie.
-
@ lensman67
Picasso, why was the "intelligent designer" so stupid? There are more design flaws in nature that in a Soviet truck factory. Ever have your tonsils out? Nipples on men?
"nipples on men?" Apparently, some men's nipples are very sensitive to sexual stimulation.
-
Divine,
some men can even lactate and feed children if thier breasts are stimulated.
-
@ Samantha A. Torrence
Divine,
some men can even lactate and feed children if thier breasts are stimulated.
Imagine a husband and a wife fighting over who's turn it is to breast feed? LOL
-
@ 666divine
Imagine a husband and a wife fighting over who's turn it is to breast feed? LOL
Let's face it. The "intelligent designer" ain't all that intelligent!
-
@ lensman67
Let's face it. The "intelligent designer" ain't all that intelligent!
You are well aware that does offend many people Lensman.
-
@ Samantha A. Torrence
You are well aware that does offend many people Lensman.
Why? Shouldn't we complain over shoddy workmanship? How intelligent can a designer be to make a thumb out of a wrist bone? This is not an argument against God, it is an argument against "intelligent design."
It is not required to believe the "six day theory" of creation in order to be religious.
-
Intelligent design takes everything we know about probability models and says "meh". My favorite statement is when they say "what are the odds of that being random?" It's a rhetorical question of course, but if you take it and turn it on it's head and ask the opposite question it's just as effective an argument against intelligent design, in other words, "what are the odds that it wouldn't happen?" The fact is, you don't know the odds, and you don't really know what odds are if you're asking the question in the first place. Odds are it didn't happen the first time. Odds are it didn't happen the first trillion times, but at some point, if it can happen, at some point, it probably will happen. It's called probability.
-
@ lensman67
Let's face it. The "intelligent designer" ain't all that intelligent!
You jest, I'm certain. I think the human body is perfectly designed. I know my is.
-
@ atroxodisse
Intelligent design takes everything we know about probability models and says "meh". My favorite statement is when they say "what are the odds of that being random?" It's a rhetorical question of course, but if you take it and turn it on it's head and ask the opposite question it's just as effective an argument against intelligent design, in other words, "what are the odds that it wouldn't happen?" The fact is, you don't know the odds, and you don't really know what odds are if you're asking the question in the first place. Odds are it didn't happen the first time. Odds are it didn't happen the first trillion times, but at some point, if it can happen, at some point, it probably will happen. It's called probability.
Great point. A lot of people have trouble grasping probability, I know I use to make a lot of money playing poker. When someone says that something is "a million to one shot" they think that means impossible but they forget that in a nation of 300 million that means that it will happen about three hundred times!
In an infinite universe a billion to one shot is nothing.
Yes they say but why here? Easy. We don't know how many times it has happened in an infinite universe but even if it was only once then that one time would be the only one who could ask the question and that would be---US!
A billion, billion, billion to one is child's play compared to infinity!
-
@ lensman67
A billion, billion, billion to one is child's play compared to infinity!
Yep. Any number divided by infinity ( except of course infinity itself, infinity/infinity = 1 ) is 0.
Add a Comment
|
 |
|
 |