| Science Post News ($)     Upload Images»
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» Help Center» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»

article imageAre all nano particles magnetic? New question, new ball game

Published Jul 16, 2007, by Paul Wallis
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print
Subscribe to author
Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
Straight out of Lewis Carroll: Things that aren’t normally magnetic are, when they’re nano particles. The materials were studied at room temperature, which is another departure from the script. Indian scientists found something nobody was looking for.
Ferromagnetism was also found in nano particles of superconductors, which under normal circumstances would be a contradiction in terms. The results from these tests have created a new ball park for physics.

There’s another side to this discovery, and it will have some pretty hyperactive physicists scuttling around. One of the most infuriating things about quantum physics is that quantum doesn’t work on the same rules as normal physics. That’s been driving quite a few people round the twist, trying to figure out what the quantum rules are.

Nano isn’t quantum, but it’s the next best thing in many ways. The presence of unsuspected magnetism seems to indicate that forces which don’t occur in normal states of materials and matter can occur in these micro states. That, believe me, if true, would make a lot of people feel a lot better about their ideas regarding quantum.

Forces and energies in quantum physics haven’t been translating at all well in terms of macro physics in the Newtonian and Einsteinian senses. This sort of hybridized version of magnetism and bonding forces is exactly what’s been missing.

Having said which I must point out that this isn’t anything which could be called proof of quantum forces behaving like that, but it does look like a clue


Note: 1. The link opens a box, not a browser window.
2. If you're using IE, you'll probably see some scrambled text on the page.
Source: nano.org.uk external
article:206954:4::0

Comments »

Share on
del.icio.us digg facebook newsvine reddit stumbleupon technorati
Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?